Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Implementation and evaluation of video consultation in psychiatric outpatient treatment. The study will focus on patients' experiences regarding the use of VC. The study will also examine important aspects of the telepsychiatric consultation such as therapeutic alliance, consultation content, psychopathology and satisfaction levels compared to face-to-face consultations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Video group | Experimental | Case management through video format |
|
| In-person | Active Comparator | Case management through in person format |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case management | Other | Case management cover therapy (psychotherapy/psychoeducation), medication adjustment, training in daily living skills (supportive), and direct consultations in crises. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The demand for video consultation (VC) in clinical practice. | The demand for VC is evaluated by the percentage of included participants who chose to be in the VC group and the actual use of VC consultation sessions during the study period, including the number of missed appointments and the number of times VC sessions have been converted to telephone or in-person (IP) consultations. | One year |
| Patients' therapeutic alliance, assessed by working alliance inventory- client version (WAI-C) | Therapeutic alliance is evaluated with the mean change scores in the WAI-C questionnaire at baseline and posttreatment. Score ranging: from 12 to 84. Higher scores indicate a higher therapeutic alliance | Two months. |
| Patients' satisfaction, assessed by client satisfaction questionnaire 8 (CSQ-8) | Satisfaction is evaluated with the mean change scores in the CSQ-8 questionnaire at baseline and posttreatment. Score ranging: from 8 to 32. Higher scores indicate a higher satisfaction | Two months. |
| Patients' Symptom level, assessed by Symptom Checklist -10 (SCL-10) | Symptom level is evaluated with the mean change scores in the SCL-10 questionnaire at baseline and posttreatment. Score ranging: from 0 to 100. Lower score indicates lower psychological distress | Two months. |
| Patients' well-being, assessed by World Health Organisation- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) | Well-being level is evaluated with the mean change scores in the WHO-5 questionnaire at baseline and posttreatment. Score ranging: from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher well-being | Two months. |
| Patients' function, assessed by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychiatric research unit, Region Zealand, | Slagelse | Denmark |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001883 | Borderline Personality Disorder |
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D013313 | Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic |
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010554 | Personality Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D040921 | Stress Disorders, Traumatic |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019090 | Case Management |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010347 | Patient Care Planning |
| D003191 | Comprehensive Health Care |
| D010346 | Patient Care Management |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Functional impairment is evaluated with the mean change scores in the SDS questionnaire at baseline and posttreatment. Score ranging: from 0 to 30. lower scores indicate lower functional impairment |
| Two months. |
| Patient recovery, assessed by INSPIRE | Patient recovery is evaluated with the mean change scores in the INSPIRE questionnaire at baseline and posttreatment. Score ranging: from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates higher recovery | Two months. |
| The implementation and integration of VC in clinical practice, as assessed by a checklist developed for the case managers (CM). | The following properties are used to evaluate the implementation and integration properties:
Descriptive statistics will be applied to evaluate the implementation and integration properties. | One year |
| Patients' experiences regarding the use of VC | Semistructured interviews have been conducted to evaluate participants' experience regarding the use of VC technology in clinical practice. | Two months |
| D000068099 |
| Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders |