Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Cesarean delivery (CD) is an obstetric surgery for fetal delivery that involves both an abdominal incision (laparotomy) and a uterine incision (hysterotomy). It is presently the most prevalent surgery in the United States, with over 1 million women giving birth by cesarean section each year.
The anaesthetic types of choice for cesarean delivery are neuraxial and general anaesthesia.
Neuraxial anesthesia is the gold standard anaesthesia for CD; it includes spinal and epidural anaesthesia. For spinal anaesthesia, local anesthetics are injected into the spinal canal, while for epidural anaesthesia, they are injected into the epidural space.
Despite the superiority of neuraxial anaesthesia for cesarean delivery, general anesthesia is still performed to some extent especially when neuraxial anaesthesia is failed or inconsistent.
General anesthesia involves a transient state of unconsciousness through the administration of inhaled anesthetic gases combined with intravenous drugs.
LBP patients showed changes in their neuromuscular activity, reduction in the lumbar muscle flexibility, and alteration of the biomechanical properties of the lumbar muscles.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 9 participants have exposed to midline epidural anaesthesia for cesarean delivery. |
| |
| Group B | 22 participants have exposed to midline spinal anaesthesia for cesarean delivery. |
| |
| Group C | 10 participants underwent general anesthesia for cesarean delivery. |
| |
| Group D | 22 participants were in the control group (no previous pregnancy or anaesthesia). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myoton PRO device (MyotonPRO; Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia) | Device | The MyotoPRO device is a portable objective device for measuring the contractile (tone), and biomechanical (stiffness) properties of lumbar paravertebral muscles (LPVMs). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lumbar paravertebral muscle frequency (tone) | Tone is a contractile property of a muscle which describes the resting muscle's resistance to passive and active stretch forces | Assessment will be done 6-12 weeks after the use of anaesthesia for Cesarean section by the MyotonPRO device |
| Lumbar paravertebral muscle stiffness | Stiffness is a biomechanical property of a muscle and its connective tissue which refers to the tissue's resistance toward the deformation of external load | Assessment will be done 6-12 weeks after the use of anaesthesia for Cesarean section by the MyotonPRO device |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Because this study is presented to the department of Physical Therapy for Women's Health to observe the changes after cesarean delivery and its relevant anaesthesia.
Sixty-three women participated in this study and were recruited from South Valley University Teaching Hospitals, in Qena governorate, Egypt.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of physical therapy, South Valley University | Qina | Qena Governorate | 83523 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Iddrisu M, Khan ZH. Anesthesia for cesarean delivery: general or regional anesthesia-a systematic review. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology. 2021 Dec;13(1):1-7. | ||
| 30985305 | Background | Mhyre JM, Sultan P. General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Occasionally Essential but Best Avoided. Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun;130(6):864-866. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002708. No abstract available. | |
| 30459029 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Background |
| Lenhardt R. Body temperature regulation and anesthesia. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;157:635-644. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64074-1.00037-9. |
| 34721664 | Background | Struzik A, Karamanidis K, Lorimer A, Keogh JWL, Gajewski J. Application of Leg, Vertical, and Joint Stiffness in Running Performance: A Literature Overview. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2021 Oct 21;2021:9914278. doi: 10.1155/2021/9914278. eCollection 2021. |
| 28005829 | Background | Van Deun B, Hobbelen JSM, Cagnie B, Van Eetvelde B, Van Den Noortgate N, Cambier D. Reproducible Measurements of Muscle Characteristics Using the MyotonPRO Device: Comparison Between Individuals With and Without Paratonia. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2018 Oct/Dec;41(4):194-203. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000119. |
| Background | Sung, S., and Mahdy, H. (2021): |
| 31151377 | Background | Hodges PW, Danneels L. Changes in Structure and Function of the Back Muscles in Low Back Pain: Different Time Points, Observations, and Mechanisms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jun;49(6):464-476. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8827. |
| 35248290 | Background | Hamilton RI, Garden CLP, Brown SJ. Immediate effect of a spinal mobilisation intervention on muscle stiffness, tone and elasticity in subjects with lower back pain - A randomized cross-over trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Jan;29:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.09.032. Epub 2021 Oct 9. |
| 31759390 | Background | Lo WLA, Yu Q, Mao Y, Li W, Hu C, Li L. Lumbar muscles biomechanical characteristics in young people with chronic spinal pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 23;20(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2935-z. |