Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with large hepatic cysts (> 5cm) may develop symptoms. These can be captured with the polycystic liver disease questionnaire (PLD-Q). Treatment of large hepatic cysts consists of aspiration sclerotherapy or laparoscopic fenestration.
The safety and efficacy of both procedures has been explored in two recent systematic reviews yet no evident conclusion regarding superiority of either procedure could be drawn.
The main objective of the ATLAS trial is to compare laparoscopic fenestration and aspiration sclerotherapy in patients with large symptomatic hepatic cysts on patient-reported outcomes.
Rationale: Patients with large hepatic cysts(>5cm) may develop symptoms due to distention of Glisson's capsule and/or compression on other abdominal organs. Frequently reported symptoms include abdominal pain, early satiety, nausea, and dyspnea. These symptoms can be captured in the disease-specific Polycystic Liver Disease Questionnaire (PLD-Q), a validated instrument. The treatment of symptomatic liver cysts is aimed to improve symptoms and quality of life by reducing cyst volume. There are two procedures available to treat symptomatic liver cysts: percutaneous aspiration sclerotherapy and laparoscopic fenestration.
In aspiration sclerotherapy, fluid is evacuated from the liver cyst and subsequently the cyst lining is exposed to a sclerosing agent for a limited period of time. Sclerotherapy causes temporary recurrence of cyst fluid after drainage, but subsequently results in a steady decrease of cyst volume in the majority of patients.
In laparoscopic fenestration the liver is exposed through laparoscopic surgery. In this procedure the cyst is punctured and drained followed by resection of extra-hepatic cyst wall.
The safety and efficacy of aspiration sclerotherapy and laparoscopic fenestration have been explored in two recent systematic reviews. No evident conclusion could be drawn because of the retrospective study design in the vast majority of the studies and the heterogeneity among these. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to identify the possible differences in safety and efficacy in aspiration sclerotherapy and laparoscopic fenestration.
Hypothesis: The investigators expect patients treated with laparoscopic fenestration to have better clinical outcome; i.e. a lower PLD-Q score, compared to aspiration sclerotherapy, when measured 4 weeks after the procedure. The investigators expect this difference to become smaller over time (after 6 and 12 months), with loss of statistical significance.
Objective: The main objective is to compare laparoscopic fenestration and aspiration sclerotherapy in patients with large symptomatic hepatic cysts on patient-reported outcomes. This information can be used to assess cost-effectiveness in both treatments.
Study design: A prospective, randomized clinical superiority trial in which patients will be randomized 1:1 to one of the treatment arms. Patients will be followed for 1 year.
Study population: All patients ≥18 years who are diagnosed with a dominant, simple hepatic cyst (>5 cm in diameter), that are symptomatic (PLD-Q score ≥20) and have an indication for treatment (both aspiration sclerotherapy and laparoscopic fenestration) are suitable for inclusion in this study. Only patients that are eligible for both treatments can be included in this study. In particular, patients with multiple cysts (>20 cysts of >1.5 cm) will be excluded as surgery leads to more complications in these patients.
Intervention: Patients will be randomly allocated to either aspiration sclerotherapy or laparoscopic fenestration. Both procedures are performed according to the standard Radboudumc protocols. Aspiration sclerotherapy consists of ultrasound-guided, percutaneous drainage of the cyst with subsequent sclerosation with ethanol. Laparoscopic fenestration consists of standard abdominal laparoscopy in which the large cyst(s) are drained and deroofed.
Main study parameters: The main study parameter is the PLD-Q score at 4 weeks after treatment. Secondary parameters are among others: PLD-Q score at baseline, 6 months and 12 months; liver volume (CT) at baseline and 4 weeks; cyst volume (ultrasound) at baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months; complications according to Clavien-Dindo; admission duration, recurrence and re-intervention rates.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspiration sclerotherapy | Active Comparator | Aspiration sclerotherapy is a percutaneous procedure that evacuates fluid from the liver cyst and subsequently exposes cyst lining to a sclerosing agent (e.g. ethanol, minocycline) for a limited period of time. |
|
| Laparoscopic Fenestration | Active Comparator | Laparoscopic fenestration exposes the liver through laparoscopic surgery. During this procedure the cyst is punctured and drained followed by resection of the extra-hepatic cyst wall |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aspiration sclerotherapy versus laparoscopic fenestration | Procedure | See arm description |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PLD-Q 4 weeks | Comparison of PLD-Q scores 4 weeks after the procedure, adjusted for baseline PLD-Q score. | 4 weeks after the procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PLD-Q score 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention | PLD-Q score at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted for baseline | up to 12 months |
| PLD-Q invididual symptoms | PLD-Q individual symptom scores at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, compared to baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥18 years
Hepatic cyst characteristics:
Providing informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joost P.H. Drenth | Contact | +31 24 3619190 | joostphdrenth@cs.com | |
| Thijs Barten | Contact | +31 24 8186542 | thijs.rm.barten@radboudumc.nl |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joost P.H. Drenth | Radboud University Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radboudumc University Medical Center | Recruiting | Nijmegen | Gelderland | 6500 HB | Netherlands |
Individual participant data are available to other researchers for clinical research purposes upon reasonable request to the principal investigator
Study data will be provided upon reasonable request with the principal investigator
Study data will be provided upon reasonable request with the principal investigator
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| up to 12 months |
| SF-36 MCS | SF-36 Mental Component Score at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted to baseline | up to 12 months |
| SF 36 PCS | SF-36 Physical Component Score at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted to baseline | up to 12 months |
| EQ-5D-5L | EQ-5D-5L score at 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted to baseline | up to 12 months |
| Liver and cyst volume | Liver and cyst volume with CT before and 12 months after the intervention | up to 12 months |
| Liver and cyst volume at recurrence | Liver and cyst volume in cases of recurrence of symptoms | up to 12 months |
| Cyst volume with US | Cyst volume with ultrasound, at baseline and 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention. | up to 12 months |
| Adverse events | Adverse events (according to Clavien-Dindo) | up to 12 months |
| Technical success | Technical success | periprocedural |
| Hospital stay | Hospital stay in days | periprocedural |
| Re-intervention rates | Re-intervention rates during 12 months follow-up. | up to 12 months |
| Cost-effectiveness iPCQ | Cost-effectiveness of both procedures iPCQ 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted for baseline | up to 12 months |
| Cost-effectiveness iMCQ | Cost-effectiveness of both procedures iMCQ 1, 6 and 12 months after intervention, adjusted for baseline | up to 12 months |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C536330 | Polycystic liver disease |
| D016891 | Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007690 | Polycystic Kidney Diseases |
| D052177 | Kidney Diseases, Cystic |
| D007674 | Kidney Diseases |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D000015 | Abnormalities, Multiple |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D000072661 | Ciliopathies |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
Not provided
Not provided