Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| EVAMED | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this pre-market clinical investigation is to assess the safety and the performance of decongestant seawater spray pocket valve enriched with essential oils by Gilbert Laboratories. The study will evaluate the results of acute rhinitis associated with nasal obstruction using the decongestant seawaterspray pocket valve enriched with essential oils over a 8 day period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Patients with peak nasal flow performed | Other | This arm is made up of major patients. Nasal flow point measurements will be performed at D0 and D3. |
|
| Arm B: No peak nasal flow | No Intervention | This arm is made up of minor patients. Unlike arm A, nasal flow measurements will not be performed at D0 and D3. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measurement of peak nasal flow. | Device | Peak nasal flow measurements will be performed before and after the first use of the spray at D0, as well as after the use of the spray at the medical office at D3 (only for arm A). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Performance of the Gilbert Laboratories pocket valve spray. | Proportion of patient presenting a change of the symptom "nasal obstruction" by at least 1 pt, in the SNOT22 Test (item 22), between Day 0 (at inclusion in the office before use of the spray) and Day 3 (in the evening after last daily use of the spray). This item is scaled from 0 to 5, 5 being the worst value. | From Day 0 to Day 3 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change of nasal obstruction between Day 0 and Day 3 | Proportion of patients with a change in Peak Inspiratory Nasal Flow value of at least 30 L/min between Day 0 (before use of the spray) and Day 3 (after use of the spray) (arm A). [0 - 350 L/min] 350 L/min means a better outcome. | From Day 0 to Day 3 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carine BRUNEL | Contact | +33 (0)1 45 39 50 21 | cbrunel@labogilbert.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cabinet Médical | Recruiting | Blainville-sur-Orne | 14550 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Immediate change of nasale obstruction at D0 on first use (Arm A) |
Proportion of patients with a change in Peak Inspiratory Nasal Flow value of at least 30 L/min from pre- to post-spray measurements at Day 0 (arm A). [ 0 - 350 L/min] 350 L/min means a better outcome. |
| At Day 0 |
| Subjective feeling of reduced nasal obstruction on each day of use (arms A+B). | Proportion of patients with a reduction in the symptom "nasal obstruction" of at least 1pt, on SNOT22 (Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22), and on each day of use (from Day 0 to Day 6) (arms A+B). This item is scaled from 0 to 5, 5 being the worst value. | From Day 0 to Day 6 |
| Subjective feeling of nasal cavity cleansing (freshness) each day of use (arms A+B). | Proportion of patients who experienced nasal cavity cleansing (feeling of freshness), on Patient Questionnaire, and on each day of use (from Day 0 to Day 6) (arms A+B). | From Day 0 to Day 6 |
| Subjective feeling of nasal secretion thinning on each day of use (arms A+B). | Proportion of patients with a change in the symptom "thick nasal discharge" of at least 1pt, on SNOT22, and on each day of use (Day 0 to Day 6) (arms A+B). This item is scaled from 0 to 5, 5 being the worst value. | From Day 0 to Day 6 |
| Subjective feeling of relief of nasal irritation (mucous membrane) on each day of use (arms A+B). | Proportion of patients who experienced relief of nasal (mucosal) irritation, on each day of use (Day 0 to Day 6) (arms A+B). | From Day 0 to Day 6 |
| Subjective feeling of relief of nasal itching on each day of use (arms A+B). | Proportion of patients who experienced relief of nasal itching, on Patient Questionnaire, and on each day of use (Day 0 to Day 6) (arms A+B). | From Day 0 to Day 6 |
| Speed of action at which the patient feels (subjectively) a decrease in nasal obstruction at D0 and D3 (arms A+B). | Proportion of patients with a change in immediate nasal obstruction after use of the spray, on Patient Questionnaire, at Day 0 and Day 3 (arms A+B). | At Day 0 and Day 3 |
| Speed of action at which the patient feels (subjectively) a purification of his nasal cavities (sensation of freshness) at D0 and D3 (arms A+B). | Proportion of patients who experienced immediate nasal cleansing (feeling of freshness) after use of the spray at Day 0 and Day 3 (arms A+B). | At Day 0 and Day 3 |
| Improvement in the patient's quality of life after 7 days of use (arms A+B). | Proportion of patients who experienced an improvement in quality of life, defined as an increase of at least 1pt on a scale of 0-10 between Day 0 and Day 6 (A+B arm). 10 mean a better value. | From Day 0 to Day 6 |
| Patient satisfaction with the medical device after 7 days of use (arm A+B). | Proportion of patients satisfied with the medical device, on a 4-point scale, at Day 6 (arm A+B). The better value is "very satisfied" and the worst value is "very unsatisfied". Proportion of patients who would recommend the medical device at Day 6 (arms A+B). Proportion of patients who will continue to use the medical device , and the reason if not, (arms A+B). | At Day 6 |
| Facility of use of the medical device after 7 days of use (arm A+B) | Proportion of patients who find the medical device easy to use, on day 6 (Arms A+B) | At Day 6 |
| Evolution of the overall severity of symptoms (arm A+B). | Mean SNOT22 score on each day. Comparison of SNOT22 score at Day 3 versus Day 0 baseline (arms A+B). [ 0 to 220 ] 0 is the better value. | At Day 0 and Day 3 |
| Sensations of tingling and transient irritation (arms A+B). | Proportion of patients with at least 1 adverse event between 1st and last use of the medical device among the following adverse events (arms A+B):
| From Day 0 to Day 6 |
| All adverse events reported by patients using the pocket valve spray after 7 days of use (arm A+B). | All adverse events reported by the patient during the study (arm A+B). | From Day 0 to Day 7 |
| Cabinet Médical Caen | Recruiting | Caen | 14000 | France |
|
| MSP du Haut Anjou | Recruiting | Châteauneuf-sur-Sarthe | 49330 | France |
|
| Cabinet Médical Gainneville | Withdrawn | Gainneville | 76700 | France |
| ALYATEC | Completed | Strasbourg | 67000 | France |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003139 | Common Cold |
| D015508 | Nasal Obstruction |
| D000096825 | Rhinosinusitis |
| D009304 | Nasopharyngitis |
| D065631 | Rhinitis, Allergic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D010850 | Picornaviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D009668 | Nose Diseases |
| D000402 | Airway Obstruction |
| D012131 | Respiratory Insufficiency |
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D012220 | Rhinitis |
| D012852 | Sinusitis |
| D010254 | Paranasal Sinus Diseases |
| D010612 | Pharyngitis |
| D009302 | Nasopharyngeal Diseases |
| D010608 | Pharyngeal Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D012130 | Respiratory Hypersensitivity |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided