Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ziekenhuisgroep Twente | OTHER |
| University Medical Center Groningen | OTHER |
| Norwegian University of Science and Technology | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The PI-CAI challenge aims to validate the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiologists at clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection/diagnosis in MRI, with respect to histopathology and follow-up (≥ 3 years) as reference. The study hypothesizes that state-of-the-art AI algorithms, trained using thousands of patient exams, are non-inferior to radiologists reading bpMRI. As secondary end-points, it investigates the optimal AI model for csPCa detection/diagnosis, and the effects of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging and reader experience on diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader variability.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most prevalent cancers in men worldwide. One million men receive a diagnosis and 300,000 die from clinically significant PCa (csPCa) (defined as ISUP≥2), each year, worldwide. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is playing an increasingly important role in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer, and has been recommended by the European Association of Urology (EAU), prior to biopsies. However, current guidelines for reading prostate mpMRI (i.e. PI-RADS v2.1) follow a semi-quantitative assessment that mandates substantial expertise for proper usage. This can lead to low inter-reader agreement (<50%), sub-optimal interpretation and overdiagnosis.
Modern artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have paved the way for powerful computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) systems that rival human performance in medical image analysis. Clinical trials are the gold standard for assessing new medications and interventions in a controlled and comparative manner, and the equivalent for developing AI algorithms are international competitions or "grand challenges", where increasingly large datasets are released to public to solve clinically relevant tasks with AI. Grand challenges can address the lack of trust, scientific evidence and adequate validation among AI solutions, by providing the means to compare algorithms against each other using common datasets and a unified experimental setup.
PI-CAI (Prostate Imaging: Cancer AI) is an all-new grand challenge, with over 10,000 carefully-curated prostate MRI exams to validate modern AI algorithms and estimate radiologists' performance at csPCa detection and diagnosis. Key aspects of the study design have been established in conjunction with an international, multi-disciplinary scientific advisory board (16 experts in prostate AI, radiology and urology) -to unify and standardize present-day guidelines, and to ensure meaningful validation of prostate-AI towards clinical translation.
The 2022 edition of PI-CAI will focus on validating AI at automated 3D detection and diagnosis of csPCa in bpMRI. PI-CAI primarily consists of two sub-studies:
In the end, PI-CAI aims to benchmark state-of-the-art AI algorithms developed in the grand challenge, against prostate radiologists participating in the reader study -to evaluate the clinical viability of modern prostate-AI solutions at csPCa detection and diagnosis in MRI.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Training and Development Set (1500 cases) | Available for all participants and researchers, to train and develop AI models. Includes multi-vendor (Siemens Healthineers, Philips Medical Systems) prostate bpMRI cases from three Dutch centers (Radboud University Medical Center, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, University Medical Center Groningen), acquired between 2012-2021. All data is fully anonymized and made available under a non-commercial CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Includes 328 cases from the PROSTATEx challenge (prostatex.grand-challenge.org). Imaging data has been released via: zenodo.org/record/6624726 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6624726). Lesion annotations of csPCa have been released and are maintained via: github.com/DIAGNijmegen/picai_labels. |
| |
| Private Training Set (7500-9500 cases) | Used exclusively by the organizers to retrain the top-ranking 5 AI algorithms, with large-scale data. Includes multi-vendor (Siemens Healthineers, Philips Medical Systems) prostate bpMRI cases from three Dutch centers (Radboud University Medical Center, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, University Medical Center Groningen), acquired between 2012-2021. |
| |
| Hidden Validation and Tuning Cohort (100 cases) | Used for a live, public leaderboard that enables AI model selection and tuning throughout the open development phase of the challenge. Includes multi-vendor (Siemens Healthineers, Philips Medical Systems) prostate bpMRI cases from three Dutch centers (Radboud University Medical Center, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, University Medical Center Groningen), acquired between 2012-2021, that remain fully hidden throughout the course of the challenge. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Histopathology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Follow-Up | Diagnostic Test | Reference standard establishes histologically-confirmed (ISUP ≥ 2) cases of csPCa as positives, and histopathology- (ISUP ≤ 1) or MRI- (PI-RADS ≤ 2) with follow-up (≥ 3 years) confirmed cases of indolent PCa or benign tissue as negatives. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| AI vs Radiologists from Reader Study | Diagnostic performance of the top 5 AI models from the grand challenge and 50+ radiologists from the reader study, at csPCa detection/diagnosis in prostate bpMRI, with respect to histopathology and MRI with follow-up (≥ 3 years) as reference, to assess the clinical viability of present-day AI solutions. | 6 months |
| AI vs Radiologists from Clinical Routine | Diagnostic performance of the top 5 AI models from the grand challenge and the historical reads of radiologists from clinical routine, at csPCa detection/diagnosis in prostate bpMRI, with respect to histopathology and MRI with follow-up (≥ 3 years) as reference, to assess the clinical viability of present-day AI solutions. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| AI vs AI | Diagnostic performance of the top 5 AI models from the grand challenge, at csPCa detection/diagnosis in prostate bpMRI, with respect to histopathology and MRI with follow-up (≥ 3 years) as reference, to deduce the optimal AI model architecture for this given task. | 6 months |
| Radiologists vs Radiologists from Reader Study |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All patient exams are of men suspected of harboring csPCa, with elevated levels of prostate-specific antigen (≥ 3 ng/mL) and/or abnormal findings on digital rectal exam, and without a history of treatment or any prior positive histopathology (ISUP ≥ 2) findings. Patients underwent prostate MRI, and were primarily examined at one of three Dutch centers (Radboud University Medical Center, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, University Medical Center Groningen) or one Norwegian center (Norwegian University of Science and Technology) during regular clinical routine, between 2012-2021.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Henkjan Huisman, PhD | Radboud University Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RadboudUMC | Nijmegen | Gelderland | 6525 GA | Netherlands |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41960994 | Derived | Twilt JJ, Saha A, Bosma JS, Giannarini G, Padhani AR, Yakar D, Elschot M, Veltman J, Futterer J, Huisman H, de Rooij M; PI-CAI Consortium. Evaluating an AI-driven Triaging Workflow for MRI-based Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Simulation Study. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2026 May;8(3):e250461. doi: 10.1148/rycan.250461. | |
| 38876123 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Official website. | View source |
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.5281/zenodo.6624726 | Individual Participant Data Set | View IPD |
To facilitate open and transparent science, our end-to-end study protocol and our source code for preprocessing prostate MRI data archives, training baseline diagnostic AI models, evaluating lesion detection/diagnosis performance, and implementing statistical tests for AI/radiologists vs AI/radiologists comparisons, have been publicly released. Furthermore, a fully-anonymized dataset of 1500 prostate bpMRI scans from the PI-CAI challenge, and their outcomes, have been released to promote further research.
Individual Participant Data Set (PI-CAI: Public Training and Development Set), Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and Analytic Code has been shared with all participants of the PI-CAI challenge and the research community at large, towards the start of the challenge (June 2022). Clinical Study Report (CSR) will be released in the form of multiple publications after the completion of the challenge (tentatively May 2023). All of the aforementioned IPD will remain publicly accessible perpetually.
Please refer to the "References" section of this protocol.
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| D004194 | Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008279 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014054 | Tomography |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Biospecimen is not stored beyond the timeframe of this study, for the purpose of this study. However, biospecimen is stored beyond the timeframe of this study, for the purpose of regular clinical care. In this case, biospecimen refers to histopathology tissue acquired from confirmatory prostate biopsies and prostatectomies. Within the scope of clinical routine, storing such specimen can facilitate reassessments through the future, e.g. for comparisons if the patient presents new findings or metastasis of their initial findings, for comparisons against histopathology findings of the original patient's offspring, or even for legal purposes in the case of misdiagnosis.
| Hidden Testing Cohort (1000 cases) | Used to benchmark AI, radiologists, and test all hypotheses at the end of the PI-CAI challenge. A subset of 400 cases from this cohort is used to facilitate the PI-CAI: Reader Study. Includes multi-vendor (Siemens Healthineers, Philips Medical Systems) internal testing data (unseen prostate bpMRI cases from three seen Dutch centers {Radboud University Medical Center, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, University Medical Center Groningen}) and external testing data (unseen prostate bpMRI cases from one unseen Norwegian center {Norwegian University of Science and Technology}), acquired between 2012-2021. |
|
|
| Histopathology and Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Diagnostic Test | Reference standard establishes histologically-confirmed (ISUP ≥ 2) cases of csPCa as positives, and histopathology- (ISUP ≤ 1) or MRI- (PI-RADS ≤ 2) confirmed cases of indolent PCa or benign tissue as negatives. |
|
Diagnostic performance and inter-reader variability of 50+ radiologists from the reader study, at csPCa detection/diagnosis in prostate mpMRI, with respect to histopathology and MRI with follow-up (≥ 3 years) as reference, to deduce the effects of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging and reader experience. |
| 6 months |
| Saha A, Bosma JS, Twilt JJ, van Ginneken B, Bjartell A, Padhani AR, Bonekamp D, Villeirs G, Salomon G, Giannarini G, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Barentsz J, Maier-Hein KH, Rusu M, Rouviere O, van den Bergh R, Panebianco V, Kasivisvanathan V, Obuchowski NA, Yakar D, Elschot M, Veltman J, Futterer JJ, de Rooij M, Huisman H; PI-CAI consortium. Artificial intelligence and radiologists in prostate cancer detection on MRI (PI-CAI): an international, paired, non-inferiority, confirmatory study. Lancet Oncol. 2024 Jul;25(7):879-887. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00220-1. Epub 2024 Jun 11. |
Imaging for the PI-CAI: Public Training and Development Dataset, containing 1500 fully-anonymized prostate bpMRI scans from 1476 patients, acquired between 2012-2021, at three Dutch centers (Radboud University Medical Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente). |
| 10.5281/zenodo.6667655 | Study Protocol | View IPD | Preregistration of the PI-CAI challenge study design, in compliance with BIAS reporting guidelines (https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/bias-transparent-reporting-of-biomedical-image-analysis-challenges/). |
| Analytic Code | View IPD | Source code for preprocessing prostate MRI data archives. |
| Analytic Code | View IPD | Source code for training baseline diagnostic AI models. |
| Analytic Code | View IPD | Source code for evaluating csPCa detection and diagnosis performance, and performing all statistical tests with respect to the same. |
| Individual Participant Data Set | View IPD | Annotations for the PI-CAI: Public Training and Development Dataset, containing basic clinical and acquisition variables, csPCa annotations and outcomes for 1500 fully-anonymized prostate bpMRI exams from 1476 patients, acquired between 2012-2021, at three Dutch centers (Radboud University Medical Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente). |
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |