For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

The results of this measurement method have certain cut-off values depending on gender and age. In this study, the performance was not compared according to the cut-off values, but between the groups.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

The results of this measurement method have certain cut-off values depending on gender and age. In this study, the performance was not compared according to the cut-off values, but between the groups.

6m hop for timed-6MTH: The participant was asked to jump on one leg as fast as possible from the marked start point to the finish point, which is 6 meters away from the marked start point. The time from the start to the end of 6 meters was recorded.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

6m hop for timed-6MTH: The participant was asked to jump on one leg as fast as possible from the marked start point to the finish point, which is 6 meters away from the marked start point. The time from the start to the end of 6 meters was recorded.

The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated to evaluate the difference between the two legs in all functional tests. Calculation for the case group; LSI = Affected leg score ÷ Unaffected leg score × 100 This calculation for the control group; LSI= Worse score ÷ Better score × 100.

The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated to evaluate the difference between the two legs in all functional tests. Calculation for the case group; LSI = Affected leg score ÷ Unaffected leg score × 100 This calculation for the control group; LSI= Worse score ÷ Better score × 100.

The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated to evaluate the difference between the two legs in all functional tests. Calculation for the case group; LSI = Affected leg score ÷ Unaffected leg score × 100 This calculation for the control group; LSI= Worse score ÷ Better score × 100.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

6m hop for timed-6MTH: The participant was asked to jump on one leg as fast as possible from the marked start point to the finish point, which is 6 meters away from the marked start point. The time from the start to the end of 6 meters was recorded.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated to evaluate the difference between the two legs in all functional tests. Calculation for the case group; LSI = Affected leg score ÷ Unaffected leg score × 100 This calculation for the control group; LSI= Worse score ÷ Better score × 100.

The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated to evaluate the difference between the two legs in all functional tests. Calculation for the case group; LSI = Affected leg score ÷ Unaffected leg score × 100 This calculation for the control group; LSI= Worse score ÷ Better score × 100.

The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated to evaluate the difference between the two legs in all functional tests. Calculation for the case group; LSI = Affected leg score ÷ Unaffected leg score × 100 This calculation for the control group; LSI= Worse score ÷ Better score × 100.

This group consists of athletes whose age range is 14-30, and who are still active at high school or university level in sports involving sudden changes of direction and jump physically and who do not have a history of lower extremity injuries.

Dual tasking paradigm: The dual task methodology is a testing model that requires one person to perform two tasks at the same time. The dual task is divided into two as motor-motor or motor-cognitive. Dual tasks provide an opportunity to examine the attention demands of both tasks and allow possible interference to be observed. The idea behind this design is that central processing capacity has a limit and must be distributed among concurrent tasks.

Total of all reporting groups

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

As a result of the evaluation, a score in the range of 0-30 is obtained. High scores indicate successful and good mental status, while low scores indicate poor results.

This determination method was used in order to personalize the difficulty of the mental task to be used in physical measurements. Each athlete was told a 2-digit random number before the measurements and the athlete was asked to say the same number in reverse. For each correct answer, the number of digits is increased by one. Whichever number of households the participant made a mistake, one more was used in the measurements. And this number of digits was recorded as the cognitive task difficulty level.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group (PIG), and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group (NIG).

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

The results of this measurement method have certain cut-off values depending on gender and age. In this study, the performance was not compared according to the cut-off values, but between the groups.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

The results of this measurement method have certain cut-off values depending on gender and age. In this study, the performance was not compared according to the cut-off values, but between the groups.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

6m hop for timed-6MTH: The participant was asked to jump on one leg as fast as possible from the marked start point to the finish point, which is 6 meters away from the marked start point. The time from the start to the end of 6 meters was recorded.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

6m hop for timed-6MTH: The participant was asked to jump on one leg as fast as possible from the marked start point to the finish point, which is 6 meters away from the marked start point. The time from the start to the end of 6 meters was recorded.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated to evaluate the difference between the two legs in all functional tests. Calculation for the case group; LSI = Affected leg score ÷ Unaffected leg score × 100 This calculation for the control group; LSI= Worse score ÷ Better score × 100.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated to evaluate the difference between the two legs in all functional tests. Calculation for the case group; LSI = Affected leg score ÷ Unaffected leg score × 100 This calculation for the control group; LSI= Worse score ÷ Better score × 100.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated to evaluate the difference between the two legs in all functional tests. Calculation for the case group; LSI = Affected leg score ÷ Unaffected leg score × 100 This calculation for the control group; LSI= Worse score ÷ Better score × 100.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group .

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group .

For balance measurement, Athlete Single Leg Stability, one of the test modes in the Biodex Balance System SD balance device, was preferred. The participant took a position with her/his eyes open, the foot of the untested leg resting on the back of the ankle of the tested leg, her arms crossed over her chest, and the balance center in the middle of the platform most comfortably. The analysis protocol was applied at 5 level, consisting of 20 seconds, 1 sample and 3 test repetitions, with a 10-second rest between repetitions. General stability index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), medial/lateral stability index (MLSI) were recorded.

The unit of data obtained in this device is the balance index. And values close to 0 indicate high stability.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

6m hop for timed-6MTH: The participant was asked to jump on one leg as fast as possible from the marked start point to the finish point, which is 6 meters away from the marked start point. The time from the start to the end of 6 meters was recorded.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

Triple hop for distance ,Crossover hop for distance-CHD -In these two tests, the distance between the starting line and the heel line in step 3 was measured. Normalization was done by dividing this distance (m) by the athlete's height (m).

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated to evaluate the difference between the two legs in all functional tests. Calculation for the case group; LSI = Affected leg score ÷ Unaffected leg score × 100 This calculation for the control group; LSI= Worse score ÷ Better score × 100.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated to evaluate the difference between the two legs in all functional tests. Calculation for the case group; LSI = Affected leg score ÷ Unaffected leg score × 100 This calculation for the control group; LSI= Worse score ÷ Better score × 100.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

The limb symmetry index (LSI) was calculated to evaluate the difference between the two legs in all functional tests. Calculation for the case group; LSI = Affected leg score ÷ Unaffected leg score × 100 This calculation for the control group; LSI= Worse score ÷ Better score × 100.

Athletes who are still active in team sports (basketball, volleyball and football) that involve sudden changes of direction and jumping were included in our study. 19 athletes with a history of unilateral lower extremity injuries were divided into the Previously Injured group, and 20 athletes with no previous injury were divided into the Non Injured Group.

This group consists of athletes whose age range is 14-30, and who are still active at high school or university level in sports involving sudden changes of direction and jump physically and who do not have a history of lower extremity injuries.

Dual tasking paradigm: The dual task methodology is a testing model that requires one person to perform two tasks at the same time. The dual task is divided into two as motor-motor or motor-cognitive. Dual tasks provide an opportunity to examine the attention demands of both tasks and allow possible interference to be observed. The idea behind this design is that central processing capacity has a limit and must be distributed among concurrent tasks.