Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, we proposed a prospective study about the effectiveness of artificial intelligence system for endoscopy report quality in endoscopists. The subjects would be divided into two groups. For the collected endoscopic videos, group A would complete the endoscopy report with the assistance of the artificial intelligence system. The artificial intelligence assistant system can automatically capture images, prompt abnormal lesions and the parts covered by the examination (the upper gastrointestinal tract is divided into 26 parts). Group B would complete the endoscopy report without special prompts. After a period of forgetting, the two groups switched, that is, group A without AI assistance and group B with AI assistance to complete the endoscopy report. Then, the completeness of the report lesion, the accuracy of the lesion location, the completeness of the lesion and the standard part in the captured images, and so on were compared with or without AI assistance.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| with Artificial intelligence assistant system | Experimental | Endoscopists would complete the endoscopy report with the assistance of the artificial intelligence system. |
|
| without Artificial intelligence assistant system | No Intervention | Endoscopists would complete the endoscopy report without special prompts. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial intelligence assistant system | Diagnostic Test | The artificial intelligence assistant system can automatically capture images, prompt abnormal lesions and the parts covered by the examination (the stomach is divided into 26 parts). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Integrity of report lesion | Report lesion integrity with or without AI-assisted. Calculation method = number of report lesions / total number of lesions x 100% | one month |
| Accuracy of lesion location | Accuracy of lesion location with or without AI-assisted. Calculation method = number of lesion with correct location / total number of lesions x 100% | one month |
| Integrity of lesion in captured images | Lesion integrity in captured images with or without AI-assisted. Calculation method = number of lesions in captured images / total number of lesions x 100% | one month |
| Integrity of standard part in captured images | Lesion integrity in captured images with or without AI-assisted. Calculation method = number of standard parts in captured images / the actual number of standard parts covered by the examination x 100% | one month |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honggang Yu, MD | Contact | 13871281899 | yuhonggang1969@163.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University | Recruiting | Wuhan | 430060 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36849056 | Derived | Zhang L, Lu Z, Yao L, Dong Z, Zhou W, He C, Luo R, Zhang M, Wang J, Li Y, Deng Y, Zhang C, Li X, Shang R, Xu M, Wang J, Zhao Y, Wu L, Yu H. Effect of a deep learning-based automatic upper GI endoscopic reporting system: a randomized crossover study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Aug;98(2):181-190.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.025. Epub 2023 Feb 25. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided