Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Università degli studi di Roma Foro Italico | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to tested the effect of combination of a paired associative stimulation of two functional interconnected areas of the cerebral cortex (posterior-parietal cortex and primary motor cortex) with robot-assisted therapy in the recovery of upper limb after stroke.
BACKGROUND
Stroke survivors reported upper limb impairment that contribute to reducing the overall quality of life, social participation and professional activities. The impairment of the upper limb is due to motor and sensory alteration that could compromise the sensorimotor integration. The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is a potential circuit where this integration could occur during active somatosensation. Indeed, PPC is a site of massive confluence of visual, tactile, proprioceptive, and vestibular signals. This area may be involved in transforming information about the location of targets in space, into signals related to motor intentions. This process likely occurs through parietal-motor connections, which are known to be involved in the transfer of relevant sensitive information for planning, reaching, and grasping. Paired associative stimulation (PAS) of PPC and primary motor area (M1), by means of bi-focal trans-cranial magnetic stimulation, can modulate M1 excitability. This information reinforces the hypothesis that modulation of PPC-M1 connectivity can be used as a new approach to modify motor excitability and sensorimotor interaction. Parallel, robot assisted training (RAT) can induce a plastic reorganization at the muscular afferents, spinal motor neurons, interneuron system and beyond and facilitates neural plasticity and motor relearning through goal-oriented training. The robotics device allows to train patients in an intensive, task-oriented, and top-down therapy way, increasing patients' compliance and motivation. The cognitive top-down stimulation is allowed by means of the introduction of visual feedback performed through exergaming. Recently, it has been proposed the development of new intervention strategies that combine neurostimulation of a target brain area with neurorehabilitation, such as physical therapy or virtual reality. Although both TMS and RAT have shown individually promising effects in upper limb recovery after a stroke, their combination has not been tested to date.
AIMS
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robot and stimulation PPC-M1 | Experimental | Combined paired pulse stimulation (PAS) with robot-assisted therapy |
|
| Robot and sham stimulation PPC-M1 | Sham Comparator | Combined sham PAS with robot-assisted therapy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cortico-cortical stimulation plus robot-assisted therapy | Device | 15 sessions of cortico-cortical stimulation between the PPC and the M1 of the lesioned hemisphere and robot-assisted therapy. Paired-pulse stimulation (PAS) technique, with 5ms inter-stimulus time between the two areas (PPC to M1), will be done through two high-power Magstim 200 machines (Magstim® Rapid²). To stimulate the M1 area, the coil will be placed tangentially to the scalp at a 45° angle to the midline, to stimulate the PPC area the center of the coil will be positioned over P4 (10-20 EEG system) tangentially to the skull with the handle pointing downward and slightly medial (10°). Robot-assisted therapy will be performed with an Armeo® Power II (Hocoma), an integrative system composed by a robotic exoskeleton device connected to a laptop for the audio-visual biofeedback for the upper limb therapy. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) | Comprehensive clinical measurement tool of upper limb functions after stroke. Range score form 0 to 66 points, a higher score represents an improvement. | baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the Box and Block Test | Clinical test of motor function of upper limb after stroke. | baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up) |
| Change in the Modified Ashworth Scale | Clinical Scale used to assessed spasticity. Range score from 0 to 5, a lower score represents an improvement. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giacomo Koch, prof. | Contact | +390651501181 | g.koch@hsantalucia.it |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Giacomo Koch, prof. | IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santa Lucia Foundation | Recruiting | Rome | 00179 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27679565 | Result | Hatem SM, Saussez G, Della Faille M, Prist V, Zhang X, Dispa D, Bleyenheuft Y. Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Sep 13;10:442. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442. eCollection 2016. | |
| 28642168 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Randomised Clinical trial
Not provided
Not provided
The recruiters, outcomes assessors, physical therapists, participants and their caregivers will be blinded with respect to participants' allocation for the entire period of the study.
|
| Sham cortico-cortical stimulation plus robot-assisted therapy | Device | 15 sessions of sham cortico-cortical stimulation between the PPC and the M1 of the lesioned hemisphere and robot-assisted therapy. Sham paired-pulse stimulation (PAS) will be done through two high-power Magstim 200 machines (Magstim® Rapid²). To simulate the real stimulation, the coils will placed in the same sites with different inclination respect to the scalp (90°). Robot-assisted therapy will be performed with an Armeo® Power II (Hocoma), an integrative system composed by a robotic exoskeleton device connected to a laptop for the audio-visual biofeedback for the upper limb therapy. |
|
| baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up) |
| Change in the functional movements of upper limb | Change in the kinematics variables will be recorded via inertial measurement units and motion-analysis during a three-reaching tasks and the Box-and-Block test. | baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up) |
| Change in the cortical excitability | Stimulating a specific area with a single pulse of TMS evoke a so called Transcranial Evoked Potential (TEP), which is a well-know index of cortical excitability of the stimulated cortical area . | baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up) |
| Change in the cortical oscillations | From TMS-EEG recording it is possible to analyze oscillatory activity of the stimulated brain area. Monitoring the frequency band during time after TMS-pulse we calculate Time-frequency Wavelets and from there the TMS-related spectral perturbation (TRSP) as output of the frequency bands (Delta, Theta, Alpha, Beta, Gamma) expressed. | baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up) |
| Change in the cortical connectivity | Monitoring how TMS-pulse spreads from the stimulated area to the other areas, it is possible to assess the effective connectivity that area has with a widespread of network connected. So we calculate the Coherence between different areas and other connectivity indexes in the cortical oscillatory domain, i.e. Phase-locking Value (PLV) and Phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) | baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up) |
| Mohan H, de Haan R, Mansvelder HD, de Kock CPJ. The posterior parietal cortex as integrative hub for whisker sensorimotor information. Neuroscience. 2018 Jan 1;368:240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 19. |
| 27145936 | Result | Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. Epub 2016 May 4. |
| 18524898 | Result | Koch G, Fernandez Del Olmo M, Cheeran B, Schippling S, Caltagirone C, Driver J, Rothwell JC. Functional interplay between posterior parietal and ipsilateral motor cortex revealed by twin-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation during reach planning toward contralateral space. J Neurosci. 2008 Jun 4;28(23):5944-53. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0957-08.2008. |
| Result | Reti IM. Brain Stimulation: Methodologies and Interventions. John Wiley & Sons. 2015 |
| 23966698 | Result | Veniero D, Ponzo V, Koch G. Paired associative stimulation enforces the communication between interconnected areas. J Neurosci. 2013 Aug 21;33(34):13773-83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1777-13.2013. |
| 23968834 | Result | Chao CC, Karabanov AN, Paine R, Carolina de Campos A, Kukke SN, Wu T, Wang H, Hallett M. Induction of motor associative plasticity in the posterior parietal cortex-primary motor network. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Feb;25(2):365-73. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht230. Epub 2013 Aug 22. |
| 17876068 | Result | Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):111-21. doi: 10.1177/1545968307305457. Epub 2007 Sep 17. |
| 30677307 | Result | Morone G, Spitoni GF, De Bartolo D, Ghanbari Ghooshchy S, Di Iulio F, Paolucci S, Zoccolotti P, Iosa M. Rehabilitative devices for a top-down approach. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 Mar;16(3):187-195. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1574567. Epub 2019 Feb 6. |
| 30476999 | Result | Koch G, Bonni S, Casula EP, Iosa M, Paolucci S, Pellicciari MC, Cinnera AM, Ponzo V, Maiella M, Picazio S, Sallustio F, Caltagirone C. Effect of Cerebellar Stimulation on Gait and Balance Recovery in Patients With Hemiparetic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Feb 1;76(2):170-178. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3639. |
| 31023258 | Result | Chen YJ, Huang YZ, Chen CY, Chen CL, Chen HC, Wu CY, Lin KC, Chang TL. Intermittent theta burst stimulation enhances upper limb motor function in patients with chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1302-x. |
| 30202655 | Result | Palermo E, Hayes DR, Russo EF, Calabro RS, Pacilli A, Filoni S. Translational effects of robot-mediated therapy in subacute stroke patients: an experimental evaluation of upper limb motor recovery. PeerJ. 2018 Sep 4;6:e5544. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5544. eCollection 2018. |
| 38129910 | Derived | Cinnera AM, Bonni S, D'Acunto A, Maiella M, Ferraresi M, Casula EP, Pezzopane V, Tramontano M, Iosa M, Paolucci S, Morone G, Vannozzi G, Koch G. Cortico-cortical stimulation and robot-assisted therapy (CCS and RAT) for upper limb recovery after stroke: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Dec 21;24(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07849-1. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D000083242 | Ischemic Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided