A Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Randomized, Dose Optimization (Part I), Double-blind (Part II) Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Azacitidine (Oral-Aza, ONUREG®) Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Participants With IPSS-R Low- or Intermediate-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
A Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Randomized, Dose Optimization (Part I), Double-blind (Part II) Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Azacitidine (Oral-Aza, ONUREG®) Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Participants With IPSS-R Low- or Intermediate-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral azacitidine in participants with low to intermediate International Prognostic Scoring System Revised (IPSS-R) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Inclusion Criteria:
• Participant has a documented diagnosis of MDS according to WHO 2016 classification that meets International Prognostic Scoring System Revised (IPSS-R) classification of low- or intermediate-risk disease (IPSS-R score between 1.5 and 4.5).
MDS diagnosis, WHO classification, and IPSS-R risk classification will be prospectively determined by independent central pathology and cytogenetics review, and applicable central laboratory results.
• Participant must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
ABB, Buenos Aires F.D. C1199ABB, Argentina
Hksar, 0, Hong Kong
Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka 8068501, Japan
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-8625, Japan
Hwasun Gun, Jeonranamdo 58128, South Korea