injection of 8 mg dexamethasone to perioperative region, submucosally.

preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in hyaluronidase control group

preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in hyaluronidase control group

preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in dexamethasone experimental group

preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in dexamethasone experimental group

preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in dexamethasone experimental group

preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in dexamethasone experimental group

preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in dexamethasone controlgroup

preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in dexamethasone controlgroup

preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in dexamethasone controlgroup

preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in dexamethasone controlgroup

edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day

edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day

edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day

edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day

edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day

edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day

edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day

edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day

pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day

pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.

existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.