Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study is to clinically evaluate the shade matching and clinical performance of the Universal shade composites Omnichroma and GC Essentia versus the multi shade composite Filtek Z350XT in restoring cervical lesions of anterior teeth.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filtek Z350XT | Active Comparator |
| |
| Essentia universal shade, GC composite | Experimental |
| |
| Omnichroma composite | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modified USPHS criteria | Diagnostic Test | It assess the restorations with visual inspection using a mirror and explorer. It includes Marginal integrity, shade matching, retention, marginal discoloration, gingival inflammation, and recurrent caries. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical performance (USPHS criteria) | USPHS criteria | baseline: 1 week |
| Clinical performance (USPHS criteria) | USPHS criteria | 6 months |
| Clinical performance (USPHS criteria) | USPHS criteria | 12 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided