Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Bone marrow aspiration from maxillary tuberosity will be centrifuged to separate the bone marrow mononuclear cell layer using the density gradient separation method, then it will be seeded in a platelet-rich fibrin membrane and used for socket preservation to test the osteogenic ability of the bone marrow mononuclear cell layer in comparison to platelet-rich fibrin alone both ways will receive implant after 3 months
-Research question: In patients with teeth requiring extraction will bone marrow mononuclear cell layer (BMMNC) from maxillary tuberosity seeded on platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) maintain the bucco-palatal/lingual bone dimension during socket preservation compared to platelet rich fibrin alone?
-The rationale for conducting the research: Bone marrow is full of progenitors and cell markers that promote tissue healing. Traditionally bone marrow aspiration is done from extra-oral sites. The obstacle in extra-oral aspiration is the site morbidity and the need to put the patient under general anesthesia.
Intraoral sites like the maxillary tuberosity are filled with marrow spaces that can facilitate the harvesting of marrow cells and reduce the trauma of the harvesting process.
Bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMMNC) transplantation may result in higher rates of bone marrow regeneration in the extraction socket and significantly accelerate bone maturation. It is also suggested that Bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMMNC) plays an important role in bone homeostasis within the extraction socket However, Bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMMNC) has several drawbacks that should be taken into consideration like potential pain during harvest, and variable stem cell quantity and quality depending on age which may hinder the usage of Bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMMNC) in old ages.
The bone regeneration ability of that population of cells and the ease of their acquisition render them good candidates for socket preservation. Hence, the current study aims to evaluate the use of Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNC) obtained from the maxillary tuberosity in promoting bone formation in the alveolar socket after extraction.
-The explanation for the choice of comparators: A parallel group of 12 patients with a non-restorable tooth will undergo extraction and socket preservation.
In the current study, the density gradient separation method technique will be used to harvest BMMNC. This method has been used to enrich the isolated mononuclear cell fraction and has been an essential part of several clinical procedures. The density gradient separation/immediate transplantation method is superior to the in vitro expansion method as the cells are minimally manipulated; there is no invasive enzymatic treatment used. This method allows immediate autologous transplantation of BMAC that minimizes the risk of contamination by decreasing the time of cell handling in cell culture
-Objectives: The objective of the study is to find out the osteogenic potential of BMMNC from the maxillary tuberosity in comparison with PRF alone in socket preservation for delayed implant placement
-Trial design:
The current study will be designed as a:
Parallel 2 arm
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial,
Allocation ratio 1:1
Superiority Trial
Methods
. Interventions
Preoperative evaluation:
Clinical examination & informed consent:
Evaluation of the patient's general condition of the oral cavity, to make sure it complies with the criteria required to be enrolled in the study in terms of oral hygiene, pathological conditions
-Radiographic examination:
Cone beam CT will be taken before proceeding with any procedure to make sure of the restorability of the tooth before extraction, checking for any radiolucency to be removed also to measure bone width before extraction
BMMNCs aspiration and centrifugation technique:
Histologic processing:
The harvested bone biopsies will be decalcified in ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (10%) for two weeks. After dehydration in graded series of ethanol, the specimens will be embedded in paraffin and sectioned by a high-speed rotating blade microtome; the sections will be stained with hematoxylin-eosin stain. This will be followed by histomorphometric analysis using the Leica Qwin 500 (Leica microsystems Inc., Switzerland) image analyzer computer system (England). Area percentage (%) of newly formed bone will be calculated
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
real-time polymerase chain reaction(RT-PCR) will be used to analyze the massenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA) levels of alkaline phosphatase
• Postoperative instructions and follow-up:
Administration of:
Patient self-care instructions:
Application of an ice bag to the treated area for the first 24 hours.
Avoid any brushing and trauma to the surgical site for one week.
Avoid smoking
PICO:(population-intervention-compatetor-outcome) P: Patients with non-restorable teeth indicated for extraction I: BMMNC from the tuberosity for socket preservation C: Platelet rich fibrin O: Bucco-palatal/lingual bone dimension Prioritization of Outcome Outcome Method of Measurement Unit of Measurement Primary outcome
Secondary objectives To calculate the postoperative pain, patient satisfaction and Alkaline phosphatase measurement in a histological sample of the newly formed bone took 3 months later before implant placement
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| socket preservation with platelet rich fibrin PRF alone the implant placement 3 months after | Active Comparator | after extraction socket preservation will be done by using PRF only in the socket and closed the socket by flap advancement. |
|
| socket preservation with BMMNCs of bone marrow aspirated of maxillary tuberosity | Experimental | after extraction socket preservation will be done by using bone marrow mononuclear cell layer seeded on PRF in the socket and close the socket by flap advancement |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bone marrow aspiration from maxillary tuberosity and BMMNCs separation to be seeded on PRF and used for socket preservation | Other | Local anaesthesia will be administered by infiltration or nerve block to achieve the necessary anaesthesia to allow extraction of the indicated tooth Extraction will be done as atraumatically as possible removing any pathosis found that may interfere with bone formation A trapezoidal flap will be created above the extraction socket to allow closure of the surgical site. BMMNC will be seeded on platelet rich fibrin and inserted in the socket The flap will be closed by interrupted sutures using 5-0 sutures. implant placement 3 months later |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| bucco-palatal width of the alveolar socket after extraction with millimeter by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) | The bucco-palatal width of the alveolar socket after extraction will be measured in millimeter using On Demand software at distinct level (2 , 4, and 6mm from the cerst) at the time of extraction and 3 months later after socket preservation with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) | 3 months after extraction and socket preservation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| postoperative pain | postoperative pain after the surgery, Visual analogue score from (1 to 10) and 10 is the worst pain -A patient is asked to indicate his/her perceived pain intensity (most commonly) along a 100 mm horizontal line, and this rating is then measured from the left edge | 14 days |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahmed I Yassin | Contact | 002 01063718668 | ahmedyassin2167@gmail.com | |
| omnia K Tawfik, lectuerer | Contact | 002 01118881217 | omnia.tawfik@dentistry.cu.edu.eg |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hani ElNahass | Cairo University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cairo University | Recruiting | Cairo | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21529247 | Background | Sauerbier S, Rickert D, Gutwald R, Nagursky H, Oshima T, Xavier SP, Christmann J, Kurz P, Menne D, Vissink A, Raghoebar G, Schmelzeisen R, Wagner W, Koch FP. Bone marrow concentrate and bovine bone mineral for sinus floor augmentation: a controlled, randomized, single-blinded clinical and histological trial--per-protocol analysis. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011 Sep;17(17-18):2187-97. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0516. Epub 2011 Jun 24. | |
| 26543482 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Bone marrow concentrate and bovine bone mineral for sinus floor augmentation | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Blinding of the participants and the operator is is not applicable, however outcome assessors and biostatistician will be blinded.
|
| Background |
| Pasquali PJ, Teixeira ML, de Oliveira TA, de Macedo LG, Aloise AC, Pelegrine AA. Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Combining Bio-Oss with the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: A Histomorphometric Study in Humans. Int J Biomater. 2015;2015:121286. doi: 10.1155/2015/121286. Epub 2015 Oct 12. |
| 23875876 | Background | Wildburger A, Payer M, Jakse N, Strunk D, Etchard-Liechtenstein N, Sauerbier S. Impact of autogenous concentrated bone marrow aspirate on bone regeneration after sinus floor augmentation with a bovine bone substitute--a split-mouth pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Oct;25(10):1175-81. doi: 10.1111/clr.12228. Epub 2013 Jul 22. |
| 19473102 | Background | Sauerbier S, Stricker A, Kuschnierz J, Buhler F, Oshima T, Xavier SP, Schmelzeisen R, Gutwald R. In vivo comparison of hard tissue regeneration with human mesenchymal stem cells processed with either the FICOLL method or the BMAC method. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010 Apr;16(2):215-23. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2009.0269. |
| 9384430 | Background | Muschler GF, Boehm C, Easley K. Aspiration to obtain osteoblast progenitor cells from human bone marrow: the influence of aspiration volume. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Nov;79(11):1699-709. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199711000-00012. |
| 25052732 | Background | Sununliganon L, Peng L, Singhatanadgit W, Cheung LK. Osteogenic efficacy of bone marrow concentrate in rabbit maxillary sinus grafting. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec;42(8):1753-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jun 14. |
| 24804168 | Background | Duttenhoefer F, Hieber SF, Stricker A, Schmelzeisen R, Gutwald R, Sauerbier S. Follow-up of implant survival comparing ficoll and bone marrow aspirate concentrate methods for hard tissue regeneration with mesenchymal stem cells in humans. Biores Open Access. 2014 Apr 1;3(2):75-6. doi: 10.1089/biores.2014.0003. |
| 26800181 | Background | de Oliveira TA, Aloise AC, Orosz JE, de Mello E Oliveira R, de Carvalho P, Pelegrine AA. Double Centrifugation Versus Single Centrifugation of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Sinus Floor Elevation: A Pilot Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):216-22. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4170. |
| 16734586 | Background | Gapski R, Satheesh K, Cobb CM. Histomorphometric analysis of bone density in the maxillary tuberosity of cadavers: a pilot study. J Periodontol. 2006 Jun;77(6):1085-90. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050118. |
| 30196860 | Background | Al-Ahmady HH, Abd Elazeem AF, Bellah Ahmed NE, Shawkat WM, Elmasry M, Abdelrahman MA, Abderazik MA. Combining autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells seeded on collagen sponge with Nano Hydroxyapatite, and platelet-rich fibrin: Reporting a novel strategy for alveolar cleft bone regeneration. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;46(9):1593-1600. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.049. Epub 2018 Jun 2. |
| 15691354 | Background | Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Feb;32(2):212-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x. |
| 29456635 | Background | Zhang Y, Ruan Z, Shen M, Tan L, Huang W, Wang L, Huang Y. Clinical effect of platelet-rich fibrin on the preservation of the alveolar ridge following tooth extraction. Exp Ther Med. 2018 Mar;15(3):2277-2286. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.5696. Epub 2018 Jan 4. |
| 31217377 | Background | Mashimo T, Sato Y, Akita D, Toriumi T, Namaki S, Matsuzaki Y, Yonehara Y, Honda M. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells enhance bone marrow regeneration in dental extraction sockets. J Oral Sci. 2019;61(2):284-293. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.18-0143. |
| 24066346 | Background | Marx RE, Tursun R. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of autologous human multipotent adult stem cells derived from three anatomic areas by marrow aspiration: tibia, anterior ilium, and posterior ilium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Sep-Oct;28(5):e290-4. doi: 10.11607/jomi.te10. |
| 28817143 | Background | Iorio-Siciliano V, Blasi A, Nicolo M, Iorio-Siciliano A, Riccitiello F, Ramaglia L. Clinical Outcomes of Socket Preservation Using Bovine-Derived Xenograft Collagen and Collagen Membrane Post-Tooth Extraction: A 6-Month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Sep/Oct;37(5):e290-e296. doi: 10.11607/prd.2474. |
| 18672985 | Background | Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1370-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070628. |
| Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Combining Bio-Oss with the Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate | View source |
| Impact of autogenous concentrated bone marrow aspirate on bone regeneration after sinus floor augmentation with a bovine bone substitute | View source |
| In vivo comparison of hard tissue regeneration with human mesenchymal stem cells processed with either the FICOLL method or the BMAC method | View source |
| Aspiration to obtain osteoblast progenitor cells from human bone marrow: the influence of aspiration volume | View source |
| Osteogenic efficacy of bone marrow concentrate in rabbit maxillary sinus grafting | View source |
| Follow-up of implant survival comparing ficoll and bone marrow aspirate concentrate methods for hard tissue regeneration with mesenchymal stem cells in humans | View source |
| Double Centrifugation Versus Single Centrifugation of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Sinus Floor Elevation: A Pilot Study | View source |
| Combining autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells seeded on collagen sponge with Nano Hydroxyapatite, and platelet-rich fibrin | View source |
| Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction | View source |
| Clinical effect of platelet-rich fibrin on the preservation of the alveolar ridge following tooth extraction | View source |
| Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells enhance bone marrow regeneration in dental extraction sockets | View source |
| A qualitative and quantitative analysis of autologous human multipotent adult stem cells derived from three anatomic areas by marrow aspiration: tibia, anterior ilium, and posterior ilium | View source |
| Clinical Outcomes of Socket Preservation Using Bovine-Derived Xenograft Collagen and Collagen Membrane Post-Tooth Extraction | View source |
| Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal | View source |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003731 | Dental Caries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017001 | Tooth Demineralization |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided