Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21-5516 | Other Identifier | UHN CAPCR Related ID |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Lungpacer Medical Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a single-center proof-of-concept clinical trial designed to establish the feasibility of transvenous phrenic-nerve stimulation (PNS) to maintain diaphragm activation over the first 24 hours and for up to seven days of mechanical ventilation in patients who are likely to require more than 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation.
The diaphragm is the main muscle of breathing and for most of us therefore is continuously being used (and hence exercised) when in health. When people are unwell with severe breathing difficulties to the degree that their lungs are needing a lot of support from a breathing machine (ventilator) in the intensive care unit (ICU), or are recovering from major lung/chest surgery on a ventilator in ICU, the diaphragm can quickly start to weaken from its inactivity. This means that even when starting to recover from the underlying medical problem, or from the surgery itself, the diaphragm may be unable perform well enough to take over the work of breathing once again. This can lead to not only longer times on the ventilator (time to gradually rebuild diaphragm strength by rehabilitation and physiotherapy) but also therefore longer times in ICU and in hospital with the risk of complications that can be associated with this.
Stimulating the diaphragm by use of a pacemaker (electrical stimulation) is an established treatment for a number of patients with certain types of long-term breathing problems. These pacemakers are permanent and are inserted by invasive surgical methods. More recently however, there have also been a number of studies looking to see if it is possible to safely, temporarily and less invasively stimulate the diaphragm of patients who only have temporary diaphragm inactivity. This has been done either during surgery or during their intensive care stay. A number of methods of temporarily stimulating the diaphragm have been looked at, but the simplest has been to integrate the function of stimulating the nerves (that ultimately control the diaphragm) with a catheter that is frequently placed into a vein in the neck to enable delivery of medications during surgery and in ICU.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lungpacer AeroPace Protect System | Experimental | The PNS device used for this study will be the most recent AeroPace central venous catheter from Lungpacer Medical Inc (Vancouver, BC). It is an 8.5F 23cm triple lumen central venous catheter with 30 electrodes arranged in two arrays (distal 9 electrodes intended to capture the right phrenic nerve and the 21 proximal to capture the left phrenic nerve). It is inserted via the left internal jugular or left subclavian vein where it is placed in the proximal superior vena cava (SVC) at or above the cavo-atrial junction. The AeroPace system monitors airway pressure to detect ventilator-triggered controlled mechanical breaths and patient-triggered assisted mechanical breaths. In response to detection of native respiratory efforts the PNS lies quiescent. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lungpacer AeroPace Protect System | Device | AeroPace Catheter will be placed percutaneously into the left internal jugular vein or left subclavian vein and stimulating electrodes mapped for therapy. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of placing AeroPace Catheter | Feasibility will be defined as the device being successfully deployed in at least 11 of the 20 patients. Successful deployment of the device defined as:
| 30 days |
| Safety of AeroPace Catheter | The technique will be considered safe if there are no unexpected serious adverse events (USADEs) and the incidence of device- or procedure-related SAEs is below that established in literature. | 30 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| LAPS-PNS successfully achieved at the time of the mapping/calibration procedure on each of the subsequent days up to the end of the study intervention period | 7 days | |
| The proportion of time that adequate diaphragm activation is maintained during phrenic nerve stimulation and during the absence of phrenic nerve stimulation. |
Not provided
Group 1: Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF)
Inclusion Criteria:
Group 2: Pulmonary endarterectomy
Inclusion Criteria:
Group 3: Lung transplant
Inclusion Criteria:
All groups
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ewan Goligher, MD, PhD | University Health Network, Toronto | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Health Network | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 2N2 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41764523 | Derived | Morris IS, Bassi T, Castellvi-Font A, Iftikhar A, Roman-Sarita G, Bellissimo CA, Bootjeamjai P, Zhao Z, Thakkar V, Mehta N, Granton J, Brochard L, Ferguson ND, Goligher EC. Diaphragm neurostimulation mitigates the adverse cardiopulmonary effects of positive pressure ventilation. Crit Care. 2026 Feb 28;30(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13054-026-05870-9. | |
| 40043207 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012131 | Respiratory Insufficiency |
| D055370 | Lung Injury |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D013898 | Thoracic Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is defined as the percentage of hours the patient has an Edi ≥ minimum Edi required to maintain Pocc ≤ -5 cm H2O. |
| 7 days |
| The proportion of hours in which the maintenance of diaphragm activation is due to LAPS-PNS rather than endogenous patient respiratory effort. | 7 days |
| Morris IS, Bassi T, Bellissimo CA, Bootjeamjai P, Roman-Sarita G, de Perrot M, Donahoe L, McRae K, Dianti J, Del Sorbo L, Keshavjee S, Cypel M, Reynolds SC, Dres M, Thakkar V, Mehta N, Brochard L, Ferguson ND, Goligher EC. Continuous On-Demand Diaphragm Neurostimulation to Prevent Diaphragm Inactivity During Mechanical Ventilation: A Phase 1 Clinical Trial (STIMULUS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Aug;211(8):1442-1451. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202407-1483OC. |
| D014947 |
| Wounds and Injuries |