Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective non-inferiority study to evaluate penicillin allergy history in patients with reported penicillin allergy, who require penicillin or penicillin-derivative antibiotic during inpatient admission using a focused questionnaire. A simplified scoring system will be assigned to patient responses, and the total score will be utilized to identify low-risk patients that have a minimal risk of allergic reactions on exposure to penicillin or its derivative. Patients determined to have low risk based on this questionnaire will be offered a test dose (graded challenge) of amoxicillin in a supervised setting, and if they tolerate it, penicillin allergy label will be removed from patient's chart. We hypothesize that at least 95% of low-risk patients will successfully pass the graded amoxicillin challenge so the penicillin allergy label can be removed from their charts. A proportion as low as 0.85 would be a good clinical outcome and considered non-inferior to the expected proportion of 0.95.
In low-risk patients, as determined by the GAAP questionnaire, the investigator will discuss the option of graded challenge. This will involve initially administering 1/5th (56 mg) of the goal dose of amoxicillin (256 mg) by oral route following the procedure outlined below. The total goal dose to be administered is amoxicillin 256 mg (3.2 ml of 400 mg/5 ml).
Patients will be monitored for 30 minutes after administration of the first amoxicillin dose. If no adverse/allergic symptoms (as listed below) are noted, the rest of the amoxicillin dose will be administered, and the patient will be monitored for an additional 90 minutes.
The amoxicillin challenge will be performed on a monitored bed with telemetry and appropriate nursing coverage. The presence of bedside Benadryl 50 mg, Epinephrine (0.3 mg intramuscular), systemic steroids, and inhalational albuterol should be ensured. Glucagon will be added to the anaphylaxis order set to be used in patients with anaphylaxis who are on the beta-adrenergic blocker if needed throughout the duration of the study. However, no adverse event associated with the interference with anaphylaxis treatment due to the use of beta-adrenergic blocker has been reported in literature on amoxicillin graded challenge. Also, no prior study done on the graded challenge excludes the patients on beta-adrenergic blocker because the patients deemed appropriate for the graded challenge are not likely to develop anaphylaxis. The benefit in de-labeling penicillin allergy in this group far exceeds the risk of the theoretical but unreported adverse event. We will refer to EPIC order set "Anaphylaxis" if any adverse allergic reactions occur and medications are already available for use on each unit/floor to combat allergic reactions as standard of care.
The below steps were taken to design and modify the GAAP questionnaire to optimize the validity for use in this study to identify risk of participating in the graded challenge :
Procedure for the Graded Challenge:
Obtain baseline vitals (heart rate, O2 saturation, blood pressure and respiratory rate).
Administer 0.7 ml (56 mg) of amoxicillin 400 mg/ 5ml orally followed by 30 minutes of observation for allergy symptoms and other adverse reactions (e.g., itching, hives, swelling, coughing, wheezing, throat tightness, difficulty breathing, abdominal pain, vomiting, lightheadedness, hypotension, low oxygen saturation, tachycardia)
If no allergy or adverse symptoms are noted, administer 2.5 ml (200 mg) of amoxicillin followed by 90 minutes of observation.
Interpretation
This is a prospective non-inferiority study. Patient characteristics will be summarized with means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges for continuous variables and with frequency counts and proportions for categorical variables. The number and proportion of patients who complete the GAAP questionnaire and are classified as high and low risk will be described as well as the number and proportion of low-risk patients who pass the graded amoxicillin challenge. A one-sided proportion hypothesis test with a non-inferiority margin of 0.10 will be used to compare the observed proportion to a hypothesized proportion of 0.95. We hypothesize that 95% of low-risk patients can be de-labeled appropriately based on clinical reasoning and strong evidence from previous research. First, it was noted in a previous study that fewer than 1% of the population is truly allergic to penicillin with true IgE-mediated reactions. However, approximately 10% of all U.S. patients report having an allergic reaction to penicillin previously.15,16 It is also noteworthy to consider that approximately 80% of patients with IgE-mediated penicillin allergy lose their sensitivity after 10 years. Preliminary data collected to validate the GAAP questionnaire showed about a 0.93 success rate. This means that about 93% of the identified low-risk patients successfully passed the amoxicillin graded challenge. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval for the estimated observed proportion must be greater than 0.85 to claim non-inferiority. Compared to current practice successfully de-labeling a proportion as small as 0.85 would reflect better quality treatment, better patient care, and cost savings. This would be a significant improvement over current practice where fewer than 10% of patients with documented penicillin allergies get de-labeled. We chose 0.85 as the non-inferiority margin because we believe a hypothesized fail rate of 5% and a fail rate as high as 15% are acceptable and not harmful to the patients for the following reasons:
Studies have shown that performing a direct penicillin or amoxicillin challenge in low-risk patients is safe and effective method of de-labeling penicillin allergy. 8,9 In other words, life-threatening and/or clinically significant reactions are not expected in this patient group even if allergic reaction(s) occur.Understanding the minimal risk potentially associated with this protocol, the providers would be willing to sacrifice a failure rate as high as 15% in exchange for the potential benefits offered by this new process. Currently, there is no formal protocol or process to identify and de-label penicillin allergy in hospitalized low-risk patients in any Geisinger institutions.
Only IRB-approved study staff will have access to data collected for this research. Electronic data will be stored on Geisinger's secure network. Any hard copy data will be secured in a locked area.
A data analyst will create and maintain a database for project data collection and tracking in a secure Research Electronic Data Capture system (REDCap). This electronic data will be stored on Geisinger's secure network. The database will contain Protected Health Information (PHI) elements, such as name, date of birth, medical record number, and date of consent. Only IRB-approved study team members authorized by the PI will have access to this database and data collected for this research. These records will be kept indefinitely as communicated to patients and described in the informed consent form. No data will be transmitted externally.
The following data, including relevant dates, will be collected:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amoxicillin Graded Challenge | Experimental |
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amoxicillin | Drug | We will initially administer 1/5th (56 mg) of the goal dose of amoxicillin (256 mg) by oral route following the procedure outlined below. The total goal dose to be administered is amoxicillin 256 mg (3.2 ml of 400 mg/5 ml). These were numbers that came about for significance in relabeling penicillin allergies in patients in previous studies. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success Rate of the Graded Amoxicillin Challenge | Investigators have created a simplified scoring system, the questionnaire, to identify low-risk patients that have a minimal risk of allergic reactions on exposure to penicillin or its derivative, so that patients with low risk will be offered a test dose (graded challenge) of amoxicillin to safely de-label penicillin allergy. If the questionnaire is designed appropriately for such a stratification process, no or at least minimal cases of post-challenge allergic reaction should be noted. | The success rate will be determined at the completion within 1 year post implementation of the protocol. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Allergic reactions in low-risk patients | Investigators have created a simplified scoring system, the questionnaire, to identify low-risk patients that have a minimal risk of allergic reactions on exposure to penicillin or its derivative, so that patients with low risk will be offered a test dose (graded challenge) of amoxicillin to safely de-label penicillin allergy. If the questionnaire is designed appropriately for such a stratification process, no or at least minimal cases of post-challenge allergic reaction should be noted. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karla Frank | Contact | 570-214-4215 | kfrank6@geisinger.edu | |
| Taesung Kwon, MD | Contact | tkwon@geisinger.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Taesung Kwon, MD | Geisinger Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geisinger Medical Center | Recruiting | Danville | Pennsylvania | 17822 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32781047 | Background | Blumenthal KG, Phillips EJ. Positioning Drug Allergy Delabeling as a Critical Tool for Precision Medicine, Quality Improvement, and Public Health. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9):2916-2919. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.07.046. Epub 2020 Aug 8. No abstract available. | |
| 32147524 | Background | Louisias M, Wickner P. Drug allergy delabeling in the clinical setting: An all-hands-on-deck opportunity. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Jun;124(6):542-543. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.02.017. Epub 2020 Mar 6. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
There is not intent to share IPD with other investigators outside of this study or at another institution.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000658 | Amoxicillin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000667 | Ampicillin |
| D010400 | Penicillin G |
| D010406 | Penicillins |
| D047090 | beta-Lactams |
| D007769 |
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective non-inferiority study
Not provided
Not provided
The participants and investigators will know when the dosing of penicillin being administered and increased/decreased.
Not provided
|
| Allergic reactions in low-risk patients Investigators will review and analyze the number and types of post-challenge allergic reaction in low risk patients within 1 year post implementation of the protocol |
| Provider input on the GAAP Questionnaire to Identify Risk levels | A survey will be sent to the providers within the study who participated and provided the GAAP Questionnaire to identify participants who were appropriate for the graded amoxicillin challenge. | Surveys will be sent to participating providers 1-2 weeks post administration of the GAAP questionnaire.This process will be completed within 1 year post implementation of the protocol. |
| Geisinger Community Medical Center | Recruiting | Scranton | Pennsylvania | 18510 | United States |
|
| Geisinger Wyoming Valley | Recruiting | Wilkes-Barre | Pennsylvania | 18711 | United States |
|
| Background | Evaluation and Diagnosis of Penicillin Allergy for Healthcare Professionals | Community | Antibiotic Use | CDC. Published January 16, 2019. Accessed March 11, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/community/for-hcp/Penicillin-Allergy.html |
| 20934625 | Background | Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters; American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Drug allergy: an updated practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010 Oct;105(4):259-273. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.08.002. |
| 24188976 | Background | Macy E, Contreras R. Health care use and serious infection prevalence associated with penicillin "allergy" in hospitalized patients: A cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Mar;133(3):790-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Nov 1. |
| 29950489 | Background | Blumenthal KG, Lu N, Zhang Y, Li Y, Walensky RP, Choi HK. Risk of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile in patients with a documented penicillin allergy: population based matched cohort study. BMJ. 2018 Jun 27;361:k2400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2400. |
| 32768634 | Background | Parikh P, Patel NC, Trogen B, Feldman E, Meadows JA. The economic implications of penicillin allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Dec;125(6):626-627. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 6. No abstract available. |
| 32672891 | Background | Livirya S, Pithie A, Chua I, Hamilton N, Doogue M, Isenman H. Oral amoxicillin challenge for low-risk penicillin allergic patients. Intern Med J. 2022 Feb;52(2):295-300. doi: 10.1111/imj.14978. Epub 2022 Jan 12. |
| 31167024 | Background | Krishna MT, Misbah SA. Is direct oral amoxicillin challenge a viable approach for 'low-risk' patients labelled with penicillin allergy? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Sep 1;74(9):2475-2479. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz229. |
| 32176248 | Background | Trubiano JA, Vogrin S, Chua KYL, Bourke J, Yun J, Douglas A, Stone CA, Yu R, Groenendijk L, Holmes NE, Phillips EJ. Development and Validation of a Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):745-752. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0403. |
| 24661014 | Background | Artino AR Jr, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gehlbach H. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Med Teach. 2014 Jun;36(6):463-74. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.889814. Epub 2014 Mar 24. |
| 28799025 | Background | Brown TM. Design and interpretation of non-inferiority studies: A clinician's perspective. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Dec;24(6):1994-1997. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-1034-5. Epub 2017 Aug 10. No abstract available. |
| 21539749 | Background | Schumi J, Wittes JT. Through the looking glass: understanding non-inferiority. Trials. 2011 May 3;12:106. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-106. |
| Background | Antibiotic Prescribing and Use. CDC. 2017 Oct; https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/clinicians/penicillin-allergy.html |
| Lactams |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |