| Serotype 3: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/ V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.09 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.96 | 1.24 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 3: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/ V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.03 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.90 | 1.17 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 3: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/ V116 Lot 3 | cLDA Model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.94 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.83 | 1.06 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 6A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/ V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.15 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.97 | 1.35 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 6A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/ V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.04 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.88 | 1.22 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 6A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/ V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.91 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.77 | 1.06 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 7F: V116 Lot 1/ V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.16 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.01 | 1.34 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 7F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/ V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.08 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.94 | 1.25 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 7F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/ V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.93 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.81 | 1.07 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 8 V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.03 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.92 | 1.16 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 8: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/ V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.05 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.93 | 1.18 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 8: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/ V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.01 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.90 | 1.14 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 9N: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/ V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.09 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.94 | 1.26 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 9N: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/ V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.01 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.87 | 1.17 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 9N: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.93 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.80 | 1.07 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 10A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/ V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.97 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.85 | 1.11 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 10A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/ V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.03 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.91 | 1.18 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 10A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.06 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.93 | 1.21 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 11A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/ V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.96 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.84 | 1.11 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 11A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.00 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.87 | 1.16 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 11A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.04 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.90 | 1.20 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 12F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.10 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.96 | 1.26 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 12F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.02 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.89 | 1.17 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 12F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.93 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.81 | 1.07 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 15A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.04 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.89 | 1.22 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 15A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.00 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.86 | 1.17 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 15A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.96 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.82 | 1.12 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 15C: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.15 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.95 | 1.38 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 15C: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.18 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.97 | 1.42 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 15C: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.02 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.85 | 1.23 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 16F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.97 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.84 | 1.11 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 16F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.97 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.84 | 1.11 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 16F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.00 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.87 | 1.15 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 17F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.97 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.85 | 1.11 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 17F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.02 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.89 | 1.17 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 17F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.05 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.92 | 1.20 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 19A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.02 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.91 | 1.15 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 19A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.95 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.84 | 1.07 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 19A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.93 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.82 | 1.04 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 20A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.98 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.84 | 1.14 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 20A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.07 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.92 | 1.24 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 20A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.09 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.94 | 1.27 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 22F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.10 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.93 | 1.29 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 22F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.03 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.87 | 1.21 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 22F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.94 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.80 | 1.10 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 23A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cDLA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.00 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.85 | 1.17 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 23A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.01 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.86 | 1.19 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 23A: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.02 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.87 | 1.19 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 23B: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.22 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.00 | 1.48 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 23B: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.98 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.80 | 1.19 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 23B: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.80 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.66 | 0.97 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 24F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.02 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.88 | 1.18 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 24F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.02 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.88 | 1.18 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 24F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.01 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.87 | 1.16 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 31: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.02 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.87 | 1.20 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 31: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.02 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.87 | 1.20 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 31: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.00 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.85 | 1.17 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 33F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.11 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.93 | 1.33 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 33F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.08 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.90 | 1.29 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 33F: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 0.97 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.81 | 1.16 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 35B: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 2 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.03 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.91 | 1.17 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 35B: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 1/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.04 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.91 | 1.18 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |
| Serotype 35B: GMT Ratio V116 Lot 2/V116 Lot 3 | cLDA model | P value for testing the lower bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was >0.5. P value for testing the upper bound of the 95% CI for GMT ratio was <2.0. | <0.001 | Identical p-values for the lower and upper bounds. | GMT Ratio | 1.01 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.89 | 1.14 | | | | | Equivalence | Equivalence can be concluded if both the lower tailed and upper tailed p-values are < 0.025. | |