A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded, Multi-Center, Clinical Trial Comparing Kinematic Alignment vs. Mechanical Alignment Using Medially-Stabilized Knee (GMK Sphere) And Patient-Specific Cutting Guides (MyKnee) For Total Knee Arthroplasty
A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded, Multi-Center, Clinical Trial Comparing Kinematic Alignment vs. Mechanical Alignment Using Medially-Stabilized Knee (GMK Sphere) And Patient-Specific Cutting Guides (MyKnee) For Total Knee Arthroplasty
This is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multi-center trial comparing Kinematic Alignment vs Mechanical Alignment in TKA patients using patient reported outcomes, clinical and functional performance tests and radiographic analyses.
This is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multi-center trial comparing Kinematic Alignment vs Mechanical Alignment in TKA patients with Medacta GMK Sphere knee system using patient specific instrumentation Medacta MyKnee. Patients will be assessed a pre-operative, operative and interim post-operative visits, week 6, month 6 and 1,2,5 & 10 years. There will be a phone survey follow up at year 3,4,6,7,8,& 9.
Inclusion Criteria:
Must be able to read, understand and provide written informed consent on the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved Informed Consent Form (ICF).
Exclusion Criteria:
• Cases of extreme bone loss requiring an augmented femoral or tibial implant and chronic ligamentous laxity requiring a constrained implant