| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) as Determined by Local Pathologic Review | pCR was defined as the absence of any viable primary tumor at time of surgical resection, as determined by local pathologic review. The pCR rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a pCR. pCR rate was calculated for each arm, along with the 95% confidence interval (CI) estimated using the Clopper-Pearson method and the 95% CI for difference in rates was estimated using the Wald method with continuity correction. Participants with missing or no pathologic response assessment were classified as non-responders. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. | Efficacy-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of each drug for their assigned treatment regimen. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | At the time of surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. | | OG001 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab + CP | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion; carboplatin, at a dose of AUC 5 mg/mL/min as IV infusion and paclitaxel, 175 mg/m^2, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. |
| | | Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| | | Title | Measurements |
|---|
| - OG00016.7(0.42 to 64.12)
- OG00150.0(11.81 to 88.19)
|
|
| | Group IDs | Group Description | Statistical Method | Statistical Comment | P-Value | P-Value Comment | Parameter Type | Parameter Value | Dispersion Type | Dispersion Value | Confidence Interval Sides | Confidence Interval % | CI Lower Limit | CI Upper Limit | CI Lower Limit Comment | CI Upper Limit Comment | Estimate Comment | Tested Non-Inferiority | Non-Inferiority Type | Non-Inferiority Comment | Other Analysis Description |
|---|
| | | | | | Difference in pCR Rates | 33.33 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | -33.23 | 99.90 | | | | | Superiority | | |
|
| Secondary | Pathologic Response Rate (pRR) as Determined by Local Pathologic Review | pRR was defined as the percentage of participants with a pCR, major pathological response (mPR), and pathological partial response (pPR). pCR was defined as the absence of any viable primary tumor at time of surgical resection, as determined by local pathologic review. mPR was defined as ≤10% residual viable tumor at the time of surgical resection in the primary tumor. pPR was defined as ≤ 50% residual viable tumor at the time of surgical resection in the primary tumor. pRR was calculated for each arm, along with the 95% CI, estimated using the Clopper-Pearson method, and the 95% CI for the difference in rates was estimated using the Wald method with continuity correction. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. | Efficacy-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of each drug for their assigned treatment regimen. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | At the time of surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. | | OG001 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab + CP | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion; carboplatin, at a dose of AUC 5 mg/mL/min as IV infusion and paclitaxel, 175 mg/m^2, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. |
|
| Secondary | Event-Free Survival (EFS) | EFS was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) that precludes surgery, as determined by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1); local, regional, or distant disease recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline), and must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 millimeters (mm). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for EFS, and 95% Cls was constructed using Brookmeyer and Crowley method. Data from participants who have not experienced such events were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment. Due to the early termination of the study, the limited sample size and follow-up time no meaningful conclusions can be made in terms of median EFS per arm or HR between the arms. | Efficacy-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of each drug for their assigned treatment regimen. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | From randomization to PD disease recurrence or death (Up to 9.2 months) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. | | OG001 |
|
| Secondary | Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) | RFS was defined as the time from surgery to the first documented recurrence of disease or death from any cause. Recurrent disease included local, regional, or distant recurrence: local recurrence was defined as tumor regrowth within 2 centimeter (cm) of the primary lesion's tumor bed; regional recurrence as any nodal or non-nodal tumor lesions that are more than 2 cm from the primary lesion but are not beyond the regional nodal basin; distant recurrence as any non-local/non-regional recurrence. Participants who did not have documented recurrence of disease or died, RFS was censored at the day of the last tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for RFS, and 95% Cls was constructed using Brookmeyer and Crowley method. Due to the early termination of the study, the limited sample size and follow-up time no meaningful conclusions can be made in terms of median RFS per arm or HR between the arms. | Adjuvant-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of each drug and who completed surgery. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | From surgery (scheduled at Week 7 ± 1 week) to first documented disease recurrence or death (up to 7.6 months) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. | | OG001 |
|
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) | OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Data from participants who were still alive at the time of OS analysis were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median for OS, and 95% Cls was constructed using Brookmeyer and Crowley method. Due to the early termination of the study, the limited sample size and follow-up time no meaningful conclusions can be made in terms of median OS and no further OS analysis are reported. | Efficacy-evaluable population included all who received at least one dose of each drug for their assigned treatment regimen. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | From randomization to death from any cause or last known to be alive (Up to 9.2 months) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. | | OG001 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab + CP | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion; carboplatin, at a dose of AUC 5 mg/mL/min as IV infusion and paclitaxel, 175 mg/m^2, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. |
|
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective tumor response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the investigator using RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) have a reduction in short axis to <10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. ORR was calculated for each arm, along with 95% CIs, using the Clopper-Pearson method and the 95% CI for difference in rates was estimated using the Wald method with continuity correction. Participants with missing or no response assessments were classified as non-responders. | Efficacy-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of each drug for their assigned treatment regimen. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | Prior to surgery (up to Week 6) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. | | OG001 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab + CP | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion; carboplatin, at a dose of AUC 5 mg/mL/min as IV infusion and paclitaxel, 175 mg/m^2, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. |
|
| Secondary | Landmark EFS Rate | EFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD that precludes surgery, as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1; local, regional, or distant disease recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. EFS rate was defined as the percentage of participants who are event-free at the specified timepoints. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline), and must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥ 5 mm. Landmark EFS rates were estimated for each study arm using the Kaplan-Meier method, with 95% CIs calculated through the use of Greenwood's formula. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. Due to the early termination of the study, the limited sample size and follow-up time no meaningful conclusions can be made. | Efficacy-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of each drug for their assigned treatment regimen. Number analyzed per timepoint are unique number of participants out of all the assessed participants who remain at risk for an EFS event at that timepoint. Different participants may have contributed data for each timepoint. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | 3 Months, 6 Months, and 1 Year | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. |
|
| Secondary | Landmark RFS Rate | RFS was defined as the time from surgery to the first documented recurrence of disease or death from any cause. RFS rate was defined as the percentage of participants who are event-free at the specified timepoints. Recurrent disease included local, regional, or distant recurrence: local recurrence was defined as tumor regrowth within 2 cm of the primary lesion's tumor bed; regional recurrence as any nodal or non-nodal tumor lesions that are more than 2 cm from the primary lesion but are not beyond the regional nodal basin; distant recurrence as any non-local/non-regional recurrence. Landmark RFS rates were estimated for each study arm using the Kaplan-Meier method, with 95% CIs calculated through the use of Greenwood's formula. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number. Due to the early termination of the study, the limited sample size and follow-up time no meaningful conclusions can be made . | Adjuvant-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of each drug and who completed surgery. Number analyzed per timepoint are unique number of participants out of all the assessed participants who remain at risk for an RFS event at that timepoint. Different participants may have contributed data for each timepoint. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | 3 Months, 6 Months, and 1 Year | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. |
|
| Secondary | Landmark OS Rate | OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. OS rate was defined as the percentage of participants who are event-free at the specified timepoints. Landmark OS rates were estimated for each study arm using the Kaplan-Meier method, with 95% CIs calculated through the use of Greenwood's formula. Due to the early termination of the study, the limited sample size and follow-up time no meaningful conclusions can be made . | Efficacy-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of each drug for their assigned treatment regimen. Number analyzed per timepoint are unique number of participants out of all the assessed participants who remain at risk for an OS event at that timepoint. Different participants may have contributed data for each timepoint. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | 3 Months, 6 Months, and 1 Year | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. | | OG001 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab + CP | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion; carboplatin, at a dose of AUC 5 mg/mL/min as IV infusion and paclitaxel, 175 mg/m^2, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. |
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptoms, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. | Safety-evaluable population included all randomized participants who received any amount of dose of any component of the study treatment. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | From initiation of study treatment up to 135 days after the final dose of study treatment (up to 5.1 months) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. | | OG001 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab + CP | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion; carboplatin, at a dose of AUC 5 mg/mL/min as IV infusion and paclitaxel, 175 mg/m^2, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. |
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Immune-Related AEs Grade >=3 | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptoms, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Grade 3 AEs were defined as severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. | Safety-evaluable population included all randomized participants who received any amount of dose of any component of the study treatment. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Up to 12 weeks | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. | | OG001 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab + CP | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion; carboplatin, at a dose of AUC 5 mg/mL/min as IV infusion and paclitaxel, 175 mg/m^2, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. |
|
| Secondary | Rate of Delayed Surgery Due to Treatment-Related AEs | Rate of delayed surgery due to treatment related AEs was defined as the percentage of participants for whom surgery was delayed due to treatment-related AEs for 2 weeks. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptoms, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. | Safety-evaluable population included all randomized participants who received any amount of dose of any component of the study treatment. Percentages have been rounded off. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Delay up to week after the planned time of surgery (scheduled at Week 7 ± 1 week) up to 2 weeks (up to Week 9) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. | | OG001 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab + CP | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion; carboplatin, at a dose of AUC 5 mg/mL/min as IV infusion and paclitaxel, 175 mg/m^2, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. |
|
| Secondary | Duration of Delayed Surgery Due to Treatment-Related AEs | Duration of surgery delay due to treatment related AEs was calculated on the participants for whom surgery was delayed due to treatment-related AEs for 2 weeks. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptoms, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. | Safety-evaluable population included all randomized participants who received any amount of dose of any component of the study treatment. No participants had surgery delayed due to treatment-related AEs. | Posted | | | | | | Delay up to week after the planned time of surgery (scheduled at Week 7 ± 1 week) up to 2 weeks (up to Week 9) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. | | OG001 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab + CP | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion; carboplatin, at a dose of AUC 5 mg/mL/min as IV infusion and paclitaxel, 175 mg/m^2, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. |
|
| Secondary | Rate of Surgical Complications as Assessed According to the Clavien-Dindo Surgical Classification | Surgical complications were scored according to Clavien-Dindo surgical classification. Complication rates for every grade were reported & scored for participants who underwent complete lymph node dissection (CLND). The Surgical complications according to Clavien-Dindo can be classified into following grades: Grade I: Any complication that does not need pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic, and radiological interventions. Grade II: Complications that require pharmacological treatment with drugs or blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition. Grade III: Complications that require surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention with (Grade IIIb) or without (Grade IIIa) general anesthesia. Grade IV: Life-threatening complications requiring intensive care unit (ICU) management, which may be single organ (Grade IVa) or multiorgan (Grade IVb) dysfunction. Grade V: Complications that might cause the death of a participant. Only categories with non-zero data was reported. | Safety-evaluable population included all randomized participants who received any amount of dose of any component of the study treatment. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants who underwent surgery. Percentages have been rounded off. | Posted | | Number | | percentage of participants | | From Surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) up to 5.1 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Atezolizumab + Tiragolumab | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg as IV infusion, along with tiragolumab, 600 mg, as IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 2 cycles (6 weeks) until surgery (Week 7 ± 1 week) or until unacceptable toxicity or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurs first. |
|