Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Aurevia | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A double blind, non randomized, multicenter investigation
The study consists of 2 evaluations/visits.
Evaluation/visit 1: Takes place in connection with admission to the hospital. Informed consent, inclusion and exclusion criteria are assessed as well as assessment of skin type and inspection of the entire body skin. Pregnancy test on women of childbearing potential, height, weight, blood pressure and body temperature are measured. Questions about demography, health conditions, previous illnesses, nicotine habits. Risk assessment for pressure ulcers (Modified Norton or RAPS-scale) is carried out according to the hospital usual routine. Examination with PU sensor will be performed.
Evaluation/visit 2: Takes place in connection with the discharge from the hospital or 4 weeks after visit 1 if the research subject is still hospitalized. Full body skin inspection to see possible onset of pressure ulcers. Review of the research subject's medical records as well as review of nursing notes from the hospital where the research subject has been discharged from, to find any notes about pressure ulcers. The study participation is then terminated for the research subject.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PU Sensor examination | Other | Device:PU Sensor will assess the microcirculation in sacrum with and without pressure (subject will lay on side and after that on back) the total measurement time is 5-10 minutes |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PU sensor | Device | Device to assess microcirculation in sacrum area to find subjects at risk for pressure ulcer |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of pressure ulcers developed between visit 1 and 2 | This outcome is to evaluate if the subjects that have been assessed as at risk of developing pressure ulcers (using PU sensor) have actually developed pressure ulcers with a greater probability than those assessed as not at risk | Up to 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse device effects (ADEs) | All adverse events (AEs) and adverse device effects (ADEs) incidence and severity following measurement with PU sensor up to 2 days after the baseline | Up to 2 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of pressure ulcers located in sacrum | The examination with PU sensor is in sacrum. Proportion of pressure ulcers that are located in sacrum for PU sensor high-risk group compared to PU sensor low-risk group. PU sensor high-risk group are those subjects who have a decreased blood flow at pressure from their own body, resulting in a "High risk" result from PU sensor. This proportion is compared for the two groups to evaluate if PU sensor can assess risk of pressure ulcers on the skin everywhere, or only in sacrum where the examination is done. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Anna-Christina Ek, RN,PhD | PU Sensor | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Länssjukhuset Ryhov, Geriatriska kliniken | Jönköping | 55185 | Sweden | |||
| Oskarhamns Sjukhus |
Due to uncertainties in EU data protection legislation individual deidentified participant data are not shared. The main uncertainty is the concept of what "deidentified" means. It appears not to mean that the data set of a person is simply separated from the person's name. What additional operations have to be done appears to depend on technological capabilities to re-identify the persons associated with the data set. A common perception is that the technological capabilities for re-identification are permanently increasing. This could have the effect that public data sets that are regarded as deidentified now might become re-identifiable data sets in the future. Once this happens, the sponsor is no longer able to make the publication of the data sets un-happen. This could result in punishment by EU data protection authorities. The sponsor wants to avoid this.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003668 | Pressure Ulcer |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012883 | Skin Ulcer |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Double blind
Not provided
Not provided
The medical device will give an ID number but the results from the measurement will be masked until data base is locked (DBL). The data from the measurement will be available after DBL
Not provided
| Up to 4 weeks |
| Combine Norton/RAPS with PU Sensor results | All subject will use Norton or RAPS for risk assessment of pressure ulcer. The results from these risk assessments will be compared with the results from PU Sensor and pressure ulcers developed to explore if a combination of the scales and PU sensor would give a better view of subjects at risk. | Up tp 4 weeks |
| Compare PU sensor examinations for different skin types | PU sensor is using PPG (Photoplethysmography) to assess blood flow in sacrum. Since light is used the the skin type (amount of pigment and in the skin etc) may affect the examination. | Up to 4 weeks |
| Compare PU sensor examinations for subjects with underlying disease | PU sensor is using PPG (Photoplethysmography) to assess blood flow in sacrum. Underlying diseases such as Hypertension and/or Diabetes may affect the examination. | Up to 4 weeks |
| Oskarshamn |
| 57251 |
| Sweden |
| Medicin-Geriatriska kliniken Akademiska sjukhuset, | Uppsala | 75185 | Sweden |