Fluid Restricted Resuscitation in Sepsis With Hypotension Meta-Analysis (FRESHLY): Individual Patient Data Met-analysis of the ARISE FLUIDS, CLASSIC, CLOVERS and EVIS Trials
Fluid Restricted Resuscitation in Sepsis With Hypotension Meta-Analysis (FRESHLY): Individual Patient Data Met-analysis of the ARISE FLUIDS, CLASSIC, CLOVERS and EVIS Trials
A prospective, individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) of four multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trials of initial haemodynamic resuscitation in patients with septic shock.
This study is a prospective, individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) of four multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trials of initial haemodynamic resuscitation in patients with septic shock.
The investigators will include four multicentre, open-label, randomised, clinical trials:
All four trials have all received relevant approval from a research ethics committee with a locally appropriate method of obtaining consent. These trials are prospectively chosen prior to the results of any individual trial being known because they are investigating the same broad question in patients with acute septic shock across several countries. The investigators of these trials collaborated to harmonise data and outcomes as far as possible across all trials to facilitate an IPDMA.
The aims to provide high level evidence to address the question of whether a fluid sparing/early vasopressor approach or a liberal fluid/later vasopressor approach to initial haemodynamic resuscitation in septic shock results in improved outcomes, including mortality.
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants of the ARISE FLUIDS, CLASSIC, CLOVERS & EVIS trials who had:
Exclusion criteria:
Participants not in the ARISE FLUIDS, CLASSIC, CLOVERS & EVIS trials