Changes in Suicide Risk will be measured by the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R; (Osman et al., 2001). The SBQ-R is a four-item measure of suicide risk. Item 1 measures lifetime suicidal thoughts, plan, and attempt; item 2 measures the frequency of suicidal ideation over the past 12 months; item 3 measures the threat of suicide attempt; and item 4 measures the perceived likelihood of future suicidal behaviors. Items are recoded (item 1: 1-4; item 2: 1-5; item 3: 1-3; item 4: 0-6) and summed for total scores (3-18). Higher scores indicate more risk.

The Measure of Current Status (MOCS) has two parts (A and B). We used Part A, which consists of 13 items that measure participants' self-perceived proficiency in skills necessary for responding to challenges of everyday life. Item responses range from 0 (I cannot do this at all) to 4 (I can do this extremely well). We summed items for total scores (possible range: 0-52). Higher scores indicate greater self-perceived proficiency of the skills listed. Reliability alphas range from 0.71 to 0.89 (Antoni et al., 2006).

Changes in identity concerns will be assessed with the Future Self-Continuity Questionnaire (FSCQ). The FSCQ measures how individuals perceive themselves in the future in three areas: vividness of the future self, similarity with the future self, and positivity toward the future self. Items range from 1-6. The total FSCQ score is averaged from all items and the total subscales scores (vividness, similarity, and positivity) are averaged from associated items (all total mean scores range from 1-6). Higher subscale scores indicate increased levels of the domain, and higher total scores indicate increased future-self continuity. The FSCQ has demonstrated high levels of reliability ( =.85) and validity. We used the total score and all three subscale scores.

Changes in depressive symptoms will be measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Kroenke et al., 2001). The PHQ-9 is a 9-item depression module from the full PHQ with each item representing a depressive symptom. Items are scored on a scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) to assess the frequency of each symptom over a two-week period. Items are summed for a total score (range from 0-27), with higher scores indicating increased depression severity.

Changes in anxiety symptoms will be measured with the GAD-7 Anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006). The GAD-7 is a brief self-report measure to assess symptomatology and severity related to Generalized Anxiety Disorder over the course of the last two weeks. The scale has 7 items with a 4-point Likert scale responses (0 = Never to 3 = almost every day). Items are summed for a total score (ranging from 0 to 21), with higher scores indicating increased anxiety severity. The GAD-7 has excellent reliability and validity (Spitzer et al., 2006).

Changes in quality of life will be measured with the The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS; Burckhardt & Anderson, 2003). The QOLS measures quality of life relevant to diverse patient groups with chronic illness across 6 domains: material and physical well-being, relationships with other people, social, community, and civic activities, personal development and recreation, and independence. There are 16 items with a response scale ranging from 1 (terrible) to 7 (delighted) to indicate levels of satisfaction among the domains. Items are summed for a total score (range: 16-112), with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.

Changes in Intervention Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness will be measured by Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) (Weiner et al., 2017) at each assessment point. These measures are considered "leading indicators" of implementation success (acceptability and feasibility of intervention and intervention appropriateness) (Proctor et al., 2011). Each measure has four items rated from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Items are averaged for total scores, and higher scores indicate higher acceptability (AIM), appropriateness (IAM), and feasibility (FIM).

The Modified COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRSm) contains 17 items that yield four scores. The worst scores for each item within Questions 1-10 form the symptom severity subscale (score 0-30), Questions 11-15 the functional disability subscale (0-15), Question 16 is the other symptoms subscale (score 0-25), and Question 17 is the overall health score (score 0-10). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms, functional limitations, and perceived overall health. We used the symptom severity, functional disability, and overall health subscales.

The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 has 36 items ranging from 1 (None) to 5 (Extreme or cannot do). There are six domains: 1) understanding and communicating (scores 6-30), 2) getting around (scores 5-25), 3) self-care (scores 4-20), 4) getting along with people (scores 5-25), 5a) life activities-household (scores 4-20), 5b) life activities-school/work (scores 4-20), and 6) participation in society (scores 8-40). Items are summed for total scores. Higher scores indicate more difficulties due to health/mental health conditions. We used domains 1, 2, 3, 4, 5a, and 6.

The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) is a four-item measure of suicide risk. Item 1 measures lifetime suicidal thoughts, plan, and attempt; item 2 measures the frequency of suicidal ideation over the past 12 months; item 3 measures the threat of suicide attempt; and item 4 measures the perceived likelihood of future suicidal behaviors. Items are recoded (item 1: 1-4; item 2: 1-5; item 3: 1-3; item 4: 0-6) and summed for total scores (3-18). Higher scores indicate more risk.

One participant was missing item 1 at baseline, so a total baseline SBQ-R could not be calculated.

The Measure of Current Status (MOCS) has two parts (A and B). We used Part A, which consists of 13 items that measure participants' current self-perceived status on several skills. Item responses range from 0 (I cannot do this at all) to 4 (I can do this extremely well). We summed items for total scores (possible range: 0-52).

The Future Self-Continuity Questionnaire (FSCQ) consists of 10 items on a 6-point metric measuring how individuals perceive themselves in the future in three areas: vividness of the future self, similarity with the future self, and positivity toward the future self. The total FSCQ score is averaged from all items and the total subscales scores are averaged from associated items (all total mean score range: 1-6). Higher subscale scores indicate increased levels of the domain, and higher total scores indicate increased future-self continuity. We used the total score and all subscale scores.

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a 9-item questionnaire that assesses the presence and severity of depressive symptoms over the two weeks prior to completion. The items are assessed on a likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). There is one additional item measuring how difficult the symptoms from items 1-9 have made daily life. Items 1-9 are summed for a total score (range from 0-27), with higher scores indicating increased depression severity.

The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a self-report measure based on DSM-IV GAD criteria that is used to screen for GAD and assess symptom severity. The scale has 7 items on a Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) asking about symptoms over the past two weeks. There is one additional item measuring how difficult the symptoms from items 1-7 have made daily life. Items 1-7 are summed for a total score (range 0-21), with higher scores indicating increased anxiety severity.

The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS) measures an individual's quality of life in five domains (i.e., material and physical well-being, relationships with other people, social, community, and civic activities, personal development and fulfillment, and recreation). Participants respond to each of 16 items using a scale of 1 (terrible) to 7 (delighted) to indicate levels of satisfaction among the domains. Items are summed for a total score (range: 16-112), with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.

Changes in functional status as relates to health will be measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, 2nd Version (WHODAS 2.0; Ustun et al., 2010). The WHODAS. 2.0 has 36 items ranging from 1 (None) to 5 (Extreme or cannot do). Items are summed for subscale scores. There are six domains: 1) understanding and communicating (scores 6-30), 2) getting around (scores 5-25), 3) self-care (scores 4-20), 4) getting along with people (scores 5-25), 5a) life activities-household (scores 4-20), 5b) life activities-school/work (scores 4-20), and 6) participation in society (scores 8-40). Higher scores indicate more difficulties due to health/mental health conditions in each domain. The WHODAS 2.0 has been validated in the general population and amongst those with non-acute health conditions and has a Cronbach's alpha of .96 (Saltychev et al., 2021). We used domains 1, 2, 3, 4, 5a, and 6.

Changes in Suicide Risk will be measured by the Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R; (Osman et al., 2001). The SBQ-R is a four-item measure of suicide risk. Item 1 measures lifetime suicidal thoughts, plan, and attempt; item 2 measures the frequency of suicidal ideation over the past 12 months; item 3 measures the threat of suicide attempt; and item 4 measures the perceived likelihood of future suicidal behaviors. Items are recoded (item 1: 1-4; item 2: 1-5; item 3: 1-3; item 4: 0-6) and summed for total scores (3-18). Higher scores indicate more risk.

One participant was missing item 1 of the SBQ-R and was not included in analysis.

The Measure of Current Status (MOCS) has two parts (A and B). We used Part A, which consists of 13 items that measure participants' self-perceived proficiency in skills necessary for responding to challenges of everyday life. Item responses range from 0 (I cannot do this at all) to 4 (I can do this extremely well). We summed items for total scores (possible range: 0-52). Higher scores indicate greater self-perceived proficiency of the skills listed. Reliability alphas range from 0.71 to 0.89 (Antoni et al., 2006).

Changes in identity concerns will be assessed with the Future Self-Continuity Questionnaire (FSCQ). The FSCQ measures how individuals perceive themselves in the future in three areas: vividness of the future self, similarity with the future self, and positivity toward the future self. Items range from 1-6. The total FSCQ score is averaged from all items and the total subscales scores (vividness, similarity, and positivity) are averaged from associated items (all total mean scores range from 1-6). Higher subscale scores indicate increased levels of the domain, and higher total scores indicate increased future-self continuity. The FSCQ has demonstrated high levels of reliability ( =.85) and validity. We used the total score and all three subscale scores.

Changes in depressive symptoms will be measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Kroenke et al., 2001). The PHQ-9 is a 9-item depression module from the full PHQ with each item representing a depressive symptom. Items are scored on a scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) to assess the frequency of each symptom over a two-week period. Items are summed for a total score (range from 0-27), with higher scores indicating increased depression severity.

Changes in anxiety symptoms will be measured with the GAD-7 Anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006). The GAD-7 is a brief self-report measure to assess symptomatology and severity related to Generalized Anxiety Disorder over the course of the last two weeks. The scale has 7 items with a 4-point Likert scale responses (0 = Never to 3 = almost every day). Items are summed for a total score (ranging from 0 to 21), with higher scores indicating increased anxiety severity. The GAD-7 has excellent reliability and validity (Spitzer et al., 2006).

Changes in quality of life will be measured with the The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS; Burckhardt & Anderson, 2003). The QOLS measures quality of life relevant to diverse patient groups with chronic illness across 6 domains: material and physical well-being, relationships with other people, social, community, and civic activities, personal development and recreation, and independence. There are 16 items with a response scale ranging from 1 (terrible) to 7 (delighted) to indicate levels of satisfaction among the domains. Items are summed for a total score (range: 16-112), with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.

Changes in Intervention Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness will be measured by Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) (Weiner et al., 2017) at each assessment point. These measures are considered "leading indicators" of implementation success (acceptability and feasibility of intervention and intervention appropriateness) (Proctor et al., 2011). Each measure has four items rated from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Items are averaged for total scores, and higher scores indicate higher acceptability (AIM), appropriateness (IAM), and feasibility (FIM).

This analysis uses domain 3 from pre- to post-intervention.

This analysis uses domain 4 from pre- to post-intervention.

This analysis uses domain 5 (part 1) from pre- to post-intervention.

This analysis uses domain 6 from pre- to post-intervention.

This analysis uses the FSCQ vividness subscale from pre- to post-intervention.

This analysis uses the FSCQ positivity subscale from pre- to post-intervention.

The FIM measures an intervention's feasibility. Therefore, the goal is not change over time, the goal is to assess, descriptively, post-intervention feasibility. Because we assessed this measure at baseline (with "expectations of the future treatment"), we provide a paired t-test with the FIM at pre- and post-intervention.