Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study is to assess carotid ultrasounds measurements, namely corrected flow time (FTc), velocity time integral (VTI) and respirophasic variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak), as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.
Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection . Early identification and appropriate management in the initial hours after the development of sepsis improve outcomes.
For patients with sepsis-induced hypoperfusion or septic shock it is recommended to give IV crystalloid fluid within the first 3 hr of resuscitation . However, fluid responsiveness varies widely between cases. Determining the optimal amount of fluid to be administered remains a critical issue in clinical practice and research. Recent studies have shown that not every patient advantages from intravenous hydration, only 40% of hypotensive patients with sepsis benefit, and the others who do not respond are liable to develop pulmonary edema with high associated mortality . Studies have shown that aortic blood peak velocity had high sensitivity and specificity to predict fluid responsiveness, however, measurements of aortic blood flow velocity need a transesophageal ultrasound which is an invasive procedure . Measurement of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOTVTI), derived stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output reliably predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients but it is difficult and dependent on operator and echo windows . There is a need to find a non-invasive accurate and easy method to assess fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients. Different Measurements of carotid artery flow have been suggested recently to predict fluid responsiveness. A promising measurements are corrected flow time (FTc), velocity time integral (VTI) and respirophasic variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound and doppler | Radiation | All patients are then assessed by transthoracic echocardiography to measure Left ventricle and Right ventricle function and to assess LVOT-VTI and SV. Doppler Ultrasound assessment of carotid arteries to assess corrected flow time (FTc), velocity time integral (VTI) and respirophasic variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak). The patient will be assessed pre- and post- passive leg raising (PLR) and after fluid challenge of 30 mL/Kg of IV crystalloid |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| carotid usltrasounds and doppler measurements as predictor of fluid responsiveness in septic patient | Assess carotid artery blood flow assessed by Ultrasounds as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients, and compare this measurements to standard one as echocardiography measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output (COP)to establish more easier method for assessment not depend of echo-window of patient and doesn't need expert one to do. | baseline |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
All recruited patients aged between 18 and 75 year old suspected to have septsis and septic shock are to be assessed at time of admission by history taking, thorough physical examination, laboratory workup. ECG, haemodynamic parameters and abdominal ultrasound including inferior vena cava (IVC) dimeter and collapsibility. Sequential Organ failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-II) score to diagnose septic shock and eligibility to enter the study .
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohammed AM Hassan | Contact | +2/01010706790 | mohammedelahmer88@gmail.com | |
| Ahmed MA Obaidullah, asst. prof | Contact | +2/01007556396 | ahmed.ali13@med.au.edu.eg |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. | View source |
| Wu Y, Zhou S, Zhou Z, Liu B. A 10-second fluid challenge guided by transthoracic echocardiography can predict fluid responsiveness. Crit Care. 2014;;18::R108.. doi: 10.1186/cc13891. DOI: | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012772 | Shock, Septic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018805 | Sepsis |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D018746 | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome |
| D007249 | Inflammation |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019220 | High-Energy Shock Waves |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069453 | Ultrasonic Waves |
| D013016 | Sound |
| D011840 | Radiation, Nonionizing |
| D011827 | Radiation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sidor M, Premachandra L, Hanna B, Nair N, Misra A. Carotid flow as a surrogate for cardiac output measurement in Hemodynamically stable participants. J Intensive Care Med. 2020;;35::650--655.. doi: 10.1177/0885066618775694. DOI: | View source |
| D010335 |
| Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D012769 | Shock |
| D055585 |
| Physical Phenomena |