Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Central Lancashire | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main purpose of this study is to find out if scanning the foot using a 3D scanner influences the effectiveness of custom made insoles, compared to the more traditional approach of taking a foam-box impression cast of the foot. Both of these methods are currently used as standard care in the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GGC) Orthotic Department. In this study, insoles will be manufactured either from a direct 3D scan of the foot, or from a foam-box impression cast, and a series of questionnaires will be used to measure any changes in foot pain and foot function. The results from this study will be used to develop an information resource for both patients and Orthotists which will fill gaps in our current knowledge and hopefully guide us further in providing the best possible care for future patients who require insoles.
A single centre, double blinded, randomised controlled trial. Interventional, equivalence Trial design.
Participants will be asked to attend 2 face-to-face appointments for assessing and fitting of insoles, which is standard practice in the NHS GGC Orthotic Department. Each face-to-face appointment will take approximately 40 minutes. Following the fitting of the insoles, participants will be asked to participate in 3 telephone calls over 12-weeks, during which they will be asked to answer questions from two questionnaires (the "Foot Health Status Questionnaire", and the "Orthotic and Prosthetic User Survey"). Each telephone appointment will take approximately 15 minutes. Once participants receive their insoles, they will also be asked to keep a diary detailing the number of hours that they wore the insoles each day over 12-weeks. This information will be collected by the Orthotist involved with the trial during the telephone review appointments.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| insoles manufactured from foam-box cast | Active Comparator | Both arms are currently standard treatment within the NHS GGC Orthotic Department. There are no experimental interventions in the study. |
|
| insoles manufactured from direct 3D scan | Active Comparator | Both arms are currently standard treatment within the NHS GGC Orthotic Department. There are no experimental interventions in the study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD/CAM insoles | Device | computer-aided-design computer-aided-manufacture (CAD/CAM) insoles |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) - Pain Sub-domain | To compare the changes in pain in two groups of participants fitted with custom CAD/CAM insoles manufactured using different foot shape capture methods. Units on a scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes. | Measured 4 times throughout the 12-week period that the participant is wearing the insoles: Baseline immediately after receiving intervention (insoles). 4 weeks after intervention. 8 weeks after intervention. And 12 weeks after intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) - Function Sub-domain | To compare the changes in foot function in two groups of participants fitted with custom CAD/CAM insoles manufactured using different foot shape capture methods. Units on a scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes. | Measured 4 times throughout the 12-week period that the participant is wearing the insoles: Baseline immediately after receiving intervention (insoles). 4 weeks after intervention. 8 weeks after intervention. And 12 weeks after intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tertiary Outcome Measure - Hours of Insole Wear Time Per Day | Patients will keep a diary of daily wear time in hours, in accordance with prior publications on measuring Orthotic Adherence. The minimum threshold for adherence is >21 hours per week | Measured from baseline until completion of the trial at week 12 |
| Tertiary Outcome Measure - Dropout Rate |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Graham Chapman | University of Central Lancashire | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orthotics Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary | Glasgow | G4 0SF | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40121418 | Derived | Barr L, Richards J, Dickson C, Tawse J, Munro N, Scott H, Holland A, Chapman GJ. To scan or not to scan? Comparing the effectiveness and cost differential of insoles manufactured from foam-box casts versus direct scans in treating musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Mar 22;26(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08513-2. | |
| 38569685 |
Not provided
Not provided
Anonymised data available on request via email to the corresponding author
Data is available after publication
For academic and research purposes
Not provided
Assessed for eligibility (n=118) Excluded (n=4)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Insoles Manufactured From Foam-box Cast | Both arms are currently standard treatment within the NHS GGC Orthotic Department. There are no experimental interventions in the study. CAD/CAM insoles: computer-aided-design computer-aided-manufacture (CAD/CAM) insoles |
| FG001 | Insoles Manufactured From Direct 3D Scan | Both arms are currently standard treatment within the NHS GGC Orthotic Department. There are no experimental interventions in the study. CAD/CAM insoles: computer-aided-design computer-aided-manufacture (CAD/CAM) insoles |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Insoles Manufactured From Foam-box Cast | Both arms are currently standard treatment within the NHS GGC Orthotic Department. There are no experimental interventions in the study. CAD/CAM insoles: computer-aided-design computer-aided-manufacture (CAD/CAM) insoles |
| BG001 | Insoles Manufactured From Direct 3D Scan |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) - Pain Sub-domain | To compare the changes in pain in two groups of participants fitted with custom CAD/CAM insoles manufactured using different foot shape capture methods. Units on a scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale | Measured 4 times throughout the 12-week period that the participant is wearing the insoles: Baseline immediately after receiving intervention (insoles). 4 weeks after intervention. 8 weeks after intervention. And 12 weeks after intervention |
|
14 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Insoles Manufactured From Foam-box Cast | Both arms are currently standard treatment within the NHS GGC Orthotic Department. There are no experimental interventions in the study. CAD/CAM insoles: computer-aided-design computer-aided-manufacture (CAD/CAM) insoles |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advenrse event | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Discomfort in the arch area of the foot (n=7), the lateral midfoot (n=1) and the forefoot (n=1). |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Graham Chapman | University of Central Lancashire | 01772894949 | gchapman2@uclan.ac.uk |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 8, 2022 | May 7, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Sep 8, 2022 | May 7, 2025 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018409 | Foot Injuries |
| D005530 | Foot Deformities |
| D005413 | Flatfoot |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D000070558 | Talipes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Foot Health Status Questionnaire - Foot Health Sub-domain | To compare the changes in foot health in two groups of participants fitted with custom CAD/CAM insoles manufactured using different foot shape capture methods. Units on a scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes. | Measured 4 times throughout the 12-week period that the participant is wearing the insoles: Baseline immediately after receiving intervention (insoles). 4 weeks after intervention. 8 weeks after intervention. And 12 weeks after intervention |
| Orthotic and Prosthetic User Survey9-12 (Satisfaction With Device Survey) | To compare the patient satisfaction in two groups of participants fitted with custom CAD/CAM insoles manufactured using different foot shape capture methods. Units on a scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes. | Measured 12 weeks after being fitted with insoles |
| Differential Cost Analysis | A differential cost analysis was undertaken. This involved calculating the total cost for each participant using a calculation of transit costs, staff time, and physical resources for each participant throughout their time in the trial. | Costs were calculated per participant from baseline until their completion of the trial at week 12. |
Dropout rate = n dropout at end of trial |
| Measured from baseline to completion of the trial at 12 weeks, for each participant |
| Derived |
| Barr L, Richards J, Chapman GJ. Comparing the effectiveness of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) of insoles manufactured from foam box cast versus direct scans on patient-reported outcome measures: a protocol for a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 2;14(4):e078240. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078240. |
Both arms are currently standard treatment within the NHS GGC Orthotic Department. There are no experimental interventions in the study. CAD/CAM insoles: computer-aided-design computer-aided-manufacture (CAD/CAM) insoles |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Area of primary musculoskeletal pathology | A review of all relevant medical history from the participant's medical record was undertaken to determine primary pathology, in conjunction with a physical examination of the foot and ankle, including the following standard biomechanical tests
| Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Insoles Manufactured From Direct 3D Scan | Both arms are currently standard treatment within the NHS GGC Orthotic Department. There are no experimental interventions in the study. CAD/CAM insoles: computer-aided-design computer-aided-manufacture (CAD/CAM) insoles |
|
|
| Secondary | Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) - Function Sub-domain | To compare the changes in foot function in two groups of participants fitted with custom CAD/CAM insoles manufactured using different foot shape capture methods. Units on a scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale | Measured 4 times throughout the 12-week period that the participant is wearing the insoles: Baseline immediately after receiving intervention (insoles). 4 weeks after intervention. 8 weeks after intervention. And 12 weeks after intervention |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Foot Health Status Questionnaire - Foot Health Sub-domain | To compare the changes in foot health in two groups of participants fitted with custom CAD/CAM insoles manufactured using different foot shape capture methods. Units on a scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale | Measured 4 times throughout the 12-week period that the participant is wearing the insoles: Baseline immediately after receiving intervention (insoles). 4 weeks after intervention. 8 weeks after intervention. And 12 weeks after intervention |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Orthotic and Prosthetic User Survey9-12 (Satisfaction With Device Survey) | To compare the patient satisfaction in two groups of participants fitted with custom CAD/CAM insoles manufactured using different foot shape capture methods. Units on a scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Measured 12 weeks after being fitted with insoles |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Differential Cost Analysis | A differential cost analysis was undertaken. This involved calculating the total cost for each participant using a calculation of transit costs, staff time, and physical resources for each participant throughout their time in the trial. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | cost in pounds and pence per participant | Costs were calculated per participant from baseline until their completion of the trial at week 12. |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Tertiary Outcome Measure - Hours of Insole Wear Time Per Day | Patients will keep a diary of daily wear time in hours, in accordance with prior publications on measuring Orthotic Adherence. The minimum threshold for adherence is >21 hours per week | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Hours | Measured from baseline until completion of the trial at week 12 |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Tertiary Outcome Measure - Dropout Rate | Dropout rate = n dropout at end of trial | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Measured from baseline to completion of the trial at 12 weeks, for each participant |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 57 |
| 0 |
| 57 |
| 7 |
| 57 |
| EG001 | Insoles Manufactured From Direct 3D Scan | Both arms are currently standard treatment within the NHS GGC Orthotic Department. There are no experimental interventions in the study. CAD/CAM insoles: computer-aided-design computer-aided-manufacture (CAD/CAM) insoles | 0 | 57 | 0 | 57 | 2 | 57 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D005531 |
| Foot Deformities, Acquired |
| D005532 | Foot Deformities, Congenital |
| D038061 | Lower Extremity Deformities, Congenital |
| D017880 | Limb Deformities, Congenital |
| D009139 | Musculoskeletal Abnormalities |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| 4 weeks following intervention |
|
| Baseline |
|
| 4 weeks following intervention |
|
| Baseline |
|