Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Insight Lifetech Co., Ltd. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recently, a new device for measuring physiological lesion severity, the pressure microcatheter, was introduced. The pressure microcatheter provides similar information to the conventional measurement technique but differs as it is easily advanced on a customary coronary wire and simplifies pullback maneuvers. The pressure microcatheter has been shown to provide comparable FFR results to pressure wires.
Insightful-FFR is an investigator-driven, multicenter, randomized, open-label and prospective trial of patients with stable coronary artery disease or stabilised non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with epicardial stenosis considered for PCI aiming at comparing clinical outcomes between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire-guided strategies. The study hypothesis states that the use of a Pressure Microcatheter for clinical decision making would be non-inferior to pressure wire-based strategy
After determining the presence of a coronary artery disease/ stabilized acute coronary syndrome, patients will be randomized to use a pressure microcatheter (investigational device) or a pressure wire (comparator) to guide and optimize percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be followed up in hospital at 12 months and yearly until five years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - PIOS-MC | Experimental | Patients will be treated with the Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will be randomized to FFR-guided stent optimization (PIOS). |
|
| Pressure Wire guided strategy - PIOS-PW | Active Comparator | Patients will be treated with the Pressure Wire during PCI. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will be randomized to FFR-guided stent optimization (PIOS). |
|
| Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - Standard of care | Experimental | Patients will be treated with the Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will receive the standard of care treatment. |
|
| Pressure Wire guided strategy - Standard of care | Active Comparator | Patients will be treated with the Pressure Wire during PCI. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will receive the standard of care treatment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - PIOS MC | Procedure | Use of Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive treatment according to the incremental optimization strategy (PIOS) . |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare the rate of MACE between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies. | Compare the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the combined rate of all cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies at 12-months follow-up. | 12 Months follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare the rate of target vessel failure (TVF) between PIOS and SOC. | In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of target vessel failure (TVF) defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularisation (ID-TVR) between PIOS and SOC. | 12 Months follow-up |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sofie Pardaens | Contact | 0032 53 72 42 30 | sofiepardaens@coreaalst.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Emanuele Barbato, MD, PhD | Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Sant'Andrea, Roma | Principal Investigator |
| Carlos Collet, MD, PhD | CoreAalst BV | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLV Aalst | Recruiting | Aalst | Oost-Vlaanderen | 9300 | Belgium |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41195772 | Derived | Stalikas N, Mizukami T, Bouisset F, Ikeda K, Tajima A, Munhoz D, Mahendiran T, Wilgenhof A, Sakai K, Noorgard B, Engstroem T, Leipsic J, Stefanini G, Bartorelli A, Fairbairn T, Bagnall A, Ko B, Johnson NP, Berry C, Perera D, Christiansen EH, Shinke T, Otake H, Koo BK, Barbato E, Brugaletta S, Collison D, Campo G, Van Belle E, Goori T, Van Nunen L, Witkowski A, Astudillo P, Spratt J, Amano T, Ando H, Sianos G, Sonck J, Andreini D, De Bruyne B, Collet C. Vessel-Specific Myocardial Mass in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Nov 18;14(22):e039013. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039013. Epub 2025 Nov 6. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with one or more coronary stenoses will be randomized to either pressure microcatheter or pressure wire-based strategies for clinical decision making. Clinical decision making for PCI could be based either on FFR or NHPR. FFR or NHPR will support clinical decisions to defer or treat at the operator discretion. In cases with a positive FFR (≤ 0.80) or NHPR (≤0.89), patients will undergo a hyperemic FFR pullback to guide the PCI procedure further. PCI will be performed using last-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) at operator's discretion. After completing an angiographically successful PCI, patients will be randomized to FFR-guided stent optimization (PIOS) or standard of care (SOC).
The one-step randomization process in four groups permits an uninterrupted invasive procedure avoiding the logistic issues related to a second randomization during the invasive procedure while preserving the statistical power and balance between groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Pressure Wire guided strategy - PIOS - PW | Procedure | Use of Pressure Wire during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive treatment according to the incremental optimization strategy (PIOS) . |
|
| Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - Standard of care | Procedure | Use of Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive standard of care treatment. |
|
| Pressure Wire guided strategy - Standard of care | Procedure | Use of Pressure Wire during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive standard of care treatment. |
|
| Compare in-hospital resource utilization between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies. |
Compare in-hospital resource utilisation (cost from all the procedures during the hospitalisation to discharge in Euros) between microcatheter and pressure wire strategies i.e.number of pressure catheters/wires and procedural time needed to complete the procedure. |
| During the hospitalisation (from admission to the hospital until discharge after the procedure) |
| Compare the procedure time between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies in minutes. | Compare the procedure time between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies in minutes. This is the time from first to the last angiography in minutes. | Periprocedural time frame |
| Compare in-hospital resource utilisation between PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW. | In patients undergoing PCI, compare resource utilisation (cost from all the procedures during the hospitalisation to discharge in Euros, e.g. number of catheters/wires) between a pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI. | During the hospitalisation (from admission to the hospital until discharge after the procedure) |
| In patients undergoing PCI, compare the procedural time in minutes between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies. | In patients undergoing PCI, compare the procedural time in minutes between a pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies. | Periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the post-PCI FFR between the pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies in patients undergoing PCI. | Periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the post-PCI FFR between pressure PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI. | Periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the post-PCI FFR between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI. | Periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 between pressure microcatheter (MC) PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI. | Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 (in percentage) between pressure microcatheter (MC) PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI. | Periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 between pressure PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI. | Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 (in percentage) between pressure PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI. | Periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI | Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 (in percentage) between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI | Periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI. | Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 (in percentage) between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW | Periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the rate of symptoms-free status between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies. | Compare the rate of symptoms-free status assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up. | 12 Months follow-up |
| Compare the rate of all-cause death between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies. | Compare the rate of all-cause death between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up | 12 Months follow-up |
| Compare the rate of myocardial infarction between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies. | Compare the rate of myocardial infarction between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up | 12 Months follow-up |
| Compare the rate of unplanned revascularisation between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies. | Compare the rate of unplanned revascularisation between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up | 12 Months follow-up |
| In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of cardiac death between PIOS and SOC. | In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of cardiac death between PIOS and SOC at 12 months follow-up | 12 Months follow-up |
| In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of target vessel myocardial infarction (MI) between PIOS and SOC. | In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of target vessel myocardial infarction (MI) between PIOS and SOC at 12 months follow-up. | 12 Months follow-up |
| In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR) between PIOS and SOC. | In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR) between PIOS and SOC at 12 months follow-up | 12 Months follow-up |
| Compare the rate of PCI-related myocardial infarction (MI) (type 4a) between pressure PIOS and SOC. | During the procedure |
| Compare the rate of angiographic complications between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies. | Compare the rate of angiographic complications related to vessel wiring (i.e., Angiographic dissection ≥ NHLBI type B, perforations (Ellis classification), intra-procedural thrombotic events (including slow-flow, no-reflow, side branch closure, distal embolization, and intra-procedural stent thrombosis, as per the standard angiographic core laboratory definitions) between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies. | Periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the predictive capacity of the PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for post-PCI FFR. | Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the actual measure post-PCI FFR value. | Periprocedural time frame |
| Compare the predictive capacity of the PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for target vessel failure (TVF). | Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target vessel failure (TVF). | 12 Months follow-up |
| Compare the predictive capacity of the PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI). | Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target myocardial infarction. | 12 Months follow-up |
| Compare the predictive capacity of the PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR). | Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR). | 12 Months follow-up |
| Compare the predictive capacity of the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI). | Compare how close the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI). | 12 Months follow-up |
| Compare the predictive capacity of the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire for target vessel revascularization. | Compare how close the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target-vessel revascularization. | 12 Months follow-up |
| Compare the rate of peri-procedural myocardial infarction stratified by PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire. | Periprocedural timeframe |
| Compare the rate of peri-procedural myocardial injury stratified by PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire. | Periprocedural timeframe |
| Junbo Ge, MD |
| Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai |
| Principal Investigator |
| Salvatore Brugaletta, MD, PhD | Hospital Clinic of Barcelona | Principal Investigator |
| Universitair ziekenhuis Brussel | Recruiting | Brussels | Belgium |
|
| ZOL | Recruiting | Genk | Belgium |
|
| Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University | Active, not recruiting | Shanghai | Xuhui District | 200031 | China |
| QILU Hospital of Shandong University | Active, not recruiting | Shandong | China |
| West China Hospital of Sichuan University | Active, not recruiting | Sichuan | China |
| CHU Lille | Recruiting | Lille | France |
|
| Claude Bernard University | Active, not recruiting | Lyon | France |
| ICPS | Recruiting | Paris | France |
|
| Herzzentrum Dresden | Recruiting | Dresden | Germany |
|
| Klinikum FĂĽrth | Recruiting | FĂĽrth | Germany |
|
| Klinikum Herford | Recruiting | Herford | Germany |
|
| Catholic Medical Center Koblenz-Montabaur | Active, not recruiting | Koblenz | Germany |
| Herzzentrum Lahr | Recruiting | Lahr | Germany |
|
| Universitätsklinik | Recruiting | Mainz | Germany |
|
| Nuovo Arcispedale S.Anna Di Ferrara | Recruiting | Ferrara | Italy |
|
| Ospedale Civile Sant'Andrea | Recruiting | La Spezia | Italy |
|
| Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti | Recruiting | Latina | Italy |
|
| Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II | Recruiting | Naples | Italy |
|
| Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Sant'Andrea | Recruiting | Rome | Italy |
|
| Amsterdam UMC | Recruiting | Amsterdam | Netherlands |
|
| Catharina Ziekenhuis | Recruiting | Eindhoven | Netherlands |
|
| UMCN Radboud | Recruiting | Nijmegen | Netherlands |
|
| Dr. Jurasz University Hospital No. 1 | Recruiting | Bydgoszcz | Poland |
|
| John Paul II Specialistic Hospital | Recruiting | Krakow | Poland |
|
| National Cardiac Institute | Recruiting | Warsaw | Poland |
|
| Hospital ClĂnic Barcelona | Recruiting | Barcelona | 08036 | Spain |
|
| Germans Trias i Pujol Hopital | Recruiting | Barcelona | Spain |
|
| Hospital de Belvitge | Recruiting | Barcelona | Spain |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| D054058 | Acute Coronary Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided