Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still considered the treatment of choice for painful osteoarthritis. In the last decades neutral mechanical knee alignment in the coronal plane has been considered the gold standard. However, the optimal TKA alignment is still debated. Today, component rotation measurements on three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed computed tomography (CT) images are considered the gold standard for assessing native preoperative alignment and TKA component position. In this study pre-and postoperative radiographic measurements, functional scores, and biomechanical parameters of patients with knee osteoarthritis will be assessed with the aim to investigate the relationship between deviations of TKA alignment from native preoperative alignment and clinical, functional and biomechanical alignment.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still considered the treatment of choice for painful osteoarthritis resulting in pain and functional improvement. Despite the development of novel prosthetic design and improved outcome, about 20% of patients report persisting pain interfering with their daily activities.Total knee prostheses are aligned in the coronal, sagittal and axial planes during implantation. In the last decades, neutral mechanical knee alignment in the coronal plane has been considered the gold standard. The aim of mechanical alignment in TKA is to achieve a femorotibial joint line that is perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the long leg axis hence correcting any varus-valgus deformity via prosthesis placement with the goal of equally distributing the load between the medial and lateral prosthesis component. However, the optimal TKA alignment is still debated. Traditionally, knee alignment and total knee arthroplasty component position have been assessed using radiographs. However, this method has a low accuracy and reliability because of variation in limb rotation, knee extension deficit, patient positioning, or magnification factors. Component rotation measurements on three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed computed tomography (CT) images have replaced former methods and are now considered the gold standard for assessing native preoperative alignment and TKA component position. In this study pre-and postoperative radiographic measurements, functional scores, and biomechanical parameters of patients with knee osteoarthritis will be assessed with the aim to investigate the relationship between deviations of TKA alignment from native preoperative alignment and clinical, functional and biomechanical alignment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients scheduled for primary TKA | Adult Patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee and who are scheduled for a primary total knee arthroplasty |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D-reconstruction CT | Radiation | Three dimensional CT (3D CT):Method of surface rendition of anatomy by means of a special computer software to capture 3D bone models used to improve the outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Deviation of TKA alignment from preoperative native knee alignment in the coronal plane | Primary radiographic endpoints to assess alignment deviations in the coronal plane:
| 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the Sagittal alignment | Evaluation of the
| 3 months |
| Evaluation of the Axial alignment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Deviation of preoperative native knee alignment from neutral alignment in the coronal plane | Primary radiographic endpoints to assess alignment deviations in the coronal plane:
|
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with knee osteoarthritis who are scheduled for a primary total knee arthroplasty
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andreas M. Müller, Prof.Dr.med. | University Hospital of Basel | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital Basel | Basel | Canton of Basel-City | 4052 | Switzerland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluation of the
|
| 3 months |
| Assessment of Clinical, functional and biomechanical parameters | Functional scores:
Biomechanical parameters:
Local adverse events: persistent or worsening pain; infection; any local event | 2 years |
| 3 months |