Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background: When evaluating trauma patients, many centers perform computed tomography of the head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis, the so-called "pan-scan." Here, we evaluate the utility of pan-scan in geriatric patients who sustained ground-level falls.
Study Design: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients from the trauma registry of a large, urban Level 1 trauma center. Inclusion criteria were registration during the 2019 calendar year, age ≥ 65, mechanism of fall from either sitting or standing, and performance of "pan-scan" at time of assessment. Patient demographics, physical exam findings, CT results, injuries, and patient disposition were recorded. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the physical exam for significant injuries were calculated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tomography pan scan | Diagnostic Test | This is a retrospective chart review |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity of physical exam compared to CT scan and identifying traumatic injuries | Sensitivity of physical exam compared to CT scan and identifying traumatic injuries. Sensitivity is a statistical measure which was calculated using our SAS software as described in methods. CT scan was used as the gold standard. Both physical exam and CAT scan were performed on initial presentation with a time frame on the order of minutes to hours. | 2 years |
| Prevalence of injury. | Traumatic injuries were determined by CT scan, tabulated, and broken down by body region as well as injury type. These data were collected at the time of CT scan on initial presentation. These data presented as whole numbers and percentages. | 2 years |
| Disposition from ED | Dispositions were determined by chart review, tabulated, and broken down by disposition location. These data collected at the time of admission | 2 years |
| Disposition from hospital. | Dispositions were determined by chart review, tabulated, and broken down by disposition location, including patient expiration in some cases. These data were collected at the time of discharge | 2 years |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria included
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A retrospective chart review was conducted using the trauma registry at a large, urban Level 1 trauma center. This registry was queried for consecutive elderly patients (age >65 years) who presented with fall from sitting or standing from 01/01/2019-12/31/2019. This trauma registry includes all patients of which the trauma surgery team was notified as part of the insinuation's trauma notification protocol. It also includes patients who were ultimately admitted to the hospital with ICD 10 codes consistent with traumatic injuries, regardless of trauma team activation. Patients discharged from the Emergency Department with a traumatic injury may have limited data in the registry.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIUH Northwell Health | New York | New York | 10305 | United States |
aggregate data will be published
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided