Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The present study assesses if dissolvable (fast gut) or non-dissolvable (polypropylene) epidermal sutures produce better cosmetic results in terms of dyspigmentation and scarring in patients of skin of color. Through a split-wound study design, patients undergoing standard elliptical excisions at least 3 cm in length will receive each suture type. Measurements of dyspigmentation and scarring will be made at 7 days (for the head and neck), 10 days (for the trunk and extremities), and 3 months for all locations.
Subjects who consent to the study will have the following information recorded on the date of surgery: age, sex, indication for surgery, surgical site, scar length, size and type of buried intradermal suture, experience of surgeon (attending, fellow or resident), and New Immigration Scale (NIS) skin color. Basic patient medical data pertinent to wound healing/scar formation will be extracted from the medical record including history of hypertrophic scar/keloids, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and immunosuppression.
The subjects will undergo elliptical excision per standard of care. A single polyglactin 910 suture buried intradermal suture will be placed at the center of the wound. If additional buried intradermal sutures are needed, they will be placed equidistant from the center of the wound such that each side has an equivalent number of intradermal sutures. 5-0 polyglactin 910 will be used for wounds on the head and neck and 3-0 or 4-0 polyglactin 910 will be used for wounds on the trunk and extremities.
Following placement of the intradermal sutures, the subject's wound will be demarcated into halves, labeled either "A" or "B." "A" refers to the left or the superior side, and "B" refers to the right or inferior side. Prior to the study commencement, "A=fast gut" will be written on 17 index cards and "B=fast gut" will be written on 17 index cards. The index cards will be sealed in individual envelopes, shuffled to randomize, and stored securely with the study materials. At the time of surgery, the surgeon will randomly select an envelope which indicates which side will receive which suture type (either 5-0 fast absorbing gut or 5-0 polypropylene). This size of epidermal sutures will be used regardless of site of wound. The intervention will be applied sequentially with side A always being closed first. A simple running suture will be used on each half. The surgeon will aim to keep suture technique including spacing and distance from wound edge identical.
Following the procedure, a standard dressing will be applied and wound care will be discussed. Patients will be seen, as is routinely performed clinically, for suture removal for the polypropylene side in 7 days if the closure was on the head and neck and 10 days if the closure was on the trunk or extremities. Any residual component of fast gut suture that has not yet dissolved will be removed by the medical assistant or nurse so that the physician observer is blinded to which sutures were placed on which side. The following information will be collected at this suture removal visit:
Patients will be asked to return for an in person clinic visit 3 months after surgery for subsequent scar assessment. All surgical patients, not just those involved in the research study, have follow up appointments for suture removal at 7-14 days and at 3-6 months, as per physician discretion. This time interval is the standard of care. The following information will be collected at 3 month follow up:
Patients who fail to attend the in-person 3 month follow up visit will be contacted by telephone to complete the patient portion of the POSAS and asked to upload photos of the scar to their medical record via MyUPMC. Storage of images of the scars will occur for all patients, not just those participating in the study.
Upon completion of study visits, POSAS, SHI and other clinical data will be analyzed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| A= left/superior half of wound | Experimental | Patients with skin of color undergoing dermatologic surgery with planned standard elliptical excision with wound length of 3 cm or greater |
|
| B= right/inferior half of wound | Experimental | Patients with skin of color undergoing dermatologic surgery with planned standard elliptical excision with wound length of 3 cm or greater |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-0 Polypropylene epidermal suture | Device | Split-wound, intra-individual comparison - half of wound will receive 5-0 polypropylene epidermal suture and half of wound will receive 5-0 fast gut epidermal suture |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| POSAS | Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) outcome (6-60 scale). 6 subscales (which assess scar pain, itch, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity) comprise the POSAS measure and each are measured 1-10. Subscales will be summed to get a total score out of 60. Higher values represent worse outcomes. | Suture removal date which is 7 days from the procedure if the excision is on the head or neck and 10 days from the procedure if the excision is on the trunk or extremities |
| POSAS | Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) outcome (6-60 scale). 6 subscales (which assess scar pain, itch, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity) comprise the POSAS measure and each are measured 1-10. Subscales will be summed to get a total score out of 60. Higher values represent worse outcomes. | 3 months from procedure |
| Skin hyperpigmentation index | 1-4 scale, higher value indicates worse outcomes (greater dyspigmentation), lower values represent better outcomes | 3 months from procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Scar width | Using a ruler to measure scar width 1 cm from midline on each side of the wound. Measurements will be recorded in 0.5 mm increments. | Suture removal date which is 7 days from the procedure if the excision is on the head or neck and 10 days from the procedure if the excision is on the trunk or extremities |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melissa Pugliano-Mauro, MD | Contact | 412-784-7350 | puglianomauroma@upmc.edu | |
| Jeffrey M Plowey, MS, ASCP(HTL) | Contact | 412-784-7350 | ploweyjm2@upmc.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Melissa Pugliano-Mauro, MD | University of Pittsburgh Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPMC Presbyterian | Recruiting | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30869751 | Background | Byrne M, Aly A. The Surgical Suture. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Mar 14;39(Suppl_2):S67-S72. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz036. | |
| 31724097 | Background | Eisen DB, Zhuang AR, Hasan A, Sharon VR, Bang H, Crispin MK. 5-0 Polypropylene versus 5-0 fast absorbing plain gut for cutaneous wound closure: a randomized evaluator blind trial. Arch Dermatol Res. 2020 Apr;312(3):179-185. doi: 10.1007/s00403-019-02009-5. Epub 2019 Nov 13. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002921 | Cicatrix |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005355 | Fibrosis |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
prospective, randomized split-wound study
Not provided
Not provided
Sutures will be removed in their entirety before scar assessment by a co-investigator such that the outcomes assessor is blinded to which suture was used on which side of the scar.
| 5-0 Fast gut epidermal suture | Device | Split-wound, intra-individual comparison - half of wound will receive 5-0 polypropylene epidermal suture and half of wound will receive 5-0 fast gut epidermal suture |
|
| Scar width |
Using a ruler to measure scar width 1 cm from midline on each side of the wound. Measurements will be recorded in 0.5 mm increments. |
| 3 months from procedure |
| Complications | Incidence of surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, keloids, hematomas, suture abscesses, seromas, necrosis, and suture granulomas. Greater incidence represents worse outcomes. | Suture removal date which is 7 days from the procedure if the excision is on the head or neck and 10 days from the procedure if the excision is on the trunk or extremities |
| Complications | Incidence of surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, keloids, hematomas, suture abscesses, seromas, necrosis, and suture granulomas. Greater incidence represents worse outcomes. | 3 months from procedure |
| UPMC St. Margaret | Recruiting | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15215 | United States |
|
| UPMC Shadyside Place | Recruiting | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15232 | United States |
|
| 15253184 | Background | Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56. |
| 30649154 | Background | Sklar LR, Pourang A, Armstrong AW, Dhaliwal SK, Sivamani RK, Eisen DB. Comparison of Running Cutaneous Suture Spacing During Linear Wound Closures and the Effect on Wound Cosmesis of the Face and Neck: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Mar 1;155(3):321-326. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5057. |
| 24048361 | Background | Eilers S, Bach DQ, Gaber R, Blatt H, Guevara Y, Nitsche K, Kundu RV, Robinson JK. Accuracy of self-report in assessing Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I through VI. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Nov;149(11):1289-94. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6101. |