Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a miserable disease with poor treatment outcome. Intraperitoneal administration of anticancer drugs enables an extremely high concentration of drugs to directly contact the target cancer lesions in the peritoneal cavity. However, its effectiveness is limited by the intraperitoneal distribution and penetration of the drug. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an innovative intraperitoneal chemotherapy concept that enhances efficacy by taking advantage of the physical properties of gas and pressure. Electrostatic precipitation pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (ePIPAC) may further enhance these benefits.
This research study serves to determine the safety profile and tolerability of PIPAC/ePIPAC with paclitaxel. It will determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the safety and tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of PIPAC/ePIPAC paclitaxel in pre-treated patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). It may offer a novel and effective option of treatment for patients with PC, who, at present have limited options involving the use of systemic chemotherapy and who suffer from poor life expectancy and poor quality of life.
In patients with histologically proven unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer limited to the peritoneum, the combination of intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel with systemic chemotherapy reported a one-year survival rate of 78%. However, the effectiveness of IP chemotherapy may be limited by its distribution, tissue penetration and associated catheter-related complications.
Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel drug delivery technique for PC taking advantage of physical laws (gaseous nature, hydrostatic pressure) with superior pharmacological properties (homogeneous distribution, deeper tissue penetration). It is applied through laparoscopy and is minimally invasive. Adding electrostatic loading (ePIPAC) as an adjunct would further improve the pharmacological properties of PIPAC since it should induce precipitation of the aerosolized drug, increasing the ratio between the dose applied and the dose in the target tissue.
Systemic toxicity is significantly reduced due to the peritoneum/blood barrier and the low dose applied (about 20% of the usual systemic dose). A systematic review highlighted that PIPAC combines the benefits of a minimally invasive approach with pharmacokinetic advantages of intraperitoneal administration and pressurized vaporization. It concluded that PIPAC is feasible, safe, and warrants further prospective studies. PIPAC may be combined with systemic palliative chemotherapy with minimal additional organ toxicity. This method of treatment avoids the morbidity and mortality of HIPEC. PIPAC has been shown in pre-clinical studies to be potentially more efficacious than catheter-based IP-chemotherapy due to better drug distribution and penetration. In clinical use, PIPAC can be repeated at intervals of 6 weeks to 3 months. This allows repeated objective assessment of therapy effect over time.
To date, PIPAC has only been utilized to administer Oxaliplatin or a combination of Doxorubicin/Cisplatin. Paclitaxel is an approved drug for systemic chemotherapy for several cancers, and also has well-documented intraperitoneal use for ovarian cancer and gastric cancer. It is a hydrophobic, high molecular weight compound resulting in low absorption through the lymphatic system after IP administration with a much higher peritoneal to plasma peak concentration and AUC ratios (>1000 versus 25 and >1000 versus 16 respectively). As such, IP Paclitaxel may be potentially more efficacious with less systemic toxicity than IP Oxaliplatin. However, no clinical data exists in the published literature for PIPAC/ePIPAC paclitaxel.
This proposed prospective study is the first clinical study of PIPAC/ePIPAC with Paclitaxel. It will determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the safety and tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of PIPAC/ePIPAC paclitaxel in pre-treated patients with PC. Peritoneal biopsies will be collected prior to and after PIPAC/ePIPAC to assess tissue drug concentration and depth of drug penetration. Collection of biospecimens including peritoneal tissue, peritoneal fluid and blood will be used for correlative studies including paclitaxel resistance analysis and development of cancer modelling platforms. For the individual patient, repeated biopsies and molecular profiling may also facilitate individualized therapy. For medical research, PIPAC/ePIPAC may deliver measurable progress in 3-5 years because the assessment interval is short (6 weeks) in this disease with rapid progression (6-12 months to death).
This study will determine the safety dose range of PIPAC/ePIPAC paclitaxel. This will allow us to design a phase II trial to evaluate clinical efficacy. On a larger scale, the success of this PIPAC/ePIPAC trial would add a valuable treatment option to our arsenal in the treatment of PC.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIPAC Paclitaxel | Experimental | 3 patients will be allocated to PIPAC arm at Paclitaxel 15mg/m2. If there is 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT), an additional 3 patients will be allocated to PIPAC arm at 15mg/m2. If there is 2 - 3 DLT, study had exceeded its Maximum Tolerable Dose (MTD) and we will proceed to stop recruitment. Should there be no DLT, recruitment at PIPAC 30mg/m2 and ePIPAC 15mg/m2 will occurs concurrently in an alternating fashion. PIPAC/ePIPAC dose escalation will continue until a MTD has been reached. Should there be no DLT at PIPAC 30mg/m2 and ePIPAC 15mg/m2, recruitment at PIPAC 45mg/m2 and ePIPAC 30mg/m2 will occurs concurrently in an alternating fashion. Finally, should there be no DLT, recruitment at ePIPAC 45mg/m2 will occurs. |
|
| ePIPAC Paclitaxel | Experimental | Should there be no DLT under PIPAC arm at Paclitaxel 15mg/m2, recruitment at ePIPAC 15mg/m2 and PIPAC 30mg/m2 will occurs concurrently in an alternating fashion. PIPAC/ePIPAC dose escalation will continue until a MTD has been reached. Should there be no DLT at PIPAC 30mg/m2 and ePIPAC 15mg/m2, recruitment at PIPAC 45mg/m2 and ePIPAC 30mg/m2 will occurs concurrently in an alternating fashion. Finally, should there be no DLT, recruitment at ePIPAC 45mg/m2 will occurs. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paclitaxel | Drug | This is a prospective, two armed phase I trial in a 3 + 3 dose escalation evaluating the safety and tolerability of PIPAC/ePIPAC using paclitaxel in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tolerability of PIPAC /ePIPAC with Paclitaxel by monitoring dose limiting toxicities | Dose limiting toxicities are monitored to evaluate the tolerability of PIPAC /ePIPAC | 1 - 2 years |
| Safety Profile of PIPAC/ePIPAC with Paclitaxel by monitoring adverse events | Adverse events are monitored to evaluate the safety profile of PIPAC/ePIPAC | 1 - 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical response of PIPAC/ePIPAC with Paclitaxel according to Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) | Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) is used to measure Clinical response of PIPAC/ePIPAC with Paclitaxel | 1 - 2 years |
| Pathological response of PIPAC/ePIPAC with Paclitaxel according to Peritoneal Regression Grade Scoring (PRGS) System |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bok Yan Jimmy So, MBChB | Contact | +65 6772 5555 | sursbyj@nus.edu.sg |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bok Yan Jimmy So, MBChB | National University Hospital, Singapore | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National University Hospital | Recruiting | Singapore | 119228 | Singapore |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19605503 | Background | Ishigami H, Kitayama J, Kaisaki S, Hidemura A, Kato M, Otani K, Kamei T, Soma D, Miyato H, Yamashita H, Nagawa H. Phase II study of weekly intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Ann Oncol. 2010 Jan;21(1):67-70. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp260. Epub 2009 Jul 15. | |
| 27803990 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Peritoneal Regression Grade Scoring (PRGS) System is used to measure Pathological response of PIPAC/ePIPAC |
| 1 - 2 years |
| Maximum concentration (Cmax) of Paclitaxel administered via PIPAC/ePIPAC using blood drawn from patient. | Pre-dose; 30 and 45 minutes; and 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 30, 48 hour |
| Half-life (t1/2) of Paclitaxel administered via PIPAC/ePIPAC using blood drawn from patient | Pre-dose; 30 and 45 minutes; and 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 30, 48 hour |
| Area under the curve (AUC) of Paclitaxel administered via PIPAC/ePIPAC using blood drawn from patient. | Pre-dose; 30 and 45 minutes; and 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 30, 48 hour |
| Kobayashi D, Kodera Y. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(Suppl 1):111-121. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0662-9. Epub 2016 Nov 1. |
| 22580869 | Background | Solass W, Hetzel A, Nadiradze G, Sagynaliev E, Reymond MA. Description of a novel approach for intraperitoneal drug delivery and the related device. Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1849-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2148-0. Epub 2012 May 12. |
| 22042585 | Background | Solass W, Herbette A, Schwarz T, Hetzel A, Sun JS, Dutreix M, Reymond MA. Therapeutic approach of human peritoneal carcinomatosis with Dbait in combination with capnoperitoneum: proof of concept. Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):847-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1964-y. Epub 2011 Nov 1. |
| 28407227 | Background | Grass F, Vuagniaux A, Teixeira-Farinha H, Lehmann K, Demartines N, Hubner M. Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis. Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):669-678. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10521. |
| 30911614 | Background | Reymond M, Demtroeder C, Solass W, Winnekendonk G, Tempfer C. Electrostatic precipitation Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (ePIPAC): first in-human application. Pleura Peritoneum. 2016 Jun 1;1(2):109-116. doi: 10.1515/pp-2016-0005. Epub 2016 Apr 29. |
| 29746229 | Background | Ishigami H, Fujiwara Y, Fukushima R, Nashimoto A, Yabusaki H, Imano M, Imamoto H, Kodera Y, Uenosono Y, Amagai K, Kadowaki S, Miwa H, Yamaguchi H, Yamaguchi T, Miyaji T, Kitayama J. Phase III Trial Comparing Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Paclitaxel Plus S-1 Versus Cisplatin Plus S-1 in Patients With Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis: PHOENIX-GC Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;36(19):1922-1929. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8613. Epub 2018 May 10. |
| 16394300 | Background | Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Baergen R, Lele S, Copeland LJ, Walker JL, Burger RA; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 5;354(1):34-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052985. |
| 27981493 | Background | Chan DY, Syn NL, Yap R, Phua JN, Soh TI, Chee CE, Nga ME, Shabbir A, So JB, Yong WP. Conversion Surgery Post-Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel and Systemic Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Carcinomatosis Peritonei. Are We Ready? J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Mar;21(3):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3336-3. Epub 2016 Dec 15. |
| 27766496 | Background | Kono K, Yong WP, Okayama H, Shabbir A, Momma T, Ohki S, Takenoshita S, So J. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal disease: experience from Singapore and Japan. Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(Suppl 1):122-127. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0660-y. Epub 2016 Oct 20. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010534 | Peritoneal Neoplasms |
| D013274 | Stomach Neoplasms |
| D004938 | Esophageal Neoplasms |
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000008 | Abdominal Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D010532 | Peritoneal Diseases |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D013272 | Stomach Diseases |
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017239 | Paclitaxel |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D043823 | Taxoids |
| D043822 | Cyclodecanes |
| D003516 | Cycloparaffins |
| D006840 | Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D004224 | Diterpenes |
| D013729 | Terpenes |
Not provided
Not provided