Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a newly implemented evaluation standard for medical students and is a determinant part of the national competition they have to undergo.
Exam periods are significantly associated with increased stress and anxiety which led to reduced performance, impaired memorization and impaired workload capacities.
Cardiac biofeedback and mindfulness techniques are efficient methods for stress reduction. Interventions that aim to mobilize competence, such as mobilization of inner strength and resources techniques, should improve the level of preparation of medical students. These three procedures could influence the stress level and improve performance during the OSCE.
There is currently no study exploring the effect of these physiological and psychological procedures on the performance during OSCE for medical students.
This randomized, controlled, monocentric study will take place during mandatory rehearsal of Objective Structured Clinical Examination for third year medical students. For examination purposes, the students will be divided into four groups that will undergo identical exams at the same time in four parallel circuits.
Before entering the station of OSCE and before being involved in the research, all the students will receive information about the study and sign a consent form.
Participants will undergo short questionnaires regarding inner resources available to accomplish the exam and questionnaire exploring self-confidence.
Then the groups of students will be randomized in four intervention groups before the examination circuit. All the interventions will last six minutes long. The randomization groups are:
At the end of the intervention, all the students will undergo short questionnaires regarding their perceived level of resources to accomplish the exam and their self-confidence.
During the OSCE, examiner will evaluate the performance of the students. All the examiner will be blind to the student's experimental group.
After the OSCE circuit, students will be asked to rate their perceived emotional performance during the exam (Likert scale). They have to answer a visual analogue scale, to declare how they estimate that the intervention has influenced their performance (from negative to positive).
The final score of the student, as determined by the examiner, will be composed of:
Emotional Performance will be assessed by two means:
The main outcome is the mean score of student objective quantitative score (composed by the mean of each quantitative score of the five stations during the OSCE) at as determined by the university examiner.
Secondary objectives are to compare the effects of the interventions on all the components of the performance score: objective quantitative score, subjective qualitative score, emotional performance score hetero and auto-evaluated. Three sub-scores of the objective quantitative score (divided into communication (C), knowledge (K) and Skills (S) performance) will be compared. Visual analogue scales of perceived inner resource available to pass the exam, self-confidence and perceived effect of the intervention on the performance will also be compared.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac Biofeedback | Experimental | Relaxing breathing exercise coupled with cardiac biofeedback |
|
| Mindfulness | Experimental | Mindfulness guided through a video tape |
|
| Inner resource mobilization | Experimental | Resources and inner strength mobilization guided through a video tape |
|
| Control | Sham Comparator | Standardized video tape |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac biofeedback | Other | 6 minutes of relaxing breathing exercise coupled with heart rate variability biofeedback guided on emWave Pro software on a computer just before entering the examination circuit |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean of quantitative performance score for all the exam | Mean of quantitative performance score for all the exam (mean of the five performance score for the 5 stations of the exam (from zero to maximum: 40). Each objective performance score of a station is determined by a specific scenario grid performance.) The primary outcome will be determined by university examiners who are independent of the study and blinded to the interventions. | rated during the exam, calculated during the first 2 weeks after the exam |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Differences in Subjective Performance | The subjective qualitative performance is the score qualitative of overall performance of each student as determined by university examiners who are independent of the study and blind to the intervention (mean of 5 scores). Each score of subjective performance will be determine on a Likert scale (from 0 to 5). | rated during the OSCE, calculated during the first 2 weeks after the OSCE |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gilles Rode, Ph. D. | Claude Bernard University | Study Chair |
| Marc Lilot, Ph. D. | Claude Bernard University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Bernard University | Lyon | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39752249 | Derived | Schlatter S, Berland A, Lutz A, Shankland R, Barret N, Guillaumee T, Duclos A, Cortet M, Rimmele T, Rode G, Lilot M. Effect of coping interventions on performance of medical students during objective structured clinical examination: A randomized controlled trial. Med Teach. 2025 Aug;47(8):1367-1376. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2431137. Epub 2025 Jan 3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
4 parallels groups
Not provided
Not provided
Performance is evaluated by assessors who are blind to the intervention
|
| Mindfulness | Other | 6 minutes of a guided video tape made for the study that inspires mindfulness like meditation associated just before entering the examination circuit. |
|
|
| Resources mobilization | Other | 6 minutes of a guided video tape that purpose to mobilize inner resources and strength of the student just before entering the examination circuit. |
|
|
| Control | Other | 6 minutes of standardized neutral video on general topics that generates no modification of affects just before entering the examination circuit. |
|
|
| Mean Differences in Three Objective Performance sub-scores | Each scenario has a specific grid composed of numerous items. Each item of all the scenario grid will be sorted by regarding if they evaluate communication ability (C), knowledge (K), or skills ability (S). The sorting of the items between the three groups (C, K and S) will be assessed by two experts independently. In case of a disagreement, a third expert will be asked to choose. Every student will get a score regarding these three sub-scores (from 0 to maximum: 40) | rated during the exam, calculated during the first 2 weeks after the exam |
| Mean Differences in Hetero-Evaluated Emotional Performance | The emotional performance rated by examiners is the overall appreciation of the student ability to control his/her emotion during each station (e.g., control stress, communicate with empathy…). For each OSCE station, the student emotional performance will be evaluated on a Likert scale (0 to 5) by the examiner. | Once - in the 2 minutes after the OSCE station |
| Mean Differences in Auto-evaluated Emotional Performance | The emotional performance rated by the student himself is the overall appreciation of the student demonstrated ability during the whole OSCE (the five stations) to control his/her emotion (e.g., control stress, communicate with empathy…). Each student will evaluated his/her performance on a Likert scale (0 to 5). | during the first 5 minutes just after OSCE |
| Mean Difference of Inner Resource | Numerical VAS on inner resource available perceived (from 0 to 100 : maximum) | Two times : 10min before OSCE (before intervention) and just 2 minutes before the OSCE (after intervention) |
| Mean difference of perceived impact of the intervention on performance | Numerical Visual analog scales (VAS) on perceived impact of the intervention on performance (from zero: negative to 100: positive) | Just 5 minutes after the OSCE |
| Mean Differences of Self confidence | Numerical VAS on self-confidence perceived from zero to 100: maximum | Two times : 10min before OSCE (before intervention) and just 2 minutes before the OSCE (after intervention) |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013315 | Stress, Psychological |
| D003142 | Communication |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D064866 | Mindfulness |
| D006295 | Health Resources |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015928 | Cognitive Behavioral Therapy |
| D001521 | Behavior Therapy |
| D011613 | Psychotherapy |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| D006285 | Health Planning |
| D004472 | Health Care Economics and Organizations |
| D003695 | Delivery of Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
Not provided
Not provided