Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A randomized, controlled study comparing two total knee implant devices, Persona medial congruent (MC) vs posterior stabilized (PS). These surgeries will be performed using the ROSA robotic system. Patients will be followed up to 5 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) performed using a medial congruent articular bearing surface design | Experimental |
| |
| Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) performed using a posterior stabilized bearing design | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zimmer-Biomet Persona Medial Congruent (MC) Bearing Design | Device | TKA will be performed using the MC Bearing Design. The MC bearing provides medial stability and lateral mobility to facilitate more natural motion. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) | KOOS, JR contains 7 items from the original KOOS survey. Items are coded from 0 to 4, none to extreme respectively. KOOS, JR is scored by summing the raw response (range 0-28) and then converting it to an interval score. The interval score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 represents total knee disability and 100 represents perfect knee health. | Baseline |
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) | KOOS, JR contains 7 items from the original KOOS survey. Items are coded from 0 to 4, none to extreme respectively. KOOS, JR is scored by summing the raw response (range 0-28) and then converting it to an interval score. The interval score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 represents total knee disability and 100 represents perfect knee health. | Week 6 |
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) | KOOS, JR contains 7 items from the original KOOS survey. Items are coded from 0 to 4, none to extreme respectively. KOOS, JR is scored by summing the raw response (range 0-28) and then converting it to an interval score. The interval score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 represents total knee disability and 100 represents perfect knee health. | Month 3 |
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) | KOOS, JR contains 7 items from the original KOOS survey. Items are coded from 0 to 4, none to extreme respectively. KOOS, JR is scored by summing the raw response (range 0-28) and then converting it to an interval score. The interval score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 represents total knee disability and 100 represents perfect knee health. | Year 1 |
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Average gait speed | Baseline, Year 2 | |
| Change in Average daily step count | Baseline, Year 2 | |
| Change in Average daily flight count |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinay Aggarwal, MD | Contact | 202 250 0679 | Vinay.Aggarwal@nyulangone.org | |
| Daniel Waren | Contact | 954 559 2251 | Daniel.Waren@nyulangone.org |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Vinay Aggarwal, MD | NYU Langone Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYU Langone Health | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be shared upon reasonable request.
Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
The investigator who proposed to use the data will have access to the data upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to Vinay.Aggarwal@nyulangone.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Zimmer-Biomet Persona Posterior-Stabilized (PS) Bearing Design | Device | TKA will be performed using the PS Bearing Design. The PS bearings are designed to provide ±1.5 degrees varus/valgus constraint and ± 5.5 degrees internal/external rotation constraint. |
|
KOOS, JR contains 7 items from the original KOOS survey. Items are coded from 0 to 4, none to extreme respectively. KOOS, JR is scored by summing the raw response (range 0-28) and then converting it to an interval score. The interval score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 represents total knee disability and 100 represents perfect knee health. |
| Year 2 |
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) | KOOS, JR contains 7 items from the original KOOS survey. Items are coded from 0 to 4, none to extreme respectively. KOOS, JR is scored by summing the raw response (range 0-28) and then converting it to an interval score. The interval score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 represents total knee disability and 100 represents perfect knee health. | Year 5 |
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) | KOOS, JR contains 7 items from the original KOOS survey. Items are coded from 0 to 4, none to extreme respectively. KOOS, JR is scored by summing the raw response (range 0-28) and then converting it to an interval score. The interval score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 represents total knee disability and 100 represents perfect knee health. | Year 10 |
| Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) | KOOS, JR contains 7 items from the original KOOS survey. Items are coded from 0 to 4, none to extreme respectively. KOOS, JR is scored by summing the raw response (range 0-28) and then converting it to an interval score. The interval score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 represents total knee disability and 100 represents perfect knee health. | Year 20 |
| Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) | FJS is a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment. FJS consists of 12 questions - the total score range is 0-100. The higher the score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint when performing daily activities. | Baseline |
| Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) | FJS is a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment. FJS consists of 12 questions - the total score range is 0-100. The higher the score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint when performing daily activities. | Week 6 |
| Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) | FJS is a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment. FJS consists of 12 questions - the total score range is 0-100. The higher the score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint when performing daily activities. | Month 3 |
| Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) | FJS is a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment. FJS consists of 12 questions - the total score range is 0-100. The higher the score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint when performing daily activities. | Year 1 |
| Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) | FJS is a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment. FJS consists of 12 questions - the total score range is 0-100. The higher the score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint when performing daily activities. | Year 2 |
| Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) | FJS is a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment. FJS consists of 12 questions - the total score range is 0-100. The higher the score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint when performing daily activities. | Year 5 |
| Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) | FJS is a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment. FJS consists of 12 questions - the total score range is 0-100. The higher the score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint when performing daily activities. | Year 10 |
| Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) | FJS is a patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to "forget" about their affected joint after surgery or treatment. FJS consists of 12 questions - the total score range is 0-100. The higher the score, the less the patient is aware of their affected joint when performing daily activities. | Year 20 |
| European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Score | The EQ-5D comprises five questions on mobility, self care, pain, usual activities, and psychological status with three possible answers for each item (1=no problem, 2=moderate problem, 3=severe problem. A summary index with a maximum score of 1 can be derived from these five dimensions by conversion with a table of scores. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, by contrast with the scores of individual questions, where higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems. In addition, there is a visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate the general health status (0-100) with 100 indicating the best health status. | Baseline |
| European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Score | The EQ-5D comprises five questions on mobility, self care, pain, usual activities, and psychological status with three possible answers for each item (1=no problem, 2=moderate problem, 3=severe problem. A summary index with a maximum score of 1 can be derived from these five dimensions by conversion with a table of scores. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, by contrast with the scores of individual questions, where higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems. In addition, there is a visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate the general health status (0-100) with 100 indicating the best health status. | Week 6 |
| European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Score | The EQ-5D comprises five questions on mobility, self care, pain, usual activities, and psychological status with three possible answers for each item (1=no problem, 2=moderate problem, 3=severe problem. A summary index with a maximum score of 1 can be derived from these five dimensions by conversion with a table of scores. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, by contrast with the scores of individual questions, where higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems. In addition, there is a visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate the general health status (0-100) with 100 indicating the best health status. | Month 3 |
| European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Score | The EQ-5D comprises five questions on mobility, self care, pain, usual activities, and psychological status with three possible answers for each item (1=no problem, 2=moderate problem, 3=severe problem. A summary index with a maximum score of 1 can be derived from these five dimensions by conversion with a table of scores. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, by contrast with the scores of individual questions, where higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems. In addition, there is a visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate the general health status (0-100) with 100 indicating the best health status. | Year 1 |
| European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Score | The EQ-5D comprises five questions on mobility, self care, pain, usual activities, and psychological status with three possible answers for each item (1=no problem, 2=moderate problem, 3=severe problem. A summary index with a maximum score of 1 can be derived from these five dimensions by conversion with a table of scores. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, by contrast with the scores of individual questions, where higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems. In addition, there is a visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate the general health status (0-100) with 100 indicating the best health status. | Year 2 |
| European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Score | The EQ-5D comprises five questions on mobility, self care, pain, usual activities, and psychological status with three possible answers for each item (1=no problem, 2=moderate problem, 3=severe problem. A summary index with a maximum score of 1 can be derived from these five dimensions by conversion with a table of scores. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, by contrast with the scores of individual questions, where higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems. In addition, there is a visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate the general health status (0-100) with 100 indicating the best health status. | Year 5 |
| European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Score | The EQ-5D comprises five questions on mobility, self care, pain, usual activities, and psychological status with three possible answers for each item (1=no problem, 2=moderate problem, 3=severe problem. A summary index with a maximum score of 1 can be derived from these five dimensions by conversion with a table of scores. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, by contrast with the scores of individual questions, where higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems. In addition, there is a visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate the general health status (0-100) with 100 indicating the best health status. | Year 10 |
| European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Score | The EQ-5D comprises five questions on mobility, self care, pain, usual activities, and psychological status with three possible answers for each item (1=no problem, 2=moderate problem, 3=severe problem. A summary index with a maximum score of 1 can be derived from these five dimensions by conversion with a table of scores. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best health state, by contrast with the scores of individual questions, where higher scores indicate more severe or frequent problems. In addition, there is a visual analogue scale (VAS) to indicate the general health status (0-100) with 100 indicating the best health status. | Year 20 |
| Baseline, Year 2 |