Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 310695 | Registry Identifier | IRAS |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Incisional Hernia (IH) is a common complication of abdominal surgery and causes serious morbidity to patients. IH formation is multifactorial and its risk varies from patient to patient. Risk-predictive tools have been developed to identify patients at high risk of IH before their initial operation, with high-risk patients possibly being offered the use of prophylactic mesh, placed at the end of the operation to prevent IH from forming. With controversy surrounding the use of mesh in other types of surgery, however, it is not known if mesh use is acceptable to patients. This study aims to assess how patients feel about prophylactic mesh and whether it is acceptable to them.
Incisional hernias are bulges through the abdominal wall that occur at the site of previous surgery. They are common, affecting between 12-20% of patients undergoing abdominal surgery, can pose a significant cost to the NHS and cause serious morbidity to patients.
Risk-prediction tools are being developed with the aim of working out a person's risk of developing an incisional hernia before their operation. It is hoped that this will allow surgeons to give patients an idea of what their risk is before the operation happens so that patients can understand if they are at high, medium or low risk, and what they might be able to do about it before the operation.
For patients that are "high risk" for developing an incisional hernia, it may be possible to use a synthetic mesh, similar to those used to fix groin hernias. This would be placed in the wound at the end of the initial operation to strengthen the wound to try and reduce the chance of developing an incisional hernia, however to date, no studies have looked at whether patients would find this acceptable.
This study aims to establish whether mesh placed to prevent hernias during the initial surgery would be acceptable to patients. This, in turn, can be used to inform the design of future research studies surrounding the use of surgical mesh.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with Incisional Hernia | Patients who have undergone elective or emergency colonic resection between 2017 and 2020 at Cardiff and Vale UHB, who have subsequently received a diagnosis of Incisional Hernia. One-off self-completed patient questionnaire upon enrolment. Sub-set will be invited to participant in qualitative interview. | ||
| Patients without Incisional Hernia | Patients who have undergone elective or emergency colonic resection between 2017 and 2020 at Cardiff and Vale UHB, who have not subsequently been diagnosed with (or suspected of having) incisional hernia. One-off self-completed patient questionnaire upon enrolment. Sub-set will be invited to participant in qualitative interview. | ||
| Patients due to undergo surgery | Patients who are due to undergo elective colonic surgery within Cardiff and Vale UHB, who have an unknown risk of- , and may or may not go on to develop-, incisional hernia. One-off self-completed patient questionnaire upon enrolment. Sub-set will be invited to participant in qualitative interview. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of prophylactic surgical mesh use to patients | A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods will explore patient perceptions of prophylactic mesh. Non-validated questionnaire developed based on Health Belief Model Theory, consisting of multiple 5-point Likert scale (min.1, max. 5), used in combination with semi-structured interviews to evaluate: A) Understanding of surgical mesh B) Perceptions of surgical mesh risk C) Perceptions of surgical mesh benefit | 12 months |
| Impact of incisional hernia risk scores on surgical mesh acceptibility | A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods will explore how incisional hernia risk impacts perception of surgical mesh use Non-validated questionnaire developed based on Health Belief Model Theory, consisting of multiple 5-point Likert scale (min.1, max. 5), used in combination with semi-structured interviews to evaluate: A) Perception of risk in relation to incisional hernia B) Perception of personalised risk scoring C) Impact of A) and B) on surgical mesh use | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient understanding of Incisional Hernia | Patient-reported understanding of incisional hernia will be assessed using non-validated questionnaire, developed based on the Health Belief Model Theory. Multiple 5-point Likert scale questions, where 1 (min.) represents least perceived understanding possible and 5 (max.) represents most perceived understanding possible. | 9 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Group 1 Patients who have previously undergone abdominal surgery, and subsequently developed incisional hernia.
Where possible, patients will only be approached to participate where their clinical record indicates they are aware that they have a diagnosis of incisional hernia.
Group 2 Patients who have undergone abdominal surgery, but have not subsequently developed incisional hernia.
Group 3 Patients who are due to undergo abdominal surgery, who may or may not subsequently develop incisional hernia.
Where possible, attempts will be made to identify patients undergoing colonic resection for benign disease.
Exclusion Criteria:
All participants (groups 1, 2 & 3)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In order to explore patient perceptions of surgical mesh use in the context of incisional hernia prevention, we will identify three groups of patients, from the department of surgery, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board:
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Julie Cornish | Cardiff and Vale University Health Board | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie Cornish | Cardiff | CF14 4XW | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36585153 | Derived | Smith L, Meggy A, Watts T, Knight L, Torkington J, Cornish J. Incisional hernia prevention: risk-benefit from a patient perspective (INVITE) - protocol for a single-centre, mixed-methods, cross-sectional study aiming to determine if using prophylactic mesh in incisional hernia prevention is acceptable to patients. BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 30;12(12):e069568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069568. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069290 | Incisional Hernia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006547 | Hernia |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Factors that modify acceptability of surgical mesh | Semi-structured interviews will use qualitative research techniques to explore factors that impact patient acceptability of surgical mesh . | 9 months |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |