Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Comparison on radiotherapy skin set-up markings with lancets versus Comfort Marker 2.0®
A Prospective, unicentric, randomized, controlled, parallel, double-blinded, cohort study comparing radiotherapy skin set-up markings with lancets versus electric marking device (Comfort Marker 2.0® by CIVCO®)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lancets | Active Comparator |
| |
| Comfort Marker 2.0 | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comfort Marker 2.0 | Device | The set-up markings are created during the simulation session, after the CT simulation is acquired. For the experimental group, patients' markings are tattooed using an electric marking device developed for set-up marking, the Comfort Marker 2.0® (CM), designed by CIVCO medical solutions, using the 0.2mm deep application depth and the brand-included black pigment. After cleaning the excess ink, if the tattooing was considered unsuccessful, the process was repeated. Markings arrangement followed our departmental protocol. No limit on the maximum number of cutaneous reference points is specified. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patients' comfort | Comfort is verbally assessed on the 11-point numeric pain scale. As more than one reference point is tattooed, the patients are asked to give an overall score to the procedure. | Day 1 |
| Effectiveness | Effectiveness is assessed by the RTT team that delivered the daily fractions. Skin markings are individually evaluated at several periods, specifically at the first fraction, then every 5 fractions, and one last time in the last fraction of RT. These evaluations are scored on a 4-point graded scale (corresponding to bad, reasonable, good, and excellent). | up to 7 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| RTTs' satisfaction | The RTT that executed the tattooing is asked to score the ease of the process on a three-point scale (easy, medium, and hard). | Day 1 |
| Cosmesis | A photographic assessment is performed. Every set-up marking is individually photographed on one of the last three days of treatment. All photographs are scored by independent observers (both physicians and RTTs) blind to patient identity and treatment allocation, on a five-point scale (corresponding from bad to excellent cosmesis). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tattoo fading | A photographic assessment is performed. Every set-up marking is individually photographed a. All photographs are scored by indepe6 months after completion of the RT. All photographs are scored by independent observers(both physicians and RTTs) blind to patient identity and treatment allocation, on a five-point scale (corresponding from bad to excellent fading). | 6 months from the end of irradiation |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instituto PortuguĂªs de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Genti | Porto | 4200-072 | Portugal |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38292889 | Derived | Pires AM, Carvalho L, Santos AC, Vilaca AM, Coelho AR, Oliveira C, Costa C, Fernandes F, Moreira L, Lima J, Vieira R, Ferraz MJ, Silva M, Silva P, Matias R, Zorro S, Costa S, Sarandao S, Barros AF. Radiation Therapy Skin Marking with Lancets Versus Electric Marking Pen (COMFORTATTOO)-6 Months Results on Cosmesis, Fading, and Patients' Satisfaction From a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Nov 5;9(3):101404. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101404. eCollection 2024 Mar. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Nov 20, 2022 | |
| Reset | Sep 27, 2023 |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_ICF | Yes | No | Yes | Study Protocol and Informed Consent Form | Apr 10, 2021 | May 9, 2022 | Prot_ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2022 | Sep 27, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Lancets | Device | The set-up markings are created during the simulation session, after the CT simulation is acquired. For the control group, patients' markings are tattooed using a 28-gauge disposable lancet and india ink. After cleaning the excess ink, if the tattooing was considered unsuccessful, the process was repeated. Markings arrangement followed our departmental protocol. No limit on the maximum number of cutaneous reference points is specified. |
|
| one of the last three days of irradiation |