Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Anorexia nervosa is a severe psychiatric disorder associated with food avoidance and body image distortion, that is feeling fat despite being underweight. It is the third most common chronic illness among adolescent females, and its mortality reaches its peak between the ages 16 and 29 years old. There are very few treatments for anorexia nervosa and especially no biological treatments have been approved. Recent brain imaging research has repeatedly implicated brain circuits that include the insula in the disorder. The insula is a brain region important in taste processing as well as in the integration of body perception and has strong connections to the brain reward system. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a relatively new methodology that has been shown to alter neurocircuitry and alleviate depression. Here, the study goal is to develop TMS as a methodology to change altered neurocircuitry in anorexia nervosa and alleviate disorder specific behaviors.
The goals for this study are 1) to test the feasibility of iTBS in AN and 2) to gather pilot data to as proof of concept of its effectiveness in AN prior to applying for larger funding to the NIH.
Subjects will complete a battery of self-assessments and a diagnostic assessment in order to determine eligibility and for characterization of behavior to be used in later analyses. After eligibility is confirmed, subjects will take part in iTBS treatment over either 1 week (active iTBS groups) or 2 weeks, (1 week sham treatment group, followed by 1 week active iTBS).
The design will be a randomized control design that also includes a cross over design. Subjects will be randomized to either Group 1, Active iTBS, or Group 2, Sham/Active iTBS.
Group 1 will receive active iTBS over 5 days, with 10 brief sessions per day (5 study days/50 session total). Group 2 will receive Sham over 5 days, with 10 brief sessions per day, and this will be followed by active iTBS over 5 days, with 10 brief sessions per day (20 study days/100 session total).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active iTBS | Experimental | rTMS treatments will employ the Brainsway stimulator (Brainsway Ltd, Israel). Prior to the first treatment (no more than 5 days prior), each subject's motor threshold (MT) will first be determined according to published methods (Schutter, van Honk, 2006; Julkunen et al, 2009). This location, as well as the stimulation target spot, will be marked at the first session on the scalp and standard methods will be used to target this spot during treatment sessions. The modified BeamF3 scalp heuristic will be used to localize the treatment site over the left DLPFC (Mir-Moghtadaei et al., 2015). Subjects will complete 5 treatments days. A treatment day will consist of 10 treatment sessions with the start of each session timed to be at least 50 minutes from the previous session. |
|
| Sham iTBS | Sham Comparator | The BrainsWay Model 104 with H4 coil has an integrated sham coil. The sham condition will start with the same clicking noise as the active TMS condition. Every helmet has a corresponding sham H-coil encased in the same helmet. The sham coil induces only a negligible sub-threshold field in the brain while making an identical noise and inducing some scalp sensation. Subjects will complete 5 treatments days. A treatment day will consist of 10 treatment sessions with the start of each session timed to be at least 50 minutes from the previous session. Subjects in this arm will have the option of receiving the Active iTBS protocol after they complete the 5 days of 10 daily treatment sessions. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rTMS treatment using BrainsWay Model 104 system with H1-Coil | Device | 5 days of 10 daily sessions of rTMS treatment |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of TMS sessions | To establish feasibility of iTBS in anorexia nervosa the investigator will assess the following: total percent of sessions completed by the subject. | at study completion, up to 2 weeks |
| Acceptability of TMS procedures | To establish acceptability of iTBS in anorexia nervosa the investigator will assess the following: subjects will be asked open-ended questions about the subject's experience of the study. | at study completion, up to 2 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Eating Disorders Inventory 3 Drive for Thinness Subscale | The Eating Disorders Inventory 3 is a self report assessment that measures core eating disorder symptoms. Subjects will complete this measure at the beginning and end of the study and the investigator will measure the change in scores. The Drive for Thinness Subscale has a range of 0 to 28 where higher scores mean worse outcome. | Change from baseline to study completion, up to 2 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Guido Frank, MD | University of California, San Diego | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of California San Diego | San Diego | California | 92121 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32252538 | Background | Cole EJ, Stimpson KH, Bentzley BS, Gulser M, Cherian K, Tischler C, Nejad R, Pankow H, Choi E, Aaron H, Espil FM, Pannu J, Xiao X, Duvio D, Solvason HB, Hawkins J, Guerra A, Jo B, Raj KS, Phillips AL, Barmak F, Bishop JH, Coetzee JP, DeBattista C, Keller J, Schatzberg AF, Sudheimer KD, Williams NR. Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 1;177(8):716-726. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19070720. Epub 2020 Apr 7. | |
| 16957532 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000856 | Anorexia Nervosa |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001068 | Feeding and Eating Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to test the feasibility, safety and acceptability of a new form of TMS, intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), in anorexia nervosa and to test whether iTBS can reduce body image distortion and facilitate eating in anorexia nervosa.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| sham TMS using BrainsWay Model 104 system with H1-Coil | Device | 5 days of 10 daily sessions of sham iTBS treatment |
|
| Eating Disorders Inventory 3 (EDI-3) Body Dissatisfaction Subscale | The Eating Disorders Inventory 3 is a self report assessment that measures core eating disorder symptoms. Subjects will complete this measure at the beginning and end of the study and the investigator will measure the change in scores. The Drive for Thinness Subscale has a range of 0 to 40 where higher scores mean worse outcome. | Change from baseline to study completion, up to 2 weeks |
| Weight gain | Body Mass Index over time as a measure of food intake from the start to end of the study. | Change in body mass index from baseline to study completion, up to 2 weeks |
| Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Scale-Version Y (STAI-Y) State Anxiety Subscale | The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Scale-Version Y is a self report assessment that measure state and trait anxiety. Subjects will complete this measure at the beginning and end of the study and the investigator will measure the change in scores of State Anxiety. State anxiety has a range of 0 to 80 with higher scores indicating worse outcome. | Change from baseline to study completion, up to 2 weeks |
| Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Scale-Version Y (STAI-Y) Trait Anxiety Subscale | The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Scale-Version Y is a self report assessment that measure state and trait anxiety. Subjects will complete this measure at the beginning and end of the study and the investigator will measure the change in scores of Trait Anxiety. Trait anxiety has a range of 0 to 80 with higher scores indicating worse outcome. | Change from baseline to study completion, up to 2 weeks |
| Beck Depression Inventory | The Beck Depression Inventory is a self report assessment that measures depression. Subjects will complete this measure at the beginning and end of the study and the investigator will measure the change in scores. The score range is from 0 to 63 with higher scores indicating worse outcome. | Change from baseline to study completion, up to 2 weeks |
| Background |
| Schutter DJ, van Honk J. A standardized motor threshold estimation procedure for transcranial magnetic stimulation research. J ECT. 2006 Sep;22(3):176-8. doi: 10.1097/01.yct.0000235924.60364.27. |
| 26115776 | Background | Mir-Moghtadaei A, Caballero R, Fried P, Fox MD, Lee K, Giacobbe P, Daskalakis ZJ, Blumberger DM, Downar J. Concordance Between BeamF3 and MRI-neuronavigated Target Sites for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex. Brain Stimul. 2015 Sep-Oct;8(5):965-73. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 29. |
| 30980856 | Background | Frank GKW, DeGuzman MC, Shott ME. Motivation to eat and not to eat - The psycho-biological conflict in anorexia nervosa. Physiol Behav. 2019 Jul 1;206:185-190. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 10. |