Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-A02416-35 | Other Identifier | ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Every movement humans make in everyday life is based on a continuous integration of sensory information. A good interaction between sensory processes and motor control, called sensorimotor integration, is necessary for the efficiency of movements. Sensorimotor integration in the context of posture and walking is based on proprioception. Proprioception is the conscious and unconscious perception of the spatial and mechanical state of the musculoskeletal system. Proprioceptive information transmitted through the neuromuscular spindles in particular is suggested to play a role in motor rehabilitation.
This is particularly important when considering populations with impaired proprioception resulting in impaired posture and gait control. This is particularly the case for older adults and children with cerebral palsy (CP). Nevertheless, drastic differences exist between the two populations in the nature of these alterations: stable (children with CP) vs. progressive (older adults); brain lesion/upper motor neuron (children with CP) vs. processing deficits and peripheral sensory degradation (older adults); growing (children with CP) vs. fully developed individuals (older adults). However, both populations can improve their postural control with postural exercise programmes. In humans, the proprioceptive system can also be stimulated non-invasively by mechanical vibrations applied to tendons or muscles (localised vibration; LV), or by electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves (somatosensory electrical stimulation; SES). As a result, chronically applied SES can improve sensorimotor function in healthy adults and some clinical cohorts. Similarly, a 6-week weight-bearing and weight-shifting training programme combined with LV has been reported to provide improved benefits in postural control, again in stroke patients.The greater improvement in motor function when LV or SES is added to active muscles may reflect an adjuvant effect: the sensory signal from LV or SES stimulation is integrated with the sensory signals from the task being performed, thus acting as an associative conditioning of the proprioceptive system, and leading to improved sensorimotor integration. The present project aims to study the effectiveness of a short-term intervention combining postural exercises with LV, SES, or the combination of both.
In particular, this study will focus on the effects of these interventions on proprioception, postural control and walking in children with CP and older adults.Confirmation of hypotheses will open up new avenues for rehabilitation therapies and preventive interventions, and may be extended to other purposes and clinical populations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| POSTUR | Other | Postural training only. |
|
| POSTUR + LV (localized vibration) | Other | Postural training combined with localized vibration |
|
| POSTUR+SES (somatosensory electrical stimulation) | Other | Postural training combined with somatosensory electrical stimulation |
|
| POSTUR+LV-SES | Other | Postural training combined with somatosensory electrical stimulation and localized vibration |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POSTUR | Other | Training sessions without any stimulation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of body balance with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) | Variation of postural control | Change from Week 8 to Week 16 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of body balance with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) | Variation of postural control | Change from Week 1 to Week 22 |
| Evaluation of the displacement of the center of pressure with force platform in centimeter |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Older Adults:
Children with Cerebral Palsy:
Exclusion Criteria:
Older adults:
Pathology or surgery resulting in a locomotor disorder, within 6 months prior to the study,
Chronic neurological, motor or psychological pathologies
Use of neuro-active substances likely to alter cortico-spinal excitability (hypnotics, anti-epileptics, psychotropic drugs, muscle relaxants) during the study.
Contraindication to transcranial magnetic stimulation:
Participation at the same time in another interventional trial or having participated in a such a study within 30 days prior to this study.
Obesity (body mass index ≥ 30.0 kg/m²)
Children with cerebral palsy:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Leonard Feasson, PHD | CHU de Saint-Etienne | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Etienne | Saint-Etienne | 42055 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Localised Vibration | Other | Training sessions with localized vibration |
|
| Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation | Other | Training sessions with somatosensory electrical stimulation |
|
Variation of postural control
| Change from Week 1 to Week 22 |
| Displacement of the centrer of pressure with application of localized vibration in centimeter | Proprioceptive contribution to postural control | Change from Week 1 to Week 22 |
| Measure of the angular position error in degrees | Variation of the position direction | Change from Week 1 to Week 22 |
| Coefficient of variation muscle force control in percent | Muscle force control measurement | Change from Week 1 to Week 22 |
| Measure 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in meters | Walking ability evaluation | Change from Week 1 to Week 22 |
| Measure Timed Up & Go Test (TUG) in seconds | Walking ability evaluation | Change from Week 1 to Week 22 |
| Measure 10 meter walk test (10MWT) in seconds | Walking ability evaluation | Change from Week 1 to Week 22 |
| Quantifying corticospinal excitability with motor evoked potentials in milliVolt | Underlying neural adaptations evaluation in older adults only | Change from Week 1 to Week 22 |
| Quantifying spinal excitability with H-reflex in milliVolt | Underlying neural adaptations evaluation in older adults only | Change from Week 1 to Week 22 |