Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Zagazig University | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To evaluate the impact of the presence of cesarean section niche and its characteristics on the outcome of ART cycles.
The incidence of Cesarean section (CS) is increasing worldwide, with a corresponding increase in its associated complications. The well-known complications are infection, hemorrhage, and increased risk of obstetric complications in subsequent pregnancies, like morbidly adherent placenta, cs scar pregnancies and uterine rupture.
In addition, some studies emphasize the effect of cesarean sections on reduced fertility. A meta-analysis reported that a Caesarean section reduces the probability of subsequent pregnancy by 10%, compared with a previous vaginal delivery.
The cesarean section niche is defined as an indentation of the uterine myometrium of at least 2 mm at the site of the caesarean scar. The most common symptom of niche is abnormal uterine bleeding. Meanwhile, other symptoms include dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and sub-fertility/infertility.
The detection of a cesarean section niche depends on the operator and the diagnostic method used. This can be 2D, 3D transvaginal sonography, sonohysterography or hysteroscopy.
Regarding ART, the presence of cs niche was reported to reduce the chances of embryo implantation, and increase the rate of spontaneous miscarriages, especially if the implantation is close to it or in the niche.
The presence of a niche may increase the difficulty of embryo transfer procedure, clinicians need to be aware of its presence and the transfer should be done under ultrasound guidance to ensure the catheter bypasses the niche and enters the uterine cavity.
Still the impact of c.s niche and its characteristics on outcome of ART is not clear.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| cases with cs niche | 133 cases with cs niche undergoing ART will be included. Pituitary suppression will be achieved by long or antagonist protocol. For long protocol, GnRH agonist will be administered for 10-14 days starting from mid-luteal phase of preceding cycle. After confirmation of down regulation, gonadotropins will be given from second or third day of cycle in a daily dose of (150-300 IU). Gonadotropins therapy will be tailored according to age, BMI, antral follicle count, antimullerian hormone and previous response. In antagonist protocol, gonadotropins will be given from second or third day of cycle in a daily dose of (150-300 IU). GnRH antagonist will be adjusted according to patient response. On the 5th -6th day of stimulation, sonography will be performed and repeated every 1-3 days with regular estradiol assessment. When at least 3 follicles reach ≥ 17 mm in mean diameter, trigger will be given. Oocytes pick up will be performed 34-36 hour after triggering. |
| |
| cases without cs niche | 133 cases without cs niche undergoing ART will be included. Pituitary suppression will be achieved by long or antagonist protocol. For long protocol, GnRH agonist will be administered for 10-14 days starting from mid-luteal phase of preceding cycle. After confirmation of down regulation, gonadotropins will be given from second or third day of cycle in a daily dose of (150-300 IU). Gonadotropins therapy will be tailored according to age, BMI, antral follicle count, antimullerian hormone and previous response. In antagonist protocol, gonadotropins will be given from second or third day of cycle in a daily dose of (150-300 IU). GnRH antagonist will be adjusted according to patient response. On the 5th -6th day of stimulation, sonography will be performed and repeated every 1-3 days with regular estradiol assessment. When at least 3 follicles reach ≥ 17 mm in mean diameter, trigger will be given. Oocytes pick up will be performed 34-36 hour after triggering. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cs niche group | Diagnostic Test | A niche is formally defined by the European Niche Taskforce as an indentation of the uterine myometrium of at least 2 mm at the site of the CS scars. A niche can be sub classified as follows:
The following measurements will be taken:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The effect of cesarean scar niche and its characteristics on ongoing pregnancy rate of ART cycles. | Ongoing pregnancy: defined as a viable intrauterine pregnancy of at least 12 weeks duration confirmed on an ultrasound scan | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical pregnancy | Clinical pregnancy: A pregnancy diagnosed by ultrasonographic visualization of one or more gestational sacs. | 6 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
It will be carried out in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagazig University and in Rahem fertility center
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rana nabil, MSc | Contact | 01005899460 | rananabil51@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eman Elgindy, MD, PhD | Rahem Fertility Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rahem Fertility Center | Recruiting | Zagazig | 44511 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25516174 | Background | Schepker N, Garcia-Rocha GJ, von Versen-Hoynck F, Hillemanns P, Schippert C. Clinical diagnosis and therapy of uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1417-23. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3582-0. Epub 2014 Dec 17. | |
| 22114995 | Background | Clark EA, Silver RM. Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;205(6 Suppl):S2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.09.028. Epub 2011 Oct 6. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 28833750 | Background | D'Antonio F, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Monteagudo A, Buca D, Forlani F, Minneci G, Foti F, Manzoli L, Liberati M, Acharya G, Cali G. First-trimester detection of abnormally invasive placenta in high-risk women: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;51(2):176-183. doi: 10.1002/uog.18840. |
| 23644593 | Background | Gurol-Urganci I, Bou-Antoun S, Lim CP, Cromwell DA, Mahmood TA, Templeton A, van der Meulen JH. Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2013 Jul;28(7):1943-52. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det130. Epub 2013 May 3. |
| 29536581 | Background | Jordans IPM, de Leeuw RA, Stegwee SI, Amso NN, Barri-Soldevila PN, van den Bosch T, Bourne T, Brolmann HAM, Donnez O, Dueholm M, Hehenkamp WJK, Jastrow N, Jurkovic D, Mashiach R, Naji O, Streuli I, Timmerman D, van der Voet LF, Huirne JAF. Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;53(1):107-115. doi: 10.1002/uog.19049. |
| 30322585 | Background | Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, Gibbons D, Kelly NM, Kennedy HP, Kidanto H, Taylor P, Temmerman M. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5. |
| 30039641 | Background | Ludwin A, Martins WP, Ludwin I. Evaluation of uterine niche by three-dimensional sonohysterography and volumetric quantification: techniques and scoring classification system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;53(1):139-143. doi: 10.1002/uog.19181. No abstract available. |
| 23585560 | Background | Naji O, Wynants L, Smith A, Abdallah Y, Saso S, Stalder C, Van Huffel S, Ghaem-Maghami S, Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Bourne T. Does the presence of a Caesarean section scar affect implantation site and early pregnancy outcome in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit? Hum Reprod. 2013 Jun;28(6):1489-96. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det110. Epub 2013 Apr 12. |
| 31885047 | Background | Lawrenz B, Melado L, Garrido N, Coughlan C, Markova D, Fatemi H. Isthmocele and ovarian stimulation for IVF: considerations for a reproductive medicine specialist. Hum Reprod. 2020 Jan 1;35(1):89-99. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez241. |