A Pilot and Feasibility Study of a Dietary Intervention With Low-protein Meals in Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapies
A Pilot and Feasibility Study of a Dietary Intervention With Low-protein Meals in Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapies
The main idea of this study is that a low protein diet may alter the environment surrounding the tumor, enhancing the body's immune response leading to greater anticancer effects of treatment. This study intends to use a low-protein diet as a tool to enhance the immune response generated by immune check point inhibitor treatments.
This is a single center, randomized, open label study to assess the feasibility of a low-protein diet intervention in cancer patients who are receiving immunotherapies. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either immunotherapy plus control diet arm (~20% protein content) or immunotherapy plus intervention low-protein diet arm (10% protein content).
Inclusion Criteria:
Histologically documented solid tumor malignancies which is amenable for immunotherapy treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (i.e. PD1, PD-L1, CTLA inhibitors) as single agents or in combination.
Metastatic disease as evidenced by soft tissue and/or bony metastases on baseline bone scan and/or computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis
Life expectancy of at least 6 months
Adults ≥ 18 years of age
Adequate hematologic, renal, and liver function as evidenced by the following:
Exclusion Criteria:
• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 2 or higher
Treatment with any of the following medications or interventions within 28 days of registration:
A requirement for systemic immunosuppressive therapy for any reason
Any infection requiring parenteral antibiotic therapy or causing fever (temperature > 100.5°F or 38.1°C) within 1 week prior to registration
A known allergy, intolerance, or medical contraindication to receiving the contrast dye required for the protocol-specified CT imaging
Any medical intervention or other condition which, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, could compromise adherence with study requirements or otherwise compromise the study's objectives