Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| King's College Hospital NHS Trust | OTHER |
| King's College London | OTHER |
| Deontics Limited | UNKNOWN |
| Somerset NHS Foundation Trust |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Around 375,000 cancers are diagnosed in the UK annually, with this figure expected to reach 500,000 by 2035. As the number of different cancer treatment options and our scientific understanding continue to grow rapidly, it can be difficult for clinicians to keep up-to-date with best practice, causing unjustified variations in the quality of care and clinical outcomes for patients.
Currently, when a patient has been referred to and seen by a clinician, their treatment is then discussed in a Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting (MDTM). MDTM is a meeting of medical experts, including Surgeons, Oncologists, Nurses, and specialists in cancer, imaging and diagnosis. This is the case even if a treatment decision is straightforward.
A nationwide review published by CRUK in 2017 highlighted the demands on cancer teams and the MDTM process:
Deontics has a CE marked AI-based CDSS that integrates individual patient data and preferences with evidence-based clinical guidelines. This dynamically and transparently generates best-practice, individualised treatment recommendations which can help determine treatment. Deontics' AI tool has already been shown to provide personalised recommendations concordant with UK best practice while incorporating patient values, and can be used to safely triage less complex patients straight to treatment with minimal clinical oversight. Our project partners with Deontics to develop PROSAIC-DS - A CDSS for prostate cancer.
I
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Visible to MDTM | Other | Patients going through this arm have the decision support tool outcome visible to the MDTM |
|
| Arm B: Not-visible to MDTM | Other | Patients going through this arm will not have the decision support tool outcome visible to the MDTM |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical decision support tool recommended outcome | Other | The PROSAIC-DS tool will take the variables and produce a suggested outcome. It will supply supporting evidence and best practice for its recommendations |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PROSAIC-DS as a triage tool | The % of patients the PROSAIC-DS tool can appropriately triage away non-complex Prostate Cancer cases from the MDTM with appropriate treatment plans as directed by approved guidelines (EAU, BAUS, NICE, AUA). | 6-9 months |
| PROSAIC-DS influence on MDTM concordance with approved guidelines | Evaluation of PROSAIC-DS as a member of the MDTM via the impact of live PROSAIC-DS recommendations on MDTM decision concordance with approved guidelines (EAU, BAUS, NICE, AUA) on randomised patients discussed in the MDTM. This is measured through the difference in level of concordance between the MDTM with PROSAIC-DS switched off and the MDTM with PROSAIC-DS on when less complex cases (ones triaged away) are excluded. | 6-9 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cost effectiveness of PROSAIC-DS | Estimate the financial savings that PROSAIC-DS brings by triaging non-complex cases away from the MDTM. | 6-9 months - duration of data collection |
| Qualitative Analysis: Patient acceptability |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danny Ruta, MBBS MSc | Contact | +44 (0)7969917016 | Danny.Ruta@gstt.nhs.uk | |
| Kate Dodgson, LLB LLM | Contact | +447704783880 | kate.dodgson@deontics.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Danny Ruta, MBBS MSc | Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guys and St Thomas Hospitals | London | SE1 9RT | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30028418 | Background | Knight SR, Cao KN, South M, Hayward N, Hunter JP, Fox J. Development of a Clinical Decision Support System for Living Kidney Donor Assessment Based on National Guidelines. Transplantation. 2018 Oct;102(10):e447-e453. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002374. | |
| 22642614 | Background | Taylor C, Atkins L, Richardson A, Tarrant R, Ramirez AJ. Measuring the quality of MDT working: an observational approach. BMC Cancer. 2012 May 29;12:202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-202. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Meeting Patients Needs: Improving the effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Cancer Services. 2018 | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Feb 7, 2024 | |
| Reset | Jul 18, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2024 | Jul 18, 2024 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Prostate Cancer UK | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
We will use qualitative methods, and data capture methods including self-administered questionnaires, focus groups, semi-structured interviews and video analysis, to explore patient and staff views about, including concerns and satisfaction with, the use of AI technology to support clinical decisions in prostate cancer, both prior to their engagement with PROSAIC-DS, during and after deployment of the tool of the technology to patients.
| 12 months |
| Kings College Hospital | London | SE5 9RS | United Kingdom |
|
| 26365047 | Background | Munro AJ. Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Cancer Care: An Idea Whose Time has Gone? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2015 Dec;27(12):728-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Sep 11. No abstract available. |
| 22295234 | Background | Patkar V, Acosta D, Davidson T, Jones A, Fox J, Keshtgar M. Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: evidence, challenges, and the role of clinical decision support technology. Int J Breast Cancer. 2011;2011:831605. doi: 10.4061/2011/831605. Epub 2011 Jul 17. |
| 28341685 | Background | Miles A, Chronakis I, Fox J, Mayer A. Use of a computerised decision aid (DA) to inform the decision process on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer: development and preliminary evaluation. BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 24;7(3):e012935. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012935. |
| 22734113 | Background | Patkar V, Acosta D, Davidson T, Jones A, Fox J, Keshtgar M. Using computerised decision support to improve compliance of cancer multidisciplinary meetings with evidence-based guidance. BMJ Open. 2012 Jun 25;2(3):e000439. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000439. Print 2012. |
| 17117181 | Background | Patkar V, Hurt C, Steele R, Love S, Purushotham A, Williams M, Thomson R, Fox J. Evidence-based guidelines and decision support services: A discussion and evaluation in triple assessment of suspected breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006 Dec 4;95(11):1490-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603470. Epub 2006 Nov 21. |
| 24246343 | Background | Peleg M, Fox J, Patkar V, Glasspool D, Chronakis I, South M, Nassar S, Gaglia JL, Gharib H, Papini E, Paschke R, Duick DS, Valcavi R, Hegedus L, Garber JR. A Computer-Interpretable Version of the AACE, AME, ETA Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules. Endocr Pract. 2014 Apr;20(4):352-9. doi: 10.4158/EP13271.OR. |
| 15953000 | Background | Bury J, Hurt C, Roy A, Cheesman L, Bradburn M, Cross S, Fox J, Saha V. LISA: a web-based decision-support system for trial management of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2005 Jun;129(6):746-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05541.x. |
| 11807305 | Background | Tural C, Ruiz L, Holtzer C, Schapiro J, Viciana P, Gonzalez J, Domingo P, Boucher C, Rey-Joly C, Clotet B; Havana Study Group. Clinical utility of HIV-1 genotyping and expert advice: the Havana trial. AIDS. 2002 Jan 25;16(2):209-18. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200201250-00010. |
| 9345174 | Background | Walton RT, Gierl C, Yudkin P, Mistry H, Vessey MP, Fox J. Evaluation of computer support for prescribing (CAPSULE) using simulated cases. BMJ. 1997 Sep 27;315(7111):791-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7111.791. |
| 18806332 | Background | Patkar V, Fox J. Clinical guidelines and care pathways: a case study applying PROforma decision support technology to the breast cancer care pathway. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;139:233-42. |
| Transforming Multidisciplinary Team Meetings (MDTMs): Report by Prof Martin Gore (2017) for NHS England | View source |
| NHS England : Streamlining Multi-Disciplinary Team Meetings | View source |
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |