Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Avania | INDUSTRY |
| Canfield Scientific Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the superiority of STYLAGE® XXL versus no treatment at 24 weeks after baseline for the creation or restoration of volume deficit in the mid-face.
This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, no-treatment controlled post-market clinical follow-up of a class III medical device. This study is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of STYLAGE® XXL in the restorationor creation of volume in the mid-face.
The objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of STYLAGE® XXL versus no treatment at 24 weeks after baseline for the creation or restoration of volume deficit in the mid-face.
Assessment of superiority will be based on 3D analysis of the volumetric change, using a validated imaging system.
Effectiveness of STYLAGE® XXL will be demonstrated if the mean volumetric change at 24 weeks after baseline from pre-treatment in the treatment group is statistically superior to the mean change in the delayed treatment (control) group.
In total, approximately 90 subjects will be enrolled across three study centers in Switzerland, Austria, and France.
Subjects will be randomized to the treatment group or delayed treatment (control) group at a 5:1 ratio (i.e., there will be 5 more subjects treated with STYLAGE® XXL at baseline as compared to subjects who will be in the no-treatment (control) group and who will receive a delayed treatment with STYLAGE® XXL at 24 weeks after baseline).
The total duration of subject participation ranges from 18-19 months (treatment group) to 24-25 months (delayed treatment (control) group). Overall study duration including the enrolment period is expected to take approximately 30-31 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| STYLAGE® XXL Treatment Group | Experimental | Subjects randomized (5:1 ratio) to receive an initial treatment with STYLAGE® XXL Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Gel up to 8mL, based on the PI's assessment, in combination with the aesthetic goal of the subject, then an optional touch-up treatment session 4 weeks later, up to 4mL. Subjects will also be offered an optional retreatment at week 72 after initial treatment, up to 8mL. |
|
| No-Treatment Control Group, then Delayed Treatment with STYLAGE® XXL | Other | No-Treatment for the first 6-month, then subjects will receive a delayed treatment with STYLAGE® XXL Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Gel up to 8mL, based on the PI's assessment, in combination with the aesthetic goal of the subject, then an optional touch-up treatment session 4 weeks later, up to 4mL. Subjects will also be offered an optional retreatment at week 72 after initial treatment, up to 8mL. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STYLAGE® XXL | Device | Up to 2.0 mL will be injected in the zygomaticomalar region and optionally up to 2.0 mL in the anteromedial cheek at the first session, on each side of the face. Up to 1.0 mL in the zygomaticomalar region and optionally up to 1.0 mL in the anteromedial cheek for the optional touch-up session, on each side of the face. Up to 2.0 mL will be injected in the zygomaticomalar region and optionally up to 2.0 mL in the anteromedial cheek before study exit, on each side of the face. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-Face Volumetric change | Mean volumetric change between the treatment group and no-treatment control group at 24 (V4) weeks after baseline (V1) | 24 weeks after baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-Face Volumetric change | Mean volumetric change between the treatment group and no-treatment control group at 4 (V2) and 12 (V3) weeks after baseline (V1) | 4, and 12 weeks after baseline |
| Mid-Face Volumetric change |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
In terms of population:
In terms of associated pathology:
Relating to previous or ongoing treatment:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hervé RASPALDO, MD | Private Clinic, GENEVA, SWITZERLAND | Principal Investigator |
| Hugues CARTIER, MD | Centre Medical Saint-Jean, ARRAS, FRANCE | Principal Investigator |
| Thomas RAPPL, MD | Medical Aesthetic Research Academy, GRAZ, AUSTRIA | Principal Investigator |
| Cyril CLERICO, MD | Private Practice, NICE, FRANCE | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre Medical Saint Jean | Arras | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, No-Treatment Controlled Trial. Subjects will be randomized (5:1 ratio) to the STYLAGE® XXL (treatment) arm or the no-treatment control arm.
After 24 weeks, the no-treatment control arm (delayed treatment group) will receive their first treatment and will then follow the same schedule as the initial treatment group. After the no-treatment control group receives treatment, data from both groups will be pooled.
Not provided
Not provided
The primary endpoint is assessed through objective measures of facial volume, obtained using standardized, three-dimensional (3D), digital photographic images. Measurement will be made by an independent expert who will be blinded, as image files will not reveal subject treatment randomization, or the time point at which the image was taken.
|
| STYLAGE® XXL | Device | Up to 2.0 mL will be injected in the zygomaticomalar region and optionally up to 2.0 mL in the anteromedial cheek at the first session, on each side of the face. Up to 1.0 mL in the zygomaticomalar region and optionally up to 1.0 mL in the anteromedial cheek for the optional touch-up session, on each side of the face. Up to 2.0 mL will be injected in the zygomaticomalar region and optionally up to 2.0 mL in the anteromedial cheek before study exit, on each side of the face. |
|
Mean volumetric change between pre-treatment and directly after treatment at V1 (or V1b), and 4 (V2/V2b), 12 (V3/V3b), 48 (V5), and 72 (V6) weeks after initial treatment, in both groups pooled.
| 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 weeks after initial treatment |
| Global Aesthetic Improvement, by the Subjects | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS; improvement in the mid-face Area), assessed by the Subjects, between the treatment group and no-treatment control group. GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) is a 5-point scale rating global aesthetic improvement in appearance, compared to pretreatment, with higher scores mean better improvement, with 1 means "Worse" and 5 means "Very much improved". | 4, 12, and 24 weeks after baseline |
| Global Aesthetic Improvement, by the Subjects | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS; improvement in the mid-face Area), assessed by the Subjects, in both groups pooled. GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) is a 5-point scale rating global aesthetic improvement in appearance, compared to pretreatment, with higher scores mean better improvement, with 1 means "Worse" and 5 means "Very much improved". | 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 weeks after initial treatment |
| Global Aesthetic Improvement, by the Investigators | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS; improvement in the mid-face Area), assessed by the Investigators, between the treatment group and no-treatment control group. GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) is a 5-point scale rating global aesthetic improvement in appearance, compared to pretreatment, with higher scores mean better improvement, with 1 means "Worse" and 5 means "Very much improved". | 4, 12, and 24 weeks after baseline |
| Global Aesthetic Improvement, by the Investigators | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS; improvement in the mid-face Area), assessed by the Investigators, in both groups pooled. GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) is a 5-point scale rating global aesthetic improvement in appearance, compared to pretreatment, with higher scores mean better improvement, with 1 means "Worse" and 5 means "Very much improved". | 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 weeks after initial treatment |
| FACE-Q, by the Subjects | Rash-transformed score of the FACE-Q, assessed by the Subjects, between the treatment group and no-treatment control group. FACE-Q is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure that can be used to measure outcomes of aesthetic facial procedures and products from the patient's perspective, composed of a set of independently functioning scales/checklists. In this study; two scales are assessed:
The total score is converted to a score from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflect a better outcome. | Baseline, and 4, 12, and 24 weeks after baseline |
| FACE-Q, by the Subjects | Rash-transformed score of the FACE-Q, assessed by the Subjects, in both groups pooled. FACE-Q is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure that can be used to measure outcomes of aesthetic facial procedures and products from the patient's perspective, composed of a set of independently functioning scales/checklists. In this study; two scales are assessed:
The total score is converted to a score from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflect a better outcome. | Initial treatment, and 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 weeks after initial treatment |
| Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), by the Investigators. | Nasolabial Fold Severity using the wrinkle severity rating scale (WSRS), assessed by the Investigators, between the treatment group and no-treatment control group. The WSRS (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) is a 5-point rating scale to determine the severity of the nasolabial folds (NLF), with lower scores mean better condition (less severity), with 1 means "Absent - No visible NLF, continuous skin line" and 5 means "Extreme - Extremely deep and long nasolabial fold, detrimental to facial appearance; 2-4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched". | 4, 12, and 24 weeks after baseline |
| Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), by the Investigators. | Nasolabial Fold Severity using the wrinkle severity rating scale (WSRS), assessed by the Investigators, in both groups pooled. The WSRS (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) is a 5-point rating scale to determine the severity of the nasolabial folds (NLF), with lower scores mean better condition (less severity), with 1 means "Absent - No visible NLF, continuous skin line" and 5 means "Extreme - Extremely deep and long nasolabial fold, detrimental to facial appearance; 2-4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched". | 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 weeks after initial treatment |
| Ease of sculpting and massaging, by the Investigators | Ease of sculpting and massaging of the HA gel, assessed by the investigator after each treatment session, on a 5-point scale ranging from "Very easy" to "Very difficult", in both groups pooled. | Initial treatment, and 4, and 72 weeks after initial treatment |