STOPS Trial: A Multicentre Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Total Colectomy With Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus Subtotal Colectomy With Cecal-rectal Anastomosis for Slow Transit Constipation
STOPS Trial: A Multicentre Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Total Colectomy With Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus Subtotal Colectomy With Cecal-rectal Anastomosis for Slow Transit Constipation
Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is a traditional surgical option for slow transit constipation (STC). Subtotal colectomy with caecorectal anastomosis have been reported to be a potential alternative approach. Thus, the optimal surgical option for STC is controversial.
Constipation, a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder, affects 10%-15% of adults in the United States and approximately 8.2% of China's general population. Slow transit constipation (STC), accounting for 15%-42% of constipation cases, is characterized by impaired colonic motility. For patients refractory to conservative therapies who experience chronic, intractable symptoms and diminished quality of life (QoL), surgical intervention becomes the last-resort treatment. The primary surgical approach for STC has historically been total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA). Over the past two decades, however, subtotal colectomy with cecorectal anastomosis (SC-CRA) has garnered growing interest within the surgical community due to its potential to mitigate postoperative diarrhea. Despite this benefit, SC-CRA raises concerns about an elevated risk of recurrent constipation. The debate regarding the superiority of these approaches remains unresolved. This study aims to address this controversy through a comparative analysis of TC-IRA and SC-CRA, evaluating their therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles in refractory STC.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Yuzhong, Chongqing Municipality 400042, China
Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China
Shengyang, Liaoning 110001, China