Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Parker University | OTHER |
| Karolinska Institutet | OTHER |
| McMaster University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Previous studies showed that some back pain patients (with specific characteristics) present less days with pain when treated with chiropractic maintenance care. A clinical instrument (called MAINTAIN instrument) was developed to identify those patients who would benefit from chiropractic maintenance care. This study will investigate the impact of using the MAINTAIN instrument in clinical practice. This study will help to improve clinical care of patients with back and neck pain by providing them with more individualized care.
Rationale: Non-specific Low Back Pain (LBP) is one of the largest societal economic burdens with a 80-85% lifetime prevalence worldwide, often characterized by recurrent episodes. Chiropractic maintenance care (MC) is a management strategy aimed at preventing LBP episodes and deterioration by treating patients at pre-planned intervals, regardless of symptoms. It consists of manual therapy, individual exercises and lifestyle advice, and patients are selected based on their previous history of pain and the effectiveness of the initial care plan. A pragmatic randomized clinical trial showed that patients receiving MC had 12.8 fewer days with bothersome LBP compared to a control group. More specifically, patients in the Dysfunctional sub-group, categorized by the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) instrument, reported fewer days with pain when receiving MC, suggesting MC's superior effectiveness in this subgroup of patients. The MPI instrument, however, is not suited for daily clinical practice use, prompting the development of the more practical MAINTAIN instrument. It captures 5 dimensions of the pain experience yielding 3 categories of patients: not a candidate for MC, good candidate for MC (sensitivity: 95.8%; specificity: 64.3%) and very good candidate for MC (sensitivity: 81.1%; specificity: 79.2%). Despite these encouraging preliminary results, the usability and impact of using the MAINTAIN instrument in clinical practice remains unknown and a thorough investigation on its implementation is fundamental.
Purpose: The overall goal of this multicenter randomized clinical trial is to investigate the process and outcomes of implementing the MAINTAIN instrument in clinical practice. The specific aims are to: 1) assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stratified MC using the MAINTAIN instrument compared to standard chiropractic care; and 2) assess the fidelity and procedure compliance of implementing the MAINTAIN instrument.
Analysis Plan: An intention to treat protocol will be used and estimates will be reported with arithmetic means and 95% confidence intervals. Analysis of the primary outcome (number of days with activity limiting pain) will be conducted as it was in Eklund et al. (2018, 2019). The total number of days with activity limiting pain will be modelled using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) linear regression, using appropriate correlation structure and robust variance estimator. Terms for study arm, time and study arm by time interaction will be included. A term for MC candidate (Yes or No) will be added to this model to further investigate the stratification and its relationship to outcomes. The RE-AIM framework will be used to assess the impact and implementation of the MAINTAIN instrument.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stratified Maintenance Care | Experimental | All participating patients will receive pragmatic chiropractic care for the initial 3 weeks (6 visits) and home exercise recommendations. Participants in the Stratified Maintenance Care group will be classified based on the MAINTAIN instrument into: not a candidate, good candidate, and very good candidate for maintenance care:
|
|
| Standard Chiropractic Care | Active Comparator | All participating patients will receive pragmatic chiropractic care for the initial 3 weeks (6 visits) and home exercise recommendations. In the Standard chiropractic care group, participating patients will receive a standard (pragmatic) chiropractic care in which treatment will be provided based on the clinician's judgement and home exercise recommendations. This may or may not include maintenance care depending on the clinicians' standard operating procedures. All treatments provided will be recorded. Return for further treatment will be recommended if they have a relapse or exacerbation of symptoms (symptom-based). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chiropractic maintenance care | Other | Manual Therapy, individual exercises and lifestyle advice |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of days with activity-limiting pain | Number of days with activity-limiting pain | 12-months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of missed working days | Number of missed working days due to pain | 12-months |
| Loss of work productivity | 11-point numeric rating scale, where 0 = did not affect my work and 10 = completely prevented me from working |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martha Funabashi, PhD | Contact | 647 805 2024 | mfunabashi@cmcc.ca |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College | Recruiting | Toronto | Ontario | M2H 3 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41664083 | Derived | Funabashi M, Ives G, Pohlman KA, Hogg-Johnson S, Townsend M, Macedo L, Lee J, Eklund A. C-prior-implementation of the MAINTAIN instrument for patients with spinal pain: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2026 Feb 10;27(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09509-6. |
Not provided
Not provided
This study will be part of an international project where multiple coordinated trials will collect data on different aspects of maintenance care. While this specific project is independent and focuses on Canadian population, a core set of outcomes collected in each study will be merged with data from the other trials internationally for secondary analyses.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| D019547 | Neck Pain |
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard chiropractic care | Other | Standard care based on clinician's judgement |
|
| 12-months |
| Pain intensity | 11-point visual analogue scale, where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst imaginable pain | 12-months |