Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-arm, Phase 3 study to compare the efficacy, PK (Pharmacokinetic), PD (Pharmacodynamic), safety, and immunogenicity of Bmab 1000 and Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
The study will consist of 3 study periods: Screening period; Part 1, double-blind active-controlled period; and Part 2, transition period. In the double-blind active-controlled period, eligible Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1000 or Prolia®. Prior to dosing At Week 52, patients in Prolia® treatment group will be randomized again in a 1:1 ratio to either continue on Prolia® or be transitioned to Bmab 1000. To maintain the study blinding, the patients in the original Bmab 1000 arm will also go through the re-randomization procedure; however, they will continue to receive Bmab 1000. The interventions (Bmab 1000 or Prolia®) will be administered subcutaneously every 6 months. End-of-study visit will be at Week 78 post randomization (Month 18).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bmab 1000 | Experimental |
| |
| Prolia®: | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bmab 1000 | Biological | 60 mg administered as a single SC (subcutaneous) injection once every 6 months. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage Change in Lumbar Spine BMD (Bone Mineral Density) | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 52 in lumbar spine BMD | Baseline and Week 52 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| AUEC (Area Under the Effect Curve) of the Bone Resorption Marker sCTX (Serum C-terminal Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen) | To demonstrate pharmacodynamic equivalence between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on AUEC of the bone resorption marker sCTX from baseline to week 26 | Baseline to Week 26 |
| Percentage Change in Lumbar Spine BMD |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with T-score of <-4.0 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck.
Known history of previous exposure to denosumab (Prolia®, Xgeva®, or any biosimilar denosumab).
For prior or ongoing use of any osteoporosis treatment (other than calcium and vitamin D supplements) following points to be considered for the washout periods prior to the screening visit:
a. Oral bisphosphonate i. Ineligible if used for 3 or more years cumulatively ii. If used for <3 years, a gap of at least 1 year since the last dose is required at the screening visit b. Dose received any time
Systemic glucocorticosteroids
Patients with ongoing serious infections
Evidence of any of the following per the patient's history, DXA, or X-ray review and/or current disease:
Postmenopausal women
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPD Global Ltd, Granta Park, Great Abington, | Cambridge | UK | CB21 6GQ | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42110973 | Derived | Eastell R, Orwoll E, Cosman F, Plebanski R, Kumar K, Marwah A, Deodhar SS, Wolff-Holz E, Loganathan S. Efficacy, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of Bmab 1000 vs reference denosumab: 78-wk results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-arm Phase 3 trial (DEVOTE) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. JBMR Plus. 2026 Apr 11;10(6):ziag062. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziag062. eCollection 2026 Jun. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study was conducted at 42 sites across 4 countries, and enrolled 479 subjects
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Part 1: Bmab 1000; Part 2: Bmab 1000-Bmab 1000 | Part 1: Patients were randomly assigned at the baseline/randomization visit (Week 0/Day 1) to receive either Bmab 1000 or Prolia using a 1:1 allocation ratio. Part 2: All patients who completed Part 1 underwent the re-randomization process prior to the study drug administration at Week 52. Patients in the Prolia arm were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1000 or Prolia, to obtain data after a single switch in patients who had been treated with Prolia. To maintain the study blinding, the patients in the original Bmab 1000 arm also underwent the re-randomization procedure; however, they continued to receive Bmab 1000 treatment in Part 2 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 31, 2022 | Jul 14, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Double-blind (Patient, Investigator)
| Prolia® | Biological | 60 mg administered as a single SC injection once every 6 months |
|
To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 26 in lumbar spine BMD |
| Baseline and Week 26 |
| Percentage Change in Total Hip BMD by DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry) | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline, at Week 26 and Week 52 in lumbar spine BMD | Baseline upto week 26 |
| Serum Concentrations of P1NP (Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide) | To compare bone turnover between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on P1NP after the first dose | Baseline up to Week 52 |
| Incidence of TEAEs (Treatment-emergent Adverse Events) up to 6 Months After the Second Dose | To compare safety and tolerability of 2 administrations of Bmab 1000 and Prolia® 6 months apart | Baseline up to Week 78 |
| Incidence of ADA (Anti-drug Antibody) | To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® | Week 78 (Transition Period) |
| Incidence of ADA (Anti-drug Antibody) | To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® | Baseline up to Week 52 (Double-blind Active-controlled Period) |
| Incidence of NAb (Neutralizing Antibody) up to Week 52 | To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® | Baseline up to Week 52 (Double-blind Active-controlled Period) |
| Percentage Change in Total Hip BMD by DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry) | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline, at Week 26 and Week 52 in lumbar spine BMD | Week 52 |
| Incidence of NAb (Neutralizing Antibody) up to Week 52 | To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® | Week 78 (Transition Period) |
| Percentage Change From Baseline in Hip BMD | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 78 in Hip BMD | Week 78 |
| Percentage Change From Baseline in Femoral BMD | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 78 in Femoral BMD | Week 78 |
| Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of sCTX | To compare minimum Concentration (Cmin) of sCTX between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® | baseline to Week 26 |
| Denosumab Concentrations at Weeks 26 | Serum Concentrations of Denosumab | Weeks 26 |
| Denosumab Concentrations at Weeks 52 | Serum Concentrations of Denosumab | Weeks 52 |
| Denosumab Concentrations at Weeks 78 | Serum Concentrations of Denosumab | Weeks 78 |
| Percentage Change From Baseline in Femoral BMD | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 52 in Femoral BMD | Week 52 |
| FG001 | Part 1: Prolia®; Part 2: Prolia®-Bmab 1000 | Part 1: Patients were randomly assigned at the baseline/randomization visit (Week 0/Day 1) to receive either Bmab 1000 or Prolia using a 1:1 allocation ratio. Part 2: All patients who completed Part 1 underwent the re-randomization process prior to the study drug administration at Week 52. Patients in the Prolia arm were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1000 or Prolia, to obtain data after a single switch in patients who had been treated with Prolia. To maintain the study blinding, the patients in the original Bmab 1000 arm also underwent the re-randomization procedure; however, they continued to receive Bmab 1000 treatment in Part 2 |
| FG002 | Part 1: Not Applicable; Part 2: Prolia®-Prolia® | Part 1: Patients were randomly assigned at the baseline/randomization visit (Week 0/Day 1) to receive either Bmab 1000 or Prolia using a 1:1 allocation ratio. Part 2: All patients who completed Part 1 underwent the re-randomization process prior to the study drug administration at Week 52. Patients in the Prolia arm were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Bmab 1000 or Prolia, to obtain data after a single switch in patients who had been treated with Prolia. To maintain the study blinding, the patients in the original Bmab 1000 arm also underwent the re-randomization procedure; however, they continued to receive Bmab 1000 treatment in Part 2 |
|
| COMPLETED | (Week 52) |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| Part 2 |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Bmab 1000 | Bmab 1000: 60 mg administered as a single subcutaneous (SC) injection once every 6 months. |
| BG001 | Prolia®: | Prolia®: 60 mg administered as a single SC injection once every 6 months |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage Change in Lumbar Spine BMD (Bone Mineral Density) | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 52 in lumbar spine BMD | Full analysis set | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent change | Baseline and Week 52 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | AUEC (Area Under the Effect Curve) of the Bone Resorption Marker sCTX (Serum C-terminal Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen) | To demonstrate pharmacodynamic equivalence between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on AUEC of the bone resorption marker sCTX from baseline to week 26 | Modified Full Analysis Set | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | day*pg/mL | Baseline to Week 26 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage Change in Lumbar Spine BMD | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 26 in lumbar spine BMD | Full Analysis Set | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent change | Baseline and Week 26 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage Change in Total Hip BMD by DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry) | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline, at Week 26 and Week 52 in lumbar spine BMD | Full Analysis Set | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent change | Baseline upto week 26 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Serum Concentrations of P1NP (Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide) | To compare bone turnover between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on P1NP after the first dose | Modified Full Analysis Set | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ng/ml | Baseline up to Week 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Incidence of TEAEs (Treatment-emergent Adverse Events) up to 6 Months After the Second Dose | To compare safety and tolerability of 2 administrations of Bmab 1000 and Prolia® 6 months apart | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline up to Week 78 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Incidence of ADA (Anti-drug Antibody) | To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® | Safety Analysis Set for Transition Period | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 78 (Transition Period) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Incidence of ADA (Anti-drug Antibody) | To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® | Safety Analysis Set | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline up to Week 52 (Double-blind Active-controlled Period) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Incidence of NAb (Neutralizing Antibody) up to Week 52 | To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline up to Week 52 (Double-blind Active-controlled Period) |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage Change in Total Hip BMD by DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry) | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline, at Week 26 and Week 52 in lumbar spine BMD | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent change | Week 52 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Incidence of NAb (Neutralizing Antibody) up to Week 52 | To compare immunogenicity between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® | Safety Analysis Set for Transition Period | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 78 (Transition Period) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage Change From Baseline in Hip BMD | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 78 in Hip BMD | Full Analysis Set for Transition Period | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change | Week 78 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage Change From Baseline in Femoral BMD | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 78 in Femoral BMD | Full Analysis Set for Transition Period | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change | Week 78 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of sCTX | To compare minimum Concentration (Cmin) of sCTX between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® | Modified Full Analysis Set | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | pg/mL | baseline to Week 26 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Denosumab Concentrations at Weeks 26 | Serum Concentrations of Denosumab | Modified Full Analysis Set | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ng/mL | Weeks 26 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Denosumab Concentrations at Weeks 52 | Serum Concentrations of Denosumab | Modified Full Analysis Set | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ng/mL | Weeks 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Denosumab Concentrations at Weeks 78 | Serum Concentrations of Denosumab | Modified Full Analysis Set | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ng/mL | Weeks 78 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage Change From Baseline in Femoral BMD | To demonstrate equivalent efficacy between Bmab 1000 and Prolia® based on percentage change from baseline at Week 52 in Femoral BMD | Full Analysis Set | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent change | Week 52 |
|
|
0- 78 weeks
All Deaths, Serious Adverse Events, and Other Adverse Events were described. For Other adverse Events, a threshold of 2% was used.
Only one Death was reported during part 1 of the study. Total no. of patients at risk for all-cause mortality is different as compared to the participant at risk for SAEs and other AEs reported throughout the study. Throughout the study is defined as all patients who received Bmab1000 throughout the study or Prolia throughout the study i.e. up to week 78.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Bmab 1000 | Bmab 1000: 60 mg administered as a single SC (subcutaneous) injection once every 6 months. | 0 | 342 | 15 | 218 | 144 | 218 |
| EG001 | Prolia®: | Prolia®: 60 mg administered as a single SC injection once every 6 months | 1 | 240 | 2 | 104 | 72 | 104 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastric ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inflammatory bowel disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urosepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vestibular neuronitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal disorder | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Invasive lobular breast carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Endometrial hyperplasia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ovarian cyst | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear inflammation | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Noninfective mastoiditis | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cataract | Eye disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arterial injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ureterolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Allergic sinusitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cystitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Laryngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypercholesterolaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood parathyroid hormone increased | Investigations | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site erythema | General disorders | MedDRA, Version 27.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
On Protocol signature page, investigator (PI) declares by signing that "I will not disclose information regarding this clinical investigation or publish results of the investigation without authorization from Biocon Biologics UK Limited."
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarika S Deodhar | Biocon Biologics Limited | 0802808 | 5301 | Sarika.Deodhar@biocon.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 24, 2024 | Jul 14, 2025 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069448 | Denosumab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Japanese |
|
| Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|