Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Fondation Apicil | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main objective is to compare the effectiveness of LocoRegional Anesthesia (LRA) (bilateral transverse thoracic block or bilateral parasternal block) in addition to standard management compared to standard management alone (general anesthesia without LRA) on the FQoR-15 (French Quality of Recovery - 15 score) at H+24 after cardiac surgery by sternotomy.This is a phase III monocentric superiority study , comparative, with three parallel groups, randomized with a ratio (1:1:1), controlled versus standard management, single-blind.
Each year, more than one million patients worldwide undergo cardiac surgery via sternotomy. Postoperative pain is frequent in this context, affecting 49% of patients at rest and 78% during mobilization. This pain is associated with many avoidable post-operative complications.
Nowadays, ERAS (Enhanced Rehabilitation After Surgery) protocols are increasingly developed in order to optimize post-operative rehabilitation. The management of postoperative pain is one of their main challenges and is based in particular on the use of locoregional anesthesia (LRA) with the aim of sparing morphine.
Several LRAs have been described in cardiac surgery in recent years, and they are increasingly used in routine clinical practice. Transverse thoracic block and parasternal block are the main peripheral LRA techniques proposed for surgical procedures with sternotomy. Transverse chest block was first described in cardiac surgery in 2015 ; and the parasternal block in 2018. These techniques are spreading in current clinical practice because of their simplicity of implementation, their safety and their supposed effectiveness. The parasternal block is more recent, and presents a more superficial injection plane than the transverse thoracic block. Thus, it is theoretically as effective as the transverse thoracic and less at risk of complications.
The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of LRA (bilateral transverse thoracic block or bilateral parasternal block) in addition to standard management compared to standard management alone (general anesthesia without LRA) on the quality of early postoperative recovery after heart surgery by sternotomy.
The primary endpoint is the postoperative recovery score in the French version, FQoR-15 (French Quality of Recovery - 15 score), performed at H+24. The FQoR-15 is currently one of the most reliable and reproducible tools for assessing the quality of postoperative rehabilitation. This instrument is one of the recommended endpoints for the evaluation of patient comfort, according to a recent consensus of international experts.
This study is a phase III study of superiority, monocentric, comparative, with three parallel groups, randomized with a ratio (1:1:1), controlled versus standard care, single-blind. of inclusion is 254 patients included and randomized.
The patient is pre-included during the pre-anaesthetic visit, the day before his scheduled surgery. He receives oral and written information, and provides his written consent to participate in this study, the follow-up will be 30 days. Depending on the randomization, the patient receives one of the following three treatments:
If the hypotheses on the effectiveness of parasternal block and/or transverse thoracic block are confirmed, postoperative recovery in the interventional arms will be improved. This will confirm the value of performing an LRA postoperatively.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTP group (= Transversus Thoracic Plane block = Deep PIP = Deep parasternal intercostal plane block) | Experimental | At the end of the surgery, realisation of a bilateral transverse thoracic block. (20ml of Naropeine 0.2%, each side) Followed by standard analgesic treatment. |
|
| PSB group (=ParaSternal Block = Superficial PIP = Superficial parasternal intercostal plane block) | Experimental | At the end of the surgery, realisation of a bilateral parasternal block (20ml of Naropeine 0.2%, each side). Followed by standard analgesic treatment. |
|
| Control group | Sham Comparator | Standard analgesic treatment alone (without LRA) . |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRA Loco-regional anesthesia | Drug | Bilateral parasternal block or transverse thoracic block are performed ultrasound-guided, at the end of surgery in the operating room. Once in the desired plane depending on the randomisation (transverse or parasternal), a volume of 20 ml of ropivacaine at 2 mg/ml is injected on each side of the sternum. The intervention (TTP or PSB) is performed by the anesthetist-resuscitator investigator. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| FQoR-15 score at 24 hours (French Quality of Recovery-15 score) | Value of the French Quality of Recovery-15 score (minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 150, with a higher score for a better outcome). The QoR-15 questionnaires will be completed by the patient himself whenever possible, who could be helped by a nurse blinded to the assignment group. | 24 hours after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain (VRS) at rest and mobilisation | Analgesic efficacy at rest and during exercise (cough, physiotherapy session, mobilization) assessed via pain measurements by a simple verbal rating scale (VRS) with 11 items (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) | 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 , 72 hours after surgery and during the removal of surgical drains |
Not provided
Pre-inclusion criteria :
Criteria for confirming inclusion
Non-inclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeanneteau | Angers | maine et loire | 49933 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29027773 | Background | Bignami E, Castella A, Pota V, Saglietti F, Scognamiglio A, Trumello C, Pace MC, Allegri M. Perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Apr;84(4):488-503. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12142-5. Epub 2017 Oct 12. | |
| 17006079 | Background | Lahtinen P, Kokki H, Hynynen M. Pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective cohort study of 1-year incidence and intensity. Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct;105(4):794-800. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200610000-00026. |
Not provided
Not provided
The data will be collected in a coded manner: 1st letter of the surname, 1st letter of the patient's first name, serial number of inclusion in the center by the physicians investigating the study in the electronic observation notebook of the study ( EnnovClinical) managed by the DRCI of the CHU of Angers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010149 | Pain, Postoperative |
| D001733 | Bites and Stings |
| D000377 | Agnosia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010146 | Pain |
Not provided
Not provided
Study phase III, superiority study, monocentric, comparative, with three parallel groups, randomized with a ratio (1:1:1), controlled versus standard care, single-blind
Not provided
Not provided
Randomization takes place during surgery. Bilateral parasternal block or transverse thoracic block are performed ultrasound-guided, under general anesthesia.
|
|
| Standardized post-operative analgesia protocol | Procedure | The pain management protocol in intensive care is as follows:
The PCA is usually maintained until 24-48h after the intervention then relayed by oxycodone 5mg every 4h if EVA > 3 sublingual and addition of oxycodone LP 10mg x 2 per day if daily intake on PCA > 20mg. Remedy molecules in case of ineffective analgesia: ketoprofen 100mg q12h IV, or 50mg q8h PO; nefopam 20mg every 6h IV or PO; ketamine 1 to 1.5 mg/kg/24H IVSE. |
|
| Post-operative consumption of morphine (milligrams) |
Amount of opioid consumption, in equivalent of milligrams. |
| 3, 6, 12 hours after surgery and daily assessed at 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours after surgery |
| Post-operative consumption of daily non-morphine analgesics (milligrams) | Including Pacetamol, Nefopam, ketoprofene, Ketamine in milligrams. | 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours after surgery |
| Rate of painful patients | Proportion of patients having had at least one VRS >3 | 24 and 48 hours after surgery |
| FQoR-15 score at 48 hours | The quality of postoperative recovery reassessed 48 hours after surgery by the FQoR-15; Value of the French Quality of Recovery-15 score (minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 150, with a higher score for a better outcome). The QoR-15 questionnaires will be completed by the patient himself whenever possible, who could be helped by a nurse blinded to the assignment group. | 48 hours after surgery |
| Rate of patients with at least one complication of LRA | Proportion of patients with at least one complication of LRA: systemic intoxication with local anesthetics within 3 hours after injection, hematoma or infection at the puncture site. | 30 days |
| Rate of postoperative complications | The proportion of patients with at least one major postoperative complication of cardiac surgery during hospitalization: de novo postoperative atrial fibrillation, revision surgery, respiratory failure, mediastinitis, neurological complication, acute renal failure, gastrointestinal complication, infectious complication with bacteremia, pneumothorax, infectious pneumonitis. | 30 days |
| Rate of patients return to preoperative weight | Proportion of patient return to announced weight at the pre-anaesthetic consultation (truncating the weight in kg) | Noted at day 3 and 5 after surgery |
| Rate of patients return to a transit | Proportion of patient return to a transit (including solid or gaseous transit) | Noted at day 3 and 5 after surgery |
| Extubation time (hours) | Measured in number of hours since arrival in intensive care (between arrival in intensive care and the first attempt at extubation); | Noted at Day 30 |
| Duration of hospitalization. (days) | The length of stay in post-operative intensive care (between arrival in intensive care and leaving the service) and in the hospital counted in number of days started. | Noted at Day 30 |
| Rate of readmission to intensive care. | The proportion of patients admitted in the intensive care unit whatever the reason, censored at 30 days. | Noted at Day 30 |
| 27343790 | Background | Huang AP, Sakata RK. Pain after sternotomy - review. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016 Jul-Aug;66(4):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.09.013. Epub 2016 Apr 23. |
| 26658201 | Background | McIsaac DI, Cole ET, McCartney CJ. Impact of including regional anaesthesia in enhanced recovery protocols: a scoping review. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115 Suppl 2:ii46-56. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev376. |
| 26897453 | Background | Ueshima H, Hara E, Marui T, Otake H. RETRACTED: The ultrasound-guided transversus thoracic muscle plane block is effective for the median sternotomy. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Mar;29:83. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.10.014. Epub 2016 Feb 9. No abstract available. |
| 24396082 | Background | de la Torre PA, Garcia PD, Alvarez SL, Miguel FJ, Perez MF. A novel ultrasound-guided block: a promising alternative for breast analgesia. Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Jan 1;34(1):198-200. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13515902. No abstract available. |
| 32654751 | Background | Leger M, Campfort M, Cayla C, Parot-Schinkel E, Lasocki S, Rineau E. Validation of an alternative French version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score: the FQoR-15. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):e345-e347. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.052. Epub 2020 Jul 9. No abstract available. |
| 29397134 | Background | Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gogenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22. |
| 29576111 | Background | Myles PS, Boney O, Botti M, Cyna AM, Gan TJ, Jensen MP, Kehlet H, Kurz A, De Oliveira GS Jr, Peyton P, Sessler DI, Tramer MR, Wu CL; StEP-COMPAC Group; Myles P, Grocott M, Biccard B, Blazeby J, Boney O, Chan M, Diouf E, Fleisher L, Kalkman C, Kurz A, Moonesinghe R, Wijeysundera D. Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: patient comfort. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Apr;120(4):705-711. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Feb 2. |
| 40640047 | Derived | Demarquette A, Jeanneteau A, Blanchard-Daguet A, Fouquet O, Parot-Schinkel E, Lasocki S, Rineau E, Leger M. Impact of superficial and deep parasternal blocks on recovery after cardiac surgery with sternotomy: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2025 Sep;135(3):764-771. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.043. Epub 2025 Jul 9. |
| 37415221 | Derived | Jeanneteau A, Demarquette A, Blanchard-Daguet A, Fouquet O, Lasocki S, Riou J, Rineau E, Leger M. Effect of superficial and deep parasternal blocks on recovery after cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Jul 6;24(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07446-2. |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D011041 | Poisoning |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D010468 | Perceptual Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |