Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to collect clinical data to evaluate the safety and performance of ESTYME® MATRIX Round microtextured breast implants in patients who receive these silicone gel-filled implants as part of their breast augmentation surgery in primary intention. This study also aims to measure patient and surgeon satisfaction.
An initial study of all ESTYME® MATRIX implants was conducted between 2018 and 2021. The purpose of the current EMMA study is to complete the data from this first study on a larger number of implants, and only on the ESTYME® MATRIX Round Microtextured Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants range for primary intention breast augmentation, with a view to obtaining marketing authorization (CE marking).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESTYME® MATRIX Round Microtextured Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants | Experimental | Participants who meet the requirements for bilateral breast augmentation in primary intention and have been implanted with ESTYME® MATRIX Round Microtextured Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESTYME® MATRIX Round Microtextured Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants | Device | Bilateral brest augmentation in primary intention |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety : Incidence of implant and/or procedure-related adverse events/complications | Safety endpoint will be assessed by the incidence of implant and/or procedure-related adverse events/complications at 3 months post implant | 3 months post-procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety : Incidence of all AEs/SAEs | Safety endpoint will be assessed by the incidence of all AEs/SAEs at 1 year post-procedure | 1 year post-procedure |
| Safety : Incidence of all AEs/SAEs | Safety endpoint will be assessed by the incidence of all AEs/SAEs at 2 years post-procedure |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Aged between 18 and 65 years
Eligible for bilateral breast augmentation in primary intention
Signature of Patient Information Consent (PIC) & willingness to comply with the protocol assessments and follow up visits
Affiliation to the social security regime
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinique Urbain V Elsan | Avignon | 84000 | France | |||
| Clinique Saint George |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 2 years post-procedure |
| Performance, Implant procedure Success: Surgeon comfort evaluation with procedure duration | Evaluation of surgeon 's satisfaction with procedure duration (5 options: Definitely satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Definitely dissatisfied) | at the implant procedure |
| Performance, Implant procedure Success: Surgeon comfort evaluation with size incision | Evaluation of surgeon 's satisfaction with size of incision (5 options: Definitely satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Definitely dissatisfied) | at the implant procedure |
| Performance, Implant procedure Success: Assessment of implant placement and deformation | Assessment of the implant correct placement (absence of visible deformation of the gel) at 3 months | 3 months post-procedure |
| Performance :Surgeon comfort evaluation with comfort level for insertion/implantation of the prothesis | Evaluation of surgeon's satisfaction with the usability of the device during the procedure (current implant procedure), the comfort level for insertion/implantation of the prothesis (5 options: Definitely satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Definitely dissatisfied) | Discharge Visit, an average of 24h |
| Performance : number of steps of increase in bra cup size | Overall mean number of steps of increase in bra cup size at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-procedure | 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-procedure |
| Performance : change in chest circumference at the level of the breasts | Overall mean change in chest circumference at the level of the breasts following the implant procedure analyzed as change in thoracic measure at 3 months, 1 years and 2 years post-procedure | 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-procedure |
| Performance : satisfaction with the implant size choice | Suitability of the implant size choice at the time of the procedure analyzed as the difference between the final decision of the cup size for surgery and the cup size at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years | 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-procedure |
| Performance : global satisfaction of the patient | Evaluation of global patient satisfaction at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-procedure with the BREAST EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE (BEQ55) (5 options: 1 = Very dissatisfied, 2 = Somewhat dissatisfied, 3 = Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = Somewhat satisfied, 5 = Very satisfied) | 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-procedure |
| Performance : global satisfaction of the surgeon | Surgeon satisfaction at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-procedure evaluated as :
| 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-procedure |
| Nice |
| 06105 |
| France |
| Clinique Sainte Geneviève | Paris | 75014 | France |
| Clinique Bizet | Paris | 75016 | France |
| Clinique du Rond Point des Champs Elysées | Paris | 75016 | France |
| Clinique Charcot | Sainte-Foy-lès-Lyon | 69110 | France |