Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized controlled trial is aimed to assess the protective value of prophylactic cervical cerclage against preterm birth in twin pregnancies with history of one or more preterm births without having cervical shortening in the current pregnancy.
Multiple pregnancies are high-risk pregnancies and usually associated with an increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality, mainly due to preterm births. Preterm births occur in 50% of twin pregnancies and the mean gestational age for delivery is 35.3 weeks. Ten percent of all twin births take place before 32 weeks of gestation.1 Preterm births are responsible for more than 70% of all neonatal and infant deaths.2 Prematurity can have serious consequences for the child, such as hearing difficulties, vision impairment, learning disabilities, reduced IQ, and cerebral palsy. A cervical length of ≤25 mm in twin pregnancies is a good predictor of a spontaneous preterm birth when measured around 24 weeks of gestation.3,4 Numerous interventions have been attempted in order to prevent preterm births in twin gestations, but until now, no intervention has been effective. Use of cerclage in twin pregnancies is controversial. Some experts claim that placing a cervical cerclage could increase the risk of preterm births5, Fuchs and Senat6 concluded that cervical cerclage in asymptomatic twins did not reduce the risk of PTB. This conclusion came depending on small sample sized randomized trail done on less than 50 patients.7 Available meta-analytic data remained of limited value in view of the few and small clinical studies that were included.
Although the current meta-analyses indicate the lack of efficacy of cerclage in twin pregnancies, data from the US Standard Certificate of Live Birth indicated that roughly 10% of triplets and 1.3% of twins are still receiving cerclage.8 Some authors compared the efficacy of cerclage in twin pregnancies and singleton pregnancies and showed that women with twin pregnancies who received cerclage might show beneficial obstetric outcomes similar to those of women with singleton gestations.9,10 Such practice is still in need for further validation by well-structured and powered randomized controlled trials.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | cervical cerclage between 14 and 20 weeks will be done by one of the three authors. McDonald cervical cerclage. |
|
| Group B | No Intervention | Routine antenatal care without cerclage |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical cerclage | Procedure | McDonald cervical cerclage will be applied using Mersaline braided tape with double needle. Single stitch (4 bites) will be applied as close as possible to the level of internal os. The Knot will be put either anterior or posterior according to the surgeon desire. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The incidence of preterm birth at ≤35+6, ≤33+6, and ≤31+6 weeks. | Number of preterm deliveries stratified according to gestational age groups mentioned | immediately after delivery for study cases through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The incidence of miscarriage. | Number of missed, inevitable and complete miscarriage less than 20 weeks | immediately after occurrence of miscarriage through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Incidence of cervico-vaginal infection |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnant ladies
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hytham Atia | Contact | +966538308500 | hythamatia@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Amro El Nemr | Zagazig University | Principal Investigator |
| Mohamed Lashin | Zagazig University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of medicine, Zagazig University | Recruiting | Zagazig | Sharqia Province | 44519 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D047928 | Premature Birth |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007752 | Obstetric Labor, Premature |
| D007744 | Obstetric Labor Complications |
| D011248 | Pregnancy Complications |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D023802 | Cerclage, Cervical |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013513 | Obstetric Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Number of infections diagnosed by patient complaint, clinical examination and confirmed by culture and sensitivity
| once reported or confirmed during pregnancy through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Incidences of bad Neonatal outcomes in both groups | Number of of neonates with respiratory distress, IVH, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, NICU admission | during early neonatal follow up through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |