Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Grency venous stent system in the treatment of iliac vein stenosis or occlusion.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new dedicated venous stent system (Grency) in the treatment of iliac vein stenosis or occlusion. The Grency stent system has a hybrid oblique self-expanding design, which allows precise positioning at the iliocaval confluence.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grency venous stent system | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grency venous stent system | Device | Venous stent implantation during the index procedure |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patency rate of venous stent | Freedom from target vessel revascularization ; freedom from in-stent stenosis more than 50% by venography. | 12 months post-intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The rate of procedural technical success | Procedure technical success is defined as successful deployment of stent(s) to intended target without stent fracture or migration, as assessed by the investigator during the procedure. | During procedure |
| Change in the clinical symptoms |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
8. long term bedridden or wheelchair patients; 9. the target vessel of the subject has been implanted into the iliac vein stent; 10. subjects have anticoagulant contraindications or are unable to receive long-term new oral anticoagulant therapy; 11. the investigator judged that the subjects had poor compliance and could not complete the clinical trial; 12. subjects are participating in clinical trials of other drugs or medical devices and have not yet completed the primary end point of the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital | Beijing | China | ||||
| Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Change from baseline in the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification at 3 months,6 months, and 12 months. VCSS measures 10 clinical attributes of venous disease (Pain, Varicose Veins,Venous Edema, Skin Pigmentation, Inflammation, Induration, No. Active Ulcers, Active Ulcer Size, Ulcer Duration and Compression Therapy) on a scale of 0 - 3 (Absent 0, Mild 1, Moderate 2, and Severe 3). Clinical-Etiologic-Anatomic-Pathophysiologic (CEAP) Classification is a system that describes a doctor's physical exam findings for vein problem(s), the cause of the problem(s), the location in the leg, and the mechanism responsible for the manifestation of the vein problem. For Clinicalclassification, the clinical components indicates disease severity, ranging from none (0 points) to active ulcers (6 points). |
| Baseline, 3 months,6 months, and12 months post-intervention |
| The rate of device related major adverse events(MAE) | 3,6,12 months post-intervention |
| The rate of adverse events (AE) | 3,6,12 months post-intervention |
| Shanghai |
| China |