Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To determine the efficacy of a 2-week daily programme (10 sessions) of HD-tDCS to augment antidepressant therapy in subjects with late-life depression who had residual depressive symptoms despite adequate dosage and duration of antidepressant therapy.
Background:
Hong Kong is facing a significant challenge in ageing population. A significant proportion of older adults suffered from depression. As the local population is ageing rapidly, the burden of late-life depression (LLD) will continue to increase. LLD is associated with a poorer long term prognosis, a more chronic course and a higher relapse rate comparing with adult-onset depression. Treatment response towards medication is unsatisfactory. Over 50% of patients with LLD do not achieve symptomatic remission. With the growing ageing population in Hong Kong, LLD becomes a pressing problem. The mainstream treatment of LLD is antidepressant and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Despite these methods being shown to be effective, there are limitations in each of these treatments. A new treatment option or augmentation therapy would be needed to improve the treatment response in LLD. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neurostimulation method. It applies a weak, direct electric current over the scalp region. It is a very safe intervention tool. It exerts the treatment effect probably through the change in the activity of neurons and modulation in synaptic release probability uptake and sensitivity. It enhances the long-term plasticity (LTP) and changes the rate of neurotransmitter release. High-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) allows for more accuracy and focus on targeting the specific brain region. Recent evidence suggested that tDCS and serotonin enhance each other's function. Controversial outcomes were reported in previous randomised controlled trials (RCT) focusing on adult patients with depression. There is no RCT done among patients with LLD. An open-label pilot study was conducted by our team in 2018 which showed a significant improvement in depressive symptoms and mild improvement in cognitive domains after 2 weeks of HD-tDCS intervention.
Objectives:
This study is a double-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial to test the effectiveness of HD-tDCS as augmentation therapy for antidepressants in patients with LLD. The investigators hypothesized that active HD-tDCS is significantly more effective than sham control in reducing depressive symptoms.
Design:
The current study is a 2-week intervention trial of HD-tDCS with 4-week and 12-week post-intervention observation. All eligible participants must receive at least four weeks of antidepressant treatment before the tDCS intervention. Then they will be randomised to receive either active HD-tDCS (a-HD-tDCS) or sham-HD-tDCS (s-HD-tDCS) intervention for two weeks with five sessions per week. Both the participants and the investigators responsible for assessments and data analysis will be blinded to the group allocation. Total ten sessions HD-tDCS will be delivered. Each session would last for 30 minutes. After HD-tDCS intervention, participants would continue their medications for at least for 12 more weeks until all post-intervention assessments are complete.
Data Analysis:
Primary outcome and secondary outcomes assessment would be carried out at baseline, immediately after the intervention and follow
Significance:
The result of the current study would provide further data on the effectiveness of HD-tDCS as augmentative therapy with antidepressants in LLD patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| active HD-tDCS | Active Comparator | The participants will be instructed to relax during the first 5 minutes of the session while the equipment is set up. A mild stimulation (with a level of only 2 milliamps stimulation) will be delivered for 20 minutes, with the current gradually increased and decreased over 30 seconds. The patients will be instructed to relax and remain motionless during the intervention. The administrator will closely monitor the impedance throughout each session and record any side effects experienced by the participants. The participants will be allowed 5 minutes of rest after the intervention and will be actively asked about any discomfort. Each session will last around 30 minutes, with a total of 10 sessions (two consecutive weeks of treatment for 5 days per week). |
|
| sham-HD-tDCS | Sham Comparator | The procedure for sham stimulation will be identical, except that the current will be gradually ramped down to zero after the first 30 s, thus giving the same initial sensation of HD-tDCS. The stimulator will be programmed to switch the current on and off, so no intervention by the operator will be required. The computer will be placed behind the subjects' heads so they cannot see the readout. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation | Device | The HD-tDCS will be administered by the program device called Starstim (Neuroelectrics). All participants will receive the treatment by using the same model of device. The HD-tDCS device can be portable and controlled wirelessly via computer software developed by the manufacturer. The montages will be a '4 × 1 ring set-up', which is the most commonly used HD-tDCS setting. The centre anode electrode is surrounded by four return cathode electrodes. The anode will be placed over the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex. Conductive electrode gel will be applied on the scalp at all designated electrode stimulation areas. A cap appropriate for each participants' head size will be used to ensure that the electrodes are secured in place. Impedance checks will be performed using the Starstim software before each treatment session. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the Depressive symptoms | the clinical response rate and the remission rate as measured with the HAM-D-17. A clinical response will be defined as a reduction of 50% or more in the HAM-D-17 score. A HAM-D-17 score of 7 or less will be used as an indicator of remission. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe depression. | Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 and 12 weeks after the intervention. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the Global Cognition | Using the Hong Kong Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. The total score ranges from 0-30 with higher scores indicating better cognition. | Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 and 12 weeks after the intervention. |
| Change in the Working Memory |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pak Wing Calvin Cheng | Contact | 22554486 | chengpsy@hku.hk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pak Wing Calvin Cheng | The University of Hong Kong | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Psychiatry, University of Hong Kong | Recruiting | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15879590 | Background | Chi I, Yip PS, Chiu HF, Chou KL, Chan KS, Kwan CW, Conwell Y, Caine E. Prevalence of depression and its correlates in Hong Kong's Chinese older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 May;13(5):409-16. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.5.409. | |
| 16135616 | Background | Mitchell AJ, Subramaniam H. Prognosis of depression in old age compared to middle age: a systematic review of comparative studies. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;162(9):1588-601. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.9.1588. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Measured by forward and backward digit span. |
| Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 and 12 weeks after the intervention. |
| Change in the Executive Functioning | Measured by the Trail Making Test Parts A and B. | Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 and 12 weeks after the intervention. |
| Change in the Verbal Fluency | Measured by category verbal fluency test. | Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 and 12 weeks after the intervention. |
| Change in the Attention | Measured by the Stroop test. | Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 and 12 weeks after the intervention. |
| Change in the Anxiety symptoms | Measured by the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA). It is a widely used clinician-rated scale ranging from 0-56, with higher marks represent more severe in anxiety symptoms. | Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 and 12 weeks after the intervention. |
| Change in Daily functioning | Instrumental activities of daily living will be assessed with the Hong Kong Chinese version of the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale. The daily functioning would be assessed with a total score ranging from 0 to 27. A higher score indicates a higher functioning level. | Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 4 and 12 weeks after the intervention. |
| Change in Adverse effects and risk indicators | checklist of potential adverse effects associated with t-DCS administration will be generated from the available literature. Risk indicators such as suicidal risk or severe self-neglect that would necessitate immediate changes to treatment will be directly assessed according to the risk and needs. | Assessed immediately after each (in total 10) individual treatment session. |
| 16582045 | Background | Schatzberg A, Roose S. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of venlafaxine and fluoxetine in geriatric outpatients with major depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;14(4):361-70. doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000194645.70869.3b. |
| 12634292 | Background | Blazer DG. Depression in late life: review and commentary. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Mar;58(3):249-65. doi: 10.1093/gerona/58.3.m249. |
| Background | World Health Organization. Depression. Fact sheet No. 369/October 2012 |
| 12182927 | Background | Schulz R, Drayer RA, Rollman BL. Depression as a risk factor for non-suicide mortality in the elderly. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Aug 1;52(3):205-25. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01423-3. |
| Background | Baldwin RC. Refractory depression in late life: a review of treatment options. Rev Clin Gerontol. 1996;6(4):343-8. |
| 27223853 | Background | Alam M, Truong DQ, Khadka N, Bikson M. Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). Phys Med Biol. 2016 Jun 21;61(12):4506-21. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/12/4506. Epub 2016 May 25. |
| 23149292 | Background | Kuo HI, Bikson M, Datta A, Minhas P, Paulus W, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA. Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 x 1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study. Brain Stimul. 2013 Jul;6(4):644-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Oct 13. |
| 23759278 | Background | Zimmerman M, Martinez JH, Young D, Chelminski I, Dalrymple K. Severity classification on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):384-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.04.028. Epub 2013 Jun 4. |
| 22236735 | Background | Kalu UG, Sexton CE, Loo CK, Ebmeier KP. Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of major depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2012 Sep;42(9):1791-800. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711003059. Epub 2012 Jan 12. |
| 3167442 | Background | Zheng YP, Zhao JP, Phillips M, Liu JB, Cai MF, Sun SQ, Huang MF. Validity and reliability of the Chinese Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1988 May;152:660-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.152.5.660. |
| 29169814 | Result | Nikolin S, Huggins C, Martin D, Alonzo A, Loo CK. Safety of repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation: A systematic review. Brain Stimul. 2018 Mar-Apr;11(2):278-288. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Oct 31. |
| 27965533 | Result | Das S, Holland P, Frens MA, Donchin O. Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Neuronal Functions. Front Neurosci. 2016 Nov 30;10:550. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00550. eCollection 2016. |
| 20434997 | Result | Fritsch B, Reis J, Martinowich K, Schambra HM, Ji Y, Cohen LG, Lu B. Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron. 2010 Apr 29;66(2):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.035. |
| 23615118 | Result | Brunoni AR, Kemp AH, Shiozawa P, Cordeiro Q, Valiengo LC, Goulart AC, Coprerski B, Lotufo PA, Brunoni D, Perez AB, Fregni F, Bensenor IM. Impact of 5-HTTLPR and BDNF polymorphisms on response to sertraline versus transcranial direct current stimulation: implications for the serotonergic system. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Nov;23(11):1530-40. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 Apr 21. |
| 26329381 | Result | Kuo HI, Paulus W, Batsikadze G, Jamil A, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA. Chronic Enhancement of Serotonin Facilitates Excitatory Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation-Induced Neuroplasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Apr;41(5):1223-30. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.270. Epub 2015 Sep 2. |
| 21840287 | Result | Javadi AH, Walsh V. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates declarative memory. Brain Stimul. 2012 Jul;5(3):231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 26. |
| 21665534 | Result | Mulquiney PG, Hoy KE, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB. Improving working memory: exploring the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec;122(12):2384-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jun 12. |
| 27056623 | Result | Brunoni AR, Moffa AH, Fregni F, Palm U, Padberg F, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis ZJ, Bennabi D, Haffen E, Alonzo A, Loo CK. Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data. Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;208(6):522-31. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.164715. Epub 2016 Apr 7. |
| 31695391 | Result | Bares M, Brunovsky M, Stopkova P, Hejzlar M, Novak T. Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation (tDCS) Versus Venlafaxine ER In The Treatment Of Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Center Study With Open-Label, Follow-Up. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Oct 23;15:3003-3014. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S226577. eCollection 2019. |
| 29111077 | Result | Loo CK, Husain MM, McDonald WM, Aaronson S, O'Reardon JP, Alonzo A, Weickert CS, Martin DM, McClintock SM, Mohan A, Lisanby SH; International Consortium of Research in tDCS (ICRT). International randomized-controlled trial of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in depression. Brain Stimul. 2018 Jan-Feb;11(1):125-133. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Oct 27. |
| 25179996 | Result | Doruk D, Gray Z, Bravo GL, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Effects of tDCS on executive function in Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett. 2014 Oct 17;582:27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.08.043. Epub 2014 Aug 30. |
| 22104190 | Result | Borckardt JJ, Bikson M, Frohman H, Reeves ST, Datta A, Bansal V, Madan A, Barth K, George MS. A pilot study of the tolerability and effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on pain perception. J Pain. 2012 Feb;13(2):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Nov 21. |
| 36307858 | Derived | Ngan STJ, Chan LK, Chan WC, Lam LCW, Li WK, Lim K, Or E, Pang PF, Poon TK, Wong MCM, Wu YKA, Cheng PWC. High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) as augmentation therapy in late-life depression (LLD) with suboptimal response to treatment-a study protocol for a double-blinded randomized sham-controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Oct 28;23(1):914. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06855-z. |