Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Programmed Intermittent Bolus Infusions of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block

Comparison of Programmed Intermittent Bolus Infusions of Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Paravertebral block (PVB) has been regarded as effective regimen for pain control after cardiac surgery. As a novel analgesia technique, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been reported to provide effective analgesia after thoracic and cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that the ESPB is non-inferior to PVB in treating pain in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting has recently gained with popularity in treatment of coronary artery disease. Compared with conventional approach, it has advantages of less trauma and rapid recovery, but postoperative pain is severe, which may increase the risk of cardiopulmonary complications and cause chronic pain. Therefore, perioperative analgesia is crucial in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.

Paravertebral block (PVB) has been regarded as effective regimen for pain control after cardiac surgery. As a novel analgesia technique, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been reported to provide effective analgesia after thoracic and cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that the ESPB is non-inferior to PVB in treating pain in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.

Inclusion Criteria:

• patients undergoing elective minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Contraindications to regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, infection of the skin at the site of needle puncture area, et al)
2. Morbid obesity (body mass index > 35 kg/m2)
3. Allergy to any of the study drugs
4. Chronic opioid use or history of opioid abuse.
5. Inability to understand pain score