Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Most persons living with dementia (PlwD) have multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Managing MCC typically involves adhering to clinical practice guidelines for single diseases. This approach often results in burdensome care that usually does not reflect what matters most to patients. To address the challenges of caring for patients with MCC, Patient Priorities Care (PPC) was developed - a process that aligns treatment recommendations with patient priorities rather than single-disease guidelines, to improve care. Successful completion of this pragmatic pilot project will help determine how to best embedded PPC in a Healthcare system that serves a large Hispanic population. The investigators will determine if the benefits previously reported with the use of PPC hold in Hispanics with dementia.
STUDY OBJECTIVES
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
PlwD from minority groups experience more difficulties and poorer outcomes compared to their Non-Hispanic White (NHW) counterparts. Hispanics are the fastest-growing underrepresented population in the USA and have 1.5 times higher risk of dementia compared to NHW. Hispanics rely heavily on their families and there is a cultural expectation of families to provide care to members in need. Recent data report older Hispanics prefer care at home rather than professional care. These cultural differences and language barriers play key roles in shaping healthcare priorities and how priorities impact outcomes among Hispanics.
STUDY DESIGN For the adaptation 5 Hispanic patients will be included and for the feasibility test 20 Hispanic patients will be included.
The process will be as follows:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient Priorities Care (PPC) Adaptation | Other | 5 Hispanic patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) and no dementia. In order to adapt PPC for Hispanics with MCC, five Hispanics with MCC will go through the 2 parts of the PPC approach: 1) Priority setting; and 2) Care alignment. |
|
| PPC Feasibility Testing | Other | 20 Hispanic patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCC), including dementia. In order to adapt PPC for Hispanics with MCC and dementia, twenty Hispanics with MCC and dementia will go through the 2 parts of the PPC approach: 1) Priority setting; and 2) Care alignment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient Priorities Care (PPC) Approach | Behavioral | First, identify patient priorities, and second align care received with those priorities. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Self-reported Perceived Value of Patient Priorities Care (PPC) Approach | Participants were asked to grade how valuable they thought the PPC approach was. We report the percentage of participants who responded "valuable" or "very valuable" on a scale from 1 to 5 with 1 representing "not valuable" and 5 representing "very valuable". | On average one month after baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Documented Changes in the Electronic Health Record That Indicate Care Alignment Was Done | Dichotomous variable (yes vs no). Review of medical records to identify changes in care based on priorities identified by participants as a result of the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach. All medical charts were reviewed for language indicating that the primary care providers used the patient priorities to align the care provided to the patient. The default sentence provided to the providers was "Based on the patient's specific priorities, including outcome goals and care preferences, we decided to..." If information resembling this wording was found, then Care alignment was marked as positive. Otherwise, it was marked as negative. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
A) For adaptation (n=5)
Exclusion Criteria:
A) For adaptation (n=5)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Aanand D Naik, MD | The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston | Galveston | Texas | 77555 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33760091 | Background | Tinetti ME, Costello DM, Naik AD, Davenport C, Hernandez-Bigos K, Van Liew JR, Esterson J, Kiwak E, Dindo L. Outcome Goals and Health Care Preferences of Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211271. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1271. | |
| 32687218 | Background | Freytag J, Dindo L, Catic A, Johnson AL, Bush Amspoker A, Gravier A, Dawson DB, Tinetti ME, Naik AD. Feasibility of Clinicians Aligning Health Care with Patient Priorities in Geriatrics Ambulatory Care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Sep;68(9):2112-2116. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16662. Epub 2020 Jul 20. |
Not provided
Not provided
De-identified data of participants and their caregivers will be made available to other researchers once results have been released to clinicaltrials.gov.
Once results have been submitted to clinicaltrials.gov the listed materials will be available to share with other researchers.
Data will be shared with researchers upon request to the Pi or Co-PI of the study.
Not provided
The number of participants started/completed represents the number of individual participants.
Participants were recruited based on Hispanic ethnicity from a UTMB Galveston outpatient clinic, participants without cognitive impairment, and with cognitive impairment. The first participant was enrolled on May 31st, 2022 and the last participant was enrolled in January 2024.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Patient Priorities Care (PPC) Adaptation | Participants are Hispanic patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) and no dementia. Participants went through two parts of the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach: 1) Priority Setting; and 2) Care Alignment |
| FG001 | PPC Feasibility Testing | Participants are Hispanics participants diagnosed mild cognitive impairment or dementia and multiple chronic conditions (MCC) were recruited. They went through two parts of the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach: 1) Priority Setting; and 2) Care Alignment |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Participants from the adaptation phase were different from those in the feasibility phase. Baseline Characteristics were not collected for caregivers.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | PPC Adaptation | Five participants with multiple chronic conditions |
| BG001 | PPC Feasibility | Sixteen with multiple chronic conditions and cognitive impairment |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Self-reported Perceived Value of Patient Priorities Care (PPC) Approach | Participants were asked to grade how valuable they thought the PPC approach was. We report the percentage of participants who responded "valuable" or "very valuable" on a scale from 1 to 5 with 1 representing "not valuable" and 5 representing "very valuable". | One participant from the Adaptation arm was lost to follow-up after the initial visit. In the Feasibility testing group one participant withdrew after consenting and before the first visit, and one participant was lost to follow-up after completing the intervention. Only patients are included in the analysis, caregivers are not active participants in the study. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | On average one month after baseline |
|
18 months
1 participant from the adaptation and feasibility group did not complete the intervention. Hence, we did not assess adverse events in them.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Patient Priorities Care (PPC) Adaptation | Participants are Hispanic patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) and no dementia. Participants went through two parts of the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach: 1) Priority Setting; and 2) Care Alignment |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael Samper-Ternent | The University of Texas Medical Branch | 8322057994 | rasamper@utmb.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 24, 2025 | Jun 24, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000071069 | Multiple Chronic Conditions |
| D003704 | Dementia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
The study has two phases: 1) an initial adaptation phase; and 2) a feasibility testing phase. For the adaptation phase 5 Hispanics with multiple chronic condition and without dementia will be invited to participate. These participants will need to consent to be part of the study. For the second phase, the investigators will determine if participants with dementia have capacity by asking their primary care providers or by administering the telephone version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. If a score of less than 12 is obtained, the caregiver will be asked to consent for both participants.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Adapted PPC | Behavioral | First, identify patient priorities, and second align care received with those priorities. |
|
| Approximately one month after baseline |
| 31589281 | Background | Tinetti ME, Naik AD, Dindo L, Costello DM, Esterson J, Geda M, Rosen J, Hernandez-Bigos K, Smith CD, Ouellet GM, Kang G, Lee Y, Blaum C. Association of Patient Priorities-Aligned Decision-Making With Patient Outcomes and Ambulatory Health Care Burden Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1688-1697. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4235. |
| 30281777 | Background | Blaum CS, Rosen J, Naik AD, Smith CD, Dindo L, Vo L, Hernandez-Bigos K, Esterson J, Geda M, Ferris R, Costello D, Acampora D, Meehan T, Tinetti ME. Feasibility of Implementing Patient Priorities Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct;66(10):2009-2016. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15465. Epub 2018 Oct 3. |
| 30281794 | Background | Naik AD, Dindo LN, Van Liew JR, Hundt NE, Vo L, Hernandez-Bigos K, Esterson J, Geda M, Rosen J, Blaum CS, Tinetti ME. Development of a Clinically Feasible Process for Identifying Individual Health Priorities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Oct;66(10):1872-1879. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15437. Epub 2018 Oct 3. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
| No |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Cognitive impairment | The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) - is a validated tool for cognitive screening. We used the version validated for assessments on the phone and we used the validated Spanish Version. If a MoCA score was below 8, the participants was deemed unable to consent for themselves and the caregiver was asked to consent for them, while the participants provided verbal assent. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Multiple Chronic Conditions | Participants with more than 2 chronic conditions identified in their medical record | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | PPC Feasibility Testing | Participants are Hispanics participants diagnosed mild cognitive impairment or dementia and multiple chronic conditions (MCC) were recruited. They went through two parts of the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach: 1) Priority Setting; and 2) Care Alignment |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Documented Changes in the Electronic Health Record That Indicate Care Alignment Was Done | Dichotomous variable (yes vs no). Review of medical records to identify changes in care based on priorities identified by participants as a result of the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach. All medical charts were reviewed for language indicating that the primary care providers used the patient priorities to align the care provided to the patient. The default sentence provided to the providers was "Based on the patient's specific priorities, including outcome goals and care preferences, we decided to..." If information resembling this wording was found, then Care alignment was marked as positive. Otherwise, it was marked as negative. | One participant was lost to follow-up after baseline and did not complete the study in the Adaptation group. In the feasibility group one participants withdrew before the PPC approach could be completed. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Approximately one month after baseline |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 4 |
| EG001 | PPC Feasibility Testing | Participants are Hispanics participants diagnosed mild cognitive impairment or dementia and multiple chronic conditions (MCC) were recruited. They went through two parts of the Patient Priorities Care (PPC) approach: 1) Priority Setting; and 2) Care Alignment | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |