Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Yale Cardiovascular Research Group | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and performance of the EMBLOK EPS during TAVR by randomized comparison with a commercially available embolic protection device. The targeted study population consists of patients meeting FDA-approved indications for TAVR with commercially available transcatheter heart valve systems.
This prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial will enroll up to a total of 532 subjects undergoing TAVR at up to 30 investigational sites in the United States. All subjects will undergo clinical follow-up (including detailed neurological assessments) in-hospital and at 30 days.
Embolic stroke remains a major complication for TAVR, resulting in a two-fold increase in 1-year mortality. Embolic protection devices have been developed to filter embolic debris during the procedure, potentially reducing the occurrence of neurologic events associated with TAVR. The EMBLOK EPS may improve on currently available devices by capturing and retrieving debris directed toward all 3 cerebral vessels in the aortic arch as well as the descending aorta.
The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and performance of the EMBLOK EPS during TAVR by randomized comparison with a commercially available embolic protection device. With this comparator device, the left subclavian artery and descending aorta are not protected.
The targeted study population consists of patients meeting FDA-approved indications for TAVR with commercially available transcatheter heart valve systems.
This prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial will enroll up to a total of 532 subjects undergoing TAVR at up to 30 investigational sites in the United States.
Prior to enrollment of the first randomized subject at each site, each site will enroll 2 Roll-In subjects (up to 60 subjects total), who will not be randomized but will receive the EMBLOK EPS during TAVR.
In the randomized cohort, up to 422 subjects meeting eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 (stratified by operative risk and study site) to one of two treatment arms:
In addition, a nested registry will enroll up to 50 subjects who meet clinical eligibility criteria and are anatomically suitable for the EMBLOK EPS, but whose anatomy precludes the use of the SENTINEL CPS.
All subjects will undergo clinical follow-up (including detailed neurological assessments) in-hospital and at 30 days.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| EMBLOK™ Embolic Protection System | Experimental | Device Description: The EMBLOK™ Embolic Protection System ("EMBLOK EPS") is a sterile, single use system designed to capture and remove debris (e.g., thrombus, calcium, atheroma) dislodged during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures. The device is currently for investigational use only. When Device Will Be Used: Roll-in: Prior to enrollment of the first randomized subject at each site, each site will enroll 2 Roll-In subjects, who will not be randomized but will receive the EMBLOK EPS during TAVR. Randomized: Up to 422 subjects meeting eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1. The experimental "intervention" arm is utilizing EMBLOK EPS during TAVR (up to 211 subjects). Nested registry: Up to 50 subjects who meet clinical eligibility criteria and are anatomically suitable for the EMBLOK EPS, but whose anatomy precludes the use of the SENTINEL CPS. |
|
| SENTINEL™ Cerebral Protection System | Active Comparator | Device Description: The control comparator is the commercially-available SENTINEL™ Cerebral Protection System ("SENTINEL CPS") (Boston Scientific Corp., Marlborough, MA, US), a dual-filter protection device designed to capture and remove debris dislodged during TAVR procedures. The SENTINEL CPS is indicated for use as an embolic protection device to capture and remove thrombus/debris while performing TAVR procedures. The diameters of the arteries at the site of filter placement should be between 9.0 mm - 15.0 mm for the brachiocephalic and 6.5 mm - 10.0 mm in the left common carotid. When Device Will Be Used: In the randomized cohort, up to 422 subjects meeting eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 (stratified by operative risk and study site). The active comparator "control" arm is utilizing SENTINEL CPS during TAVR (up to 211 subjects). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMBLOK™ Embolic Protection System ("EMBLOK EPS") | Device | The EMBLOK EPS is intended to capture and remove thrombus/debris while performing transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of the composite of all-cause mortality, all stroke (disabling or non-disabling) and transient ischemic attack (TIA), and Acute Kidney Injury Stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy), according to VARC-2 definitions | The primary safety and efficacy endpoint is combined safety and efficacy at 30 days, defined as a composite of the following VARC-2 defined components:
| Evaluated at 30-day post-procedure (TAVR) follow-up visit |
| Debris capture, defined as the average number of captured particles ≥150 µm in diameter, as assessed by independent histologic analysis | The co-primary filtration efficacy endpoint is debris capture, defined as the average number of captured particles ≥150 μm in diameter, as assessed by independent histologic analysis. | Evaluated at the time of the TAVR procedure (during the intervention/procedure) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of the composite of all-cause mortality, all stroke (disabling or non-disabling) and transient ischemic attack (TIA), and Acute Kidney Injury Stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy), according to VARC-2 definitions | Combined safety and efficacy is defined as a composite of the following VARC-2 defined components, evaluated post-procedure and in-hospital:
|
Not provided
Clinical Eligibility Criteria:
Clinical Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects must meet ALL the following criteria to be eligible for participation in the study:
Clinical Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects will be excluded if ANY of the following criteria apply:
Anatomic Eligibility Criteria:
General Anatomic Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects meeting any of the following criteria will not be eligible for participation in the study:
Additional Anatomic Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects with any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in the Randomized Cohort, but are eligible for participation in the Roll-In and Nested Registry cohorts (provided they meet all other eligibility criteria):
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hemal Gada, MD | Heart and Vascular Institute, UPMC Pinnacle | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dignity Health Chandler Regional Medical Center | Chandler | Arizona | 85224 | United States | ||
| St Joseph's Providence |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial will enroll up to a total of 532 subjects undergoing TAVR at up to 30 investigational sites in the United States.
Prior to enrollment of the first randomized subject at each site, each site will enroll 2 Roll-In subjects (up to 60 subjects total), who will not be randomized but will receive the EMBLOK EPS during TAVR.
In the randomized cohort, up to 422 subjects meeting eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 (stratified by operative risk and study site) to one of two treatment arms:
In addition, a nested registry will enroll up to 50 subjects who meet clinical eligibility criteria and are anatomically suitable for the EMBLOK EPS, but whose anatomy precludes the use of the SENTINEL CPS.
Not provided
Not provided
This is a single-blind study. The following individuals will be blinded to the subject's treatment allocation:
Un-blinding will occur only after the database has been locked for the analysis of the primary endpoint or to protect subject rights, welfare, or well-being at the request of the DMC. A site investigator may also reveal treatment allocation to an individual subject if deemed necessary due to complication or injury.
| SENTINEL™ Cerebral Protection System | Device | The SENTINEL CPS is intended to capture and remove thrombus/debris while performing transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures. |
|
| Evaluated immediately after the intervention/procedure, up until discharge from hospital or up until 7 days post procedure, which ever occurs first. |
| Incidence of all-cause mortality (VARC-2 defined), subclassified as cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular mortality | Mortality (VARC-2 defined), evaluated in-hospital, defined as: • All-cause mortality
| Evaluated immediately after the intervention/procedure, up until discharge from hospital or up until 7 days post procedure, which ever occurs first. |
| Incidence of stroke (sub-classified as ischemic, hemorrhagic, or undetermined, and as disabling or non-disabling) and TIA, according to VARC-2 and NeuroARC definitions | Neurological Events (VARC-2 and NeuroARC defined)
| Evaluated immediately after the intervention/procedure, up until discharge from hospital or up to 7 days post-procedure, and at the 30 day follow-up visit. |
| Incidence of acute kidney injury (AKIN classification), subclassified as stage 1, 2, or 3 | Acute Kidney Injury (AKIN Classification)
| Evaluated immediately after the intervention/procedure, up until discharge from hospital or up to 7 days post-procedure, and at the 30 day follow-up visit. |
| Incidence of life-threatening or disabling bleeding and major bleeding (VARC-2 defined) | Bleeding Complications (VARC-2 defined)
| Evaluated immediately after the intervention/procedure, up until discharge from hospital or up to 7 days post-procedure, and at the 30 day follow-up visit. |
| Incidence of major vascular complications | Vascular Complications • Major vascular complications | Evaluated immediately after the intervention/procedure, up until discharge from hospital or up to 7 days post-procedure, and at the 30 day follow-up visit. |
| Incidence of the composite of all stroke (disabling or non-disabling) and transient ischemic attack (TIA), and Acute Kidney Injury Stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy), and systemic embolization | Major adverse embolic events (MAEE) MAEE will be reported as a composite and components [evaluated post-procedure and in-hospital]:
| Evaluated immediately after the intervention/procedure, up until discharge from hospital or up until 7 days post procedure, which ever occurs first. |
| Prevalence of captured embolic debris, as assessed by an independent Pathology Core Laboratory | Gross and histologic evaluation of captured embolic debris, including particle presence, will be assessed by an independent Pathology Core Laboratory. | Evaluated at the time of the TAVR procedure (during the intervention/procedure) |
| Number of captured particles, as assessed by an independent Pathology Core Laboratory | Gross and histologic evaluation of captured embolic debris, including particle count, will be assessed by an independent Pathology Core Laboratory. | Evaluated at the time of the TAVR procedure (during the intervention/procedure) |
| Diameter of captured particles (in mm), as assessed by an independent Pathology Core Laboratory | Gross and histologic evaluation of captured embolic debris, including particle size, will be assessed by an independent Pathology Core Laboratory. | Evaluated at the time of the TAVR procedure (during the intervention/procedure) |
| Material composition of captured particles, as assessed by an independent Pathology Core Laboratory | Gross and histologic evaluation of captured embolic debris, including particle composition, will be assessed by an independent Pathology Core Laboratory. | Evaluated at the time of the TAVR procedure (during the intervention/procedure) |
| Neurocognitive Measures: NIHSS assessment | NIHSS worsening, defined as an increase of 2 or more points from baseline, assessed on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (scores range from 0 to 42; higher scores mean worse outcome). | Evaluated immediately after the intervention/procedure, up until discharge from hospital or up to 7 days post-procedure, and at the 30 day follow-up visit. |
| Neurocognitive Measures: MoCA assessment | MoCA worsening, defined as a decrease of 2 or more points from baseline, assessed on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (scores range from 0 to 30; higher scores mean better outcomes). | Evaluated immediately after the intervention/procedure, up until discharge from hospital or up to 7 days post-procedure, and at the 30 day follow-up visit. |
| Rate of successful device delivery to the site of filter placement and successful deployment of the device | Secondary Performance Endpoint: • Successful device deployment, defined as ability to successfully deliver the device to the site of filter placement and successfully deploy the device. | Evaluated at the time of the TAVR procedure (during the intervention/procedure) |
| Rate of successful device positioning followed by maintenance of positioning for the duration of the TAVR procedure, as assessed by an independent Angiographic Core Laboratory | Secondary Performance Endpoint: • Successful device positioning, defined as ability to position the device and to maintain the device in place for the duration of the TAVR procedure (as assessed by an independent Angiographic Core Laboratory) | Evaluated at the time of the TAVR procedure (during the intervention/procedure) |
| Rate of successful retrieval of the intact device | Secondary Performance Endpoint: • Successful device retrieval, defined as ability to retrieve the device intact | Evaluated at the time of the TAVR procedure (during the intervention/procedure) |
| Rate of successful deployment, positioning, and retrieval of the device | Secondary Performance Endpoint: • Device success, defined as successful deployment, positioning and retrieval | Evaluated at the time of the TAVR procedure (during the intervention/procedure) |
| Rate of successful deployment, positioning, and retrieval of the device without embolic protection device-related serious adverse events | Secondary Performance Endpoint: • Procedure success, defined as device success in the absence of in-hospital embolic protection device-related serious adverse events | Evaluated at the time of the TAVR procedure (during the intervention/procedure) |
| Orange |
| California |
| 92868 |
| United States |
| Sutter Medical Center Sacramento | Sacramento | California | 95816 | United States |
| Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital | Santa Barbara | California | 93105 | United States |
| Los Robles Hospital and Medical Center | Thousand Oaks | California | 91360 | United States |
| Hartford Hospital | Hartford | Connecticut | 06106 | United States |
| MedStar Washington Hospital Center | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20010 | United States |
| Advocate Christ Medical Center | Oak Lawn | Illinois | 60453 | United States |
| University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics | Iowa City | Iowa | 52242 | United States |
| Ascension Via Christi Hospitals Wichita, Inc. | Wichita | Kansas | 67226 | United States |
| Cardiovascular Institute of the South | Houma | Louisiana | 70360 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| University of Michigan | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| Henry Ford Hospital | Detroit | Michigan | 48202 | United States |
| Corewell Health | Grand Rapids | Michigan | 49503 | United States |
| University of Washington School of Medicine Barnes Jewish Hospital | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Integris Baptist Medical Center | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73112 | United States |
| UPMC Pinnacle Harrisburg | Harrisburg | Pennsylvania | 17101 | United States |
| Lankenau Medical Center | Wynnewood | Pennsylvania | 19091 | United States |
| The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Baylor Scott and White The Heart Hospital Plano- Baylor Institute of Research | Plano | Texas | 75093 | United States |
| Methodist Hospital | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Sentra Norfolk General Hospital | Norfolk | Virginia | 23507 | United States |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001024 | Aortic Valve Stenosis |
| D000082862 | Aortic Valve Disease |
| D001022 | Aortic Valve Insufficiency |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D014694 | Ventricular Outflow Obstruction |
Not provided
Not provided