Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is an open-label, single arm, single center, non-randomized feasibility study of the Muse MRgFUS System in subjects with breast cancer. Subjects will undergo partial ablation of half (≤50%) of one of their tumors (if multifocal or multicentric disease) followed by surgical resection per standard of care. The partial tumor ablation design will ensure that no information is lost that would impact the subject's standard of clinical care. Because current care often includes testing on the tumor, retaining a portion of viable tumor is advised by the clinical team. To ensure viable tissue confirmation, patients will be enrolled in two cohorts as described in the protocol. The investigators will use imaging correlation, histological evaluation, and subject reported outcomes to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the Muse MRgFUS System. This proposed study will adhere to the guidelines of subjects receiving a timely tumor resection after diagnosis. All subjects will undergo the definitive procedure of surgical resection per standard of care. Surgical resection cannot be delayed as a result of the ablation and should occur within 6 weeks after the decision to proceed with surgical resection. In cases where a surgery may occur outside of the 6 week window, prior approval from the external DSMC should be obtained. While MRgFUS ablation is designed to be a breast-conserving technique, the investigators will enroll patients that are undergoing any surgical resection, including both lumpectomy or mastectomy. Both surgical procedures will allow assessment of the defined primary, secondary and exploratory objectives.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Muse MRgFUS System | Experimental | Subjects will undergo partial ablation of half (≤50%) of one of their tumors (if multifocal or multicentric disease) followed by surgical resection per standard of care. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse MRgFUS System | Device | The intended use of the device is to thermally ablate breast tissue under magnetic resonance image guidance. The thermal ablation is performed non-invasively using extracorporeal focused ultrasound. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| frequency of adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs) characterized by type | evaluate the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of soft tissue ablation with the Muse MRgFUS system as assessed by subject-reported procedural pain and incidence of device- and procedure-related adverse device effects and adverse events | 2 months |
| frequency of adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs) characterized by severity (as defined by the NCI CTCAE, version 5.0) | evaluate the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of soft tissue ablation with the Muse MRgFUS system as assessed by subject-reported procedural pain and incidence of device- and procedure-related adverse device effects and adverse events | 2 months |
| frequency of adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs) characterized by seriousness | evaluate the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of soft tissue ablation with the Muse MRgFUS system as assessed by subject-reported procedural pain and incidence of device- and procedure-related adverse device effects and adverse events | 2 months |
| frequency of adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs) characterized by duration | evaluate the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of soft tissue ablation with the Muse MRgFUS system as assessed by subject-reported procedural pain and incidence of device- and procedure-related adverse device effects and adverse events | 2 months |
| frequency of adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs) characterized by relationship to the investigational intervention reported during and after the procedure as compared to baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate ablation efficacy by pathologic assessment | estimate ablation efficacy | 1 month |
| Disease-free survival (DFS) as defined as the time from the date of ablation to the date of first recurrence or death from any cause |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject is able to speak and understand English.
Female subjects 18 years of age or older with invasive breast cancer undergoing surgery
ECOG < 2.
ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Physical Status Classification Scale assessment of I-II.
Adequate breast size for MUSE device assessed by physician prior to study enrollment.
Able to provide informed consent and willing to sign an approved consent form that conforms to federal and institutional guidelines.
Adequate Renal Function defined as an eGFR > 30 mL/min/1.73.
Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception as described in Section 5.4.1.
Negative pregnancy test or evidence of post-menopausal status or evidence of permanent surgical sterilization (i.e. bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, or hysterectomy). The post-menopausal status will be defined as having been amenorrhoeic for 12 months without an alternative medical cause. The following age-specific requirements apply:
Women < 50 years of age:
---Amenorrhoeic for ≥ 12 months following cessation of exogenous hormonal treatments; and
----Luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels in the post-menopausal range for the institution.
Women ≥ 50 years of age:
Exclusion Criteria:
Additional Exclusion Criteria for Cohort 1 patients only
Female subjects 18 years of age or older with unilateral, unifocal invasive breast cancer undergoing lumpectomy
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janna Espinosa | Contact | 801-585-0571 | janna.espinosa@hci.utah.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Cindy Matsen, MD | Huntsman Cancer Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huntsman Cancer Institute at University of Utah | Recruiting | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84112 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
This is an open-label, single arm, single center, non-randomized feasibility study of the Muse MRgFUS System in subjects with breast cancer.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
evaluate the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of soft tissue ablation with the Muse MRgFUS system as assessed by subject-reported procedural pain and incidence of device- and procedure-related adverse device effects and adverse events
| 2 months |
estimate disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years post ablation
| 5 years |
| Overall survival (OS) as defined as the time from registration until death from any cause | estimate overall survival in this study population at 5 years post ablation | 5 years |
| Evaluate ablation efficacy by MRI treatment assessment metrics of thermal dose | estimate ablation efficacy | 1 month |
| Evaluate ablation efficacy by T1-weighted non-perfused volume. | estimate ablation efficacy | 1 month |
| Evaluate how heat-induced pathways effect associations between vascular organization and immune cell infiltration. | Analysis via bulk RNA sequencing data | 5 years |
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |