Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| QUE 20-023 | Other Grant/Funding Number | VA Quality Enhancement Research initiative (QUERI) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Implementing Group Physical Therapy (PT) for Veterans with Knee Osteoarthritis (OA): Function QUERI 2.0 (Group PT) aims to implement, evaluate and sustain Group PT in 16 VA sites using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid design framework, which will compare implementation strategies while also gathering information about the clinical intervention and related outcomes.
Knee OA is a common and often disabling health condition that affects 14 million people in the US, and rates are about twice as high among Veterans than the general population. Forty-three percent of VA healthcare users report a diagnosis of arthritis (primarily OA), and of these, 63% report activity limitations due to joint symptoms. The prevalence of OA is expected to rise dramatically over the next several decades, and this will place increasing demand on the VA to provide core, evidence-based components of knee OA care, including PT. Many of the negative effects of knee OA can be successfully mitigated through PT, a recommended core component of treatment; however, many VA healthcare users with knee OA do not receive PT, and a key barrier is the high demand for PT services in the VA. Therefore, it is important to implement efficient, effective models of physical therapy care delivery for Veterans with knee OA.
Group PT for knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a 6-session group outpatient program developed by an interdisciplinary team of investigators, clinicians and administrators at the Durham VA and funded by the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUE 20-023). In a previously conducted (at the Durham VA) randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing group-based PT vs. traditional individual PT for knee OA, group PT resulted in equivalent or greater improvements in pain and functional outcomes compared with individual PT. This is important because the group-based model provides care to more Veterans with fewer staffing resources, thereby increasing access and efficiency.
In this trial, the investigators plan to implement the group PT clinical program at a minimum of 16 VA medical centers using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid design framework ,with sites enrolled and randomized to receive standard implementation support (foundational Replicating Effective Programs or foundational REP) or a higher-intensity implementation support (enhanced REP), including additional facilitation, self-organization, and team building support for sites that do not meet adoption goals at 6 months or sustainment goals at 9 months.
Objectives. The investigators plan to develop scalable approaches to implement and sustain Group PT as well as evaluate implementation with foundational REP versus the enhanced-implementation strategy (enhanced REP).
Methodology. To evaluate implementation, the investigators will randomize sites 1:1 to either foundational REP or enhanced REP (enREP). The investigators will use generalized linear models to examine the effect of foundational vs. enhanced REP on implementation outcomes at 12 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foundational REP | Active Comparator | Foundational REP uses the Replicating Effective Program implementation strategy and includes 5 elements that were developed and tested in our prior Function QUERI work: Stakeholder engagement; Toolkit; SharePoint access for clinical program training materials; Data dashboard to assist sites with tracking their own data; and Diffusion Networks to promote peer-to-peer sharing and implementation support. |
|
| Enhanced REP | Experimental | EnREP begins with the same activities as foundational REP. Sites that do not meet EBP-specific a priori benchmarks reflecting adoption within 6 months will continue with foundational REP and will receive higher intensity support for a period of 6 months (enREP). Additionally, sites randomized to enREP that met adoption benchmarks but did do not meet the sustainment benchmark, will also receive intensified implementation support for the remainder of the study period (3 months). The higher intensity support will include one-on-one calls approximately every 3 to 4 weeks between site implementation teams and a trained practice facilitator (from Function QUERI team). The facilitator will coach individual sites using techniques, processes, and activities to help teams make decisions and identify and solve problems. Facilitators' actions will depend on each site's needs and clinical context. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implementation Strategy: Foundational REP | Other | The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for group PT sites that have not met implementation adoption benchmarks, specifically Foundational REP vs. Enhanced REP. The investigators propose that low intensity implementation support that promotes adapting Group PT for context and provides tools for ongoing evaluation (defined as foundational REP), will be sufficient for some but not all sites to successfully implement group PT as a clinical service. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Penetration | Penetration is defined as the average number of patients enrolling in the group physical therapy (PT) program on a monthly basis (defined as completing at least one class). | 7-12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fidelity | Fidelity will be the average number of group PT sessions attended by patients who enroll in the program. | 7-12 months |
| Adoption | Adoption will be defined as: 1) Delivery of Group PT as a clinical service (delivery of at least 1 Group PT class) by the VA Medical Center, and 2) Enrollment of at least 5 patients. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Participating sites must meet the following criteria: 1) Clinical personnel on staff to conduct initial evaluations and lead group classes (e,g, physical therapist, PT assistant, kinesiotherapist): this should include at least 1 primary person and 1 back-up person to cover all aspects of program delivery, 2) Offer outpatient PT service, 3) Space to conduct group sessions (if implementing in-person Group PT classes), and (4) Submission of a signed participation agreement.
The clinical outcomes assessment will include all patients enrolled in Group PT that meet inclusion criteria (clinical diagnosis of knee OA).
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kelli Dominick Allen, PhD | Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC | Principal Investigator |
| Courtney H Van Houtven, PhD | Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC | Principal Investigator |
| Susan N. Hastings, MD MHSc | Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC | Durham | North Carolina | 27705-3875 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41037266 | Derived | Allen KD, Webb S, Coffman CJ, Anderson L, Cummin G, Drake C, Tucker M, Webster A, Sperber N, Zullig LL, Hughes JM, Ballengee LA, Abbate LM, Hoenig H, Fullenkamp N, Van Houtven CH, Hastings SN. Implementation of Group Physical Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Oct 1;8(10):e2535038. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.35038. | |
| 37828564 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Durham VA Optimizing Function and Independence QUERI | View source |
Not provided
A de-identified, anonymized dataset will be available upon request. Prior to distribution, a local privacy officer and study statistician will certify that the dataset contains no protected health information (PHI). Data will be provided to requestor in electronic format.
Sufficient data and descriptors will be made available to duplicate statistical analysis and confirm conclusions in publication.
No data or statistical code that could lead to re-identification of individuals will be released.
Data will be stored & maintained in an approved, secured location as described in the VA Research Data Inventory Form.
The study statistician will create de-identified, publication-specific datasets that includes all variables presented in the study publication.
Data will only be released per appropriate authorizations or agreements. Written agreements will specify that recipients are prohibited from taking steps to re-identify any individual whose data are included in the dataset.
Not provided
Available upon request
Data will only be released per appropriate authorizations or agreements. Written agreements will specify that recipients are prohibited from taking steps to re- identify any individual whose data are included in the dataset.
Not provided
Not provided
VA facilities (medical centers, community based outpatient clinics, and smaller clinics) were enrolled in three successive cohorts from June 2021 to February 2023.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Foundational REP | Foundational REP uses the Replicating Effective Program implementation strategy and includes 5 elements that were developed and tested in our prior Function QUERI work: Stakeholder engagement; Toolkit; SharePoint access for clinical program training materials; Data dashboard to assist sites with tracking their own data; and Diffusion Networks to promote peer-to-peer sharing and implementation support. Implementation Strategy: Foundational REP: The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for Group PT sites that have not met implementation adoption benchmarks, specifically Foundational REP vs. Enhanced REP (EnREP). The investigators propose that low intensity implementation support that promotes adapting Group PT for context and provides tools for ongoing evaluation (defined as foundational REP), will be sufficient for some but not all sites to successfully implement group PT as a clinical service. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 13, 2024 |
Not provided
Parallel cluster-randomized trial (parallel-CRT): used in pragmatic evaluations of health program or policy interventions, where half the clusters (in this case, VA medical centers) are randomly assigned to two interventions: Foundational REP (active comparator) vs. Enhanced REP (experimental)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Implementation Strategy: Enhanced REP (enREP) | Other | The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for sites that have not met implementation adoption benchmarks, specifically Foundational REP vs. EnREP. The investigators posit that monitoring sites' progress and adding, for sites with low adoption, higher intensity strategies (defined as EnREP) that directly influence teams' capacity and skills to effectively self-organize and problem-solve will lead to higher implementation adoption, penetration, fidelity, and value. |
|
| 7-12 months |
| Derived |
| Webb S, Drake C, Coffman CJ, Sullivan C, Sperber N, Tucker M, Zullig LL, Hughes JM, Kaufman BG, Pura JA, Anderson L, Hastings SN, Van Houtven CH, Abbate LM, Hoenig H, Ballengee LA, Wang V, Allen KD. Group physical therapy for knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation trial. Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Oct 12;4(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00502-7. |
| 36029028 | Derived | Hughes JM, Zullig LL, Choate AL, Decosimo KP, Wang V, Van Houtven CH, Allen KD, Nicole Hastings S. Intensification of Implementation Strategies: Developing a Model of Foundational and Enhanced Implementation Approaches to Support National Adoption and Scale-up. Gerontologist. 2023 Mar 21;63(3):604-613. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac130. |
| FG001 | Enhanced REP | EnREP begins with the same activities as foundational REP. Sites that do not meet EBP-specific a priori benchmarks reflecting adoption within 6 months will continue with foundational REP and will receive higher intensity support for a period of 6 months (enREP). Additionally, sites randomized to enREP that met adoption benchmarks but did do not meet the sustainment benchmark at 9 months, will also receive intensified implementation support for the remainder of the study period (3 months). The higher intensity support will include one-on-one calls approximately every 3 to 4 weeks between site implementation teams and a trained practice facilitator (from Function QUERI team). The facilitator will coach individual sites using techniques, processes, and activities to help teams make decisions and identify and solve problems. Facilitators' actions will depend on each site's needs and clinical context. Implementation Strategy: Enhanced REP (enREP): The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for sites that have not met implementation adoption benchmarks, specifically Foundational REP vs. EnREP. The investigators posit that monitoring sites' progress and adding higher intensity strategies, for sites not meeting program benchmarks (defined as EnREP), which directly influence teams' capacity and skills to effectively self-organize and problem-solve, will lead to higher implementation adoption, penetration, fidelity, and value. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Data were collected at the site level. The unit of analysis for this study is VA facilities.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Foundational REP | Foundational REP uses the Replicating Effective Program implementation strategy and includes 5 elements that were developed and tested in our prior Function QUERI work: Stakeholder engagement; Toolkit; SharePoint access for clinical program training materials; Data dashboard to assist sites with tracking their own data; and Diffusion Networks to promote peer-to-peer sharing and implementation support. Implementation Strategy: Foundational REP: The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for group PT sites that have not met implementation adoption benchmarks, specifically Foundational REP vs. Enhanced REP. The investigators propose that low intensity implementation support that promotes adapting Group PT for context and provides tools for ongoing evaluation (defined as foundational REP), will be sufficient for some but not all sites to successfully implement group PT as a clinical service. |
| BG001 | Enhanced REP | EnREP begins with the same activities as foundational REP. Sites that do not meet EBP-specific a priori benchmarks reflecting adoption within 6 months will continue with foundational REP and will receive higher intensity support for a period of 6 months (enREP). Additionally, sites randomized to enREP that met adoption benchmarks but did do not meet the sustainment benchmark, will also receive intensified implementation support for the remainder of the study period (3 months). The higher intensity support will include one-on-one calls approximately every 3 to 4 weeks between site implementation teams and a trained practice facilitator (from Function QUERI team). The facilitator will coach individual sites using techniques, processes, and activities to help teams make decisions and identify and solve problems. Facilitators' actions will depend on each site's needs and clinical context. Implementation Strategy: Enhanced REP (enREP): The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for sites that have not met implementation adoption benchmarks, specifically Foundational REP vs. EnREP. The investigators posit that monitoring sites' progress and adding, for sites with low adoption, higher intensity strategies (defined as EnREP) that directly influence teams' capacity and skills to effectively self-organize and problem-solve will lead to higher implementation adoption, penetration, fidelity, and value. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| VA Facilities |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Count of Units | VA Facilities | VA Facilities |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Data was collected at the site level and these characteristics were not relevant and not collected. | Count of Units | VA Facilities | VA Facilities |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Units | VA Facilities | VA Facilities |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Based on geographic census region. | Count of Units | VA Facilities | VA Facilities |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Facility Complexity | Defined using a VA facility-level measure that reflects the complexity of services offered. There are five classifications: 1a (most complex), 1b, 1c, 2, or 3 (least complex). | Count of Units | VA Facilities | VA Facilities |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Implementation Experience | Count of Units | VA Facilities | VA Facilities |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Rurality | Determined using the VA Office of Rural Health (ORH) rurality calculator, which uses the closest facility or county/zip code to determine percent of rural Veterans served. We dichotomized rurality as high (≥50%) and low (<50%). | Count of Units | VA Facilities | VA Facilities |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Penetration | Penetration is defined as the average number of patients enrolling in the group physical therapy (PT) program on a monthly basis (defined as completing at least one class). | Data were collected at the site level. The unit of analysis for this study is VA facilities. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | patients per month | 7-12 months | VA Facilities | VA Facilities |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Fidelity | Fidelity will be the average number of group PT sessions attended by patients who enroll in the program. | Data were collected at the site level. The unit of analysis for this study is VA facilities. Fidelity was only relevant to patients that attended Group PT sessions; therefore, calculations only included sites that held a Group PT class (Foundational sites = 7, Enhanced sites = 9) and capped class attendance at 6 classes maximum (although sites could allow patients to attend more than 6 classes). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Classes per patient | 7-12 months | VA Facilities | VA Facilities |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Adoption | Adoption will be defined as: 1) Delivery of Group PT as a clinical service (delivery of at least 1 Group PT class) by the VA Medical Center, and 2) Enrollment of at least 5 patients. | Data were collected at the site level. The unit of analysis for this study is VA facilities. Program adoption is a binary outcome defined as delivery of Group PT as a clinical service (delivery of at least 1 Group PT class) by the VA Medical Center, and enrollment of at least 5 patients. | Posted | Number | Number of VA facilities that adopted | 7-12 months | VA Facilities | VA Facilities |
|
Analysis was at the site level and there were no possible adverse events.
All cause mortality and/or serious adverse or other (Not Including Serious) adverse events were not collected on Veterans, caregivers, or providers.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Foundational REP | Foundational REP uses the Replicating Effective Program implementation strategy and includes 5 elements that were developed and tested in our prior Function QUERI work: Stakeholder engagement; Toolkit; SharePoint access for clinical program training materials; Data dashboard to assist sites with tracking their own data; and Diffusion Networks to promote peer-to-peer sharing and implementation support. Implementation Strategy: Foundational REP: The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for group PT sites that have not met implementation adoption benchmarks, specifically Foundational REP vs. Enhanced REP. The investigators propose that low intensity implementation support that promotes adapting Group PT for context and provides tools for ongoing evaluation (defined as foundational REP), will be sufficient for some but not all sites to successfully implement group PT as a clinical service. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG001 | Enhanced REP | EnREP begins with the same activities as foundational REP. Sites that do not meet EBP-specific a priori benchmarks reflecting adoption within 6 months will continue with foundational REP and will receive higher intensity support for a period of 6 months (enREP). Additionally, sites randomized to enREP that met adoption benchmarks but did do not meet the sustainment benchmark, will also receive intensified implementation support for the remainder of the study period (3 months). The higher intensity support will include one-on-one calls approximately every 3 to 4 weeks between site implementation teams and a trained practice facilitator (from Function QUERI team). The facilitator will coach individual sites using techniques, processes, and activities to help teams make decisions and identify and solve problems. Facilitators' actions will depend on each site's needs and clinical context. Implementation Strategy: Enhanced REP (enREP): The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for sites that have not met implementation adoption benchmarks, specifically Foundational REP vs. EnREP. The investigators posit that monitoring sites' progress and adding, for sites with low adoption, higher intensity strategies (defined as EnREP) that directly influence teams' capacity and skills to effectively self-organize and problem-solve will lead to higher implementation adoption, penetration, fidelity, and value. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Kelli Allen | Durham VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) | 919-286-0411 | 177090 | Kelli.Allen@va.gov |
| Jan 14, 2025 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| VA Facilities |
|
|
| VA Facilities |
|
|
| VA Facilities |
|
|
| VA Facilities |
|
|
| VA Facilities |
|
|
| VA Facilities |
|
|
| Enhanced REP |
EnREP begins with the same activities as foundational REP. Sites that do not meet EBP-specific a priori benchmarks reflecting adoption within 6 months will continue with foundational REP and will receive higher intensity support for a period of 6 months (enREP). Additionally, sites randomized to enREP that met adoption benchmarks but did do not meet the sustainment benchmark, will also receive intensified implementation support for the remainder of the study period (3 months). The higher intensity support will include one-on-one calls approximately every 3 to 4 weeks between site implementation teams and a trained practice facilitator (from Function QUERI team). The facilitator will coach individual sites using techniques, processes, and activities to help teams make decisions and identify and solve problems. Facilitators' actions will depend on each site's needs and clinical context. Implementation Strategy: Enhanced REP (enREP): The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for sites that have not met implementation adoption benchmarks, specifically Foundational REP vs. EnREP. The investigators posit that monitoring sites' progress and adding, for sites with low adoption, higher intensity strategies (defined as EnREP) that directly influence teams' capacity and skills to effectively self-organize and problem-solve will lead to higher implementation adoption, penetration, fidelity, and value. |
|
|
|
EnREP begins with the same activities as foundational REP. Sites that do not meet EBP-specific a priori benchmarks reflecting adoption within 6 months will continue with foundational REP and will receive higher intensity support for a period of 6 months (enREP). Additionally, sites randomized to enREP that met adoption benchmarks but did do not meet the sustainment benchmark, will also receive intensified implementation support for the remainder of the study period (3 months). The higher intensity support will include one-on-one calls approximately every 3 to 4 weeks between site implementation teams and a trained practice facilitator (from Function QUERI team). The facilitator will coach individual sites using techniques, processes, and activities to help teams make decisions and identify and solve problems. Facilitators' actions will depend on each site's needs and clinical context. Implementation Strategy: Enhanced REP (enREP): The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for sites that have not met implementation adoption benchmarks, specifically Foundational REP vs. EnREP. The investigators posit that monitoring sites' progress and adding, for sites with low adoption, higher intensity strategies (defined as EnREP) that directly influence teams' capacity and skills to effectively self-organize and problem-solve will lead to higher implementation adoption, penetration, fidelity, and value. |
|
|